Saudi Energy Companies in 2025: Billion-Dollar Profits Defy Market Volatility

Saudi and foreign investors stand in front of the logo of the giant Saudi oil company Aramco during the 10th Global Competitiveness Forum (AFP)
Saudi and foreign investors stand in front of the logo of the giant Saudi oil company Aramco during the 10th Global Competitiveness Forum (AFP)
TT

Saudi Energy Companies in 2025: Billion-Dollar Profits Defy Market Volatility

Saudi and foreign investors stand in front of the logo of the giant Saudi oil company Aramco during the 10th Global Competitiveness Forum (AFP)
Saudi and foreign investors stand in front of the logo of the giant Saudi oil company Aramco during the 10th Global Competitiveness Forum (AFP)

In 2025, the Saudi energy sector demonstrated a superior ability to fortify its financial gains and navigate global market fluctuations, achieving a net profit exceeding $92.5 billion (347.2 billion riyals). Despite pressures imposed by the global supply-and-demand equation and supply chain disruptions, the financial results of listed companies revealed a strategic shift in performance. Price momentum for oil was no longer the sole driver; instead, operational efficiency and smart hedging emerged as safety valves that ensured the continuity of massive cash flows, with revenues exceeding $430 billion.

While profits recorded a relative decline of approximately 11.5 percent compared to the exceptional year of 2024, when they reached $104.62 billion (392.58 billion riyals), the results showed a positive variance for logistics and drilling companies such as "Bahri" and "ADES." This indicates a new phase of operational maturity and diversification of income sources within the region's most vital sector.

This decline in sector profits is attributed to the falling earnings of "Saudi Aramco," the heaviest weight in the Saudi market index. Other sector companies were also affected by multiple challenges, including declining revenues, lower sales, and reduced dividend distributions from investment portfolios.

Variance in Company Profits

Financial results for energy sector companies showed a variance in performance: profits rose for two companies, declined for one, and another narrowed its losses. Additionally, one company continued its losses, while another shifted to a loss after recording profits during 2024.

In detail, "Saudi Aramco" achieved the highest profit margin among sector companies, reaching $92.75 billion (348.04 billion riyals) during 2025, despite a decline of 11.64 percent compared to the previous year. The company attributed this decline to lower revenues and sales-related income, though this was partially offset by a decrease in operating costs and lower income taxes and Zakat. "Bahri" ranked second with profits of $647.58 million (2.43 billion riyals) during 2025, a growth of 0.12 percent compared to the previous year's profits of $578.29 million (2.17 billion riyals). The company attributed its profit growth to higher total quarters for the oil transport sector and improved operational performance and global freight rates.

"ADES" came in third with profits reaching $218.13 million (818.5 million riyals), achieving a growth of 2 percent compared to the previous year. The company stated that the rise in net profit reflected an increase in depreciation and interest expenses relative to revenues, in addition to gains recorded in the third quarter under "profits from equity instruments at fair value through profit or loss," the impact of which was largely dissipated by costs related to an acquisition deal.

A man passes by the Saudi Stock Exchange logo (Reuters)

Sector Revenues

At the revenue level for sector companies during 2025, there was a decline of approximately 4.74 percent, recording revenues of about $430.12 billion (1.61 trillion riyals) compared to $450.4 billion (1.69 trillion riyals) in 2024, a decrease of $21.44 billion (80.45 billion riyals).

Commenting on these results, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Humaid Al-Khaldi, financial market analyst and member of the Saudi Economic Association, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the energy sector is strategic and vital to the Saudi economy, and these results reflect the continued high profitability of sector companies despite the relative decline. He described this decline as "natural" following the exceptional levels of 2024, reflecting the moderation of oil prices compared to the previous year, alongside the OPEC+ alliance's commitment to production cut policies to support balance.

He noted the decline in revenues resulted from lower prices and volumes despite remaining at strong levels, as well as rising operational and investment costs for some companies, particularly in expansion and renewable energy projects. Conversely, companies like "Bahri" and "ADES Holding" showed positive performance supported by growth in demand for maritime transport and drilling services, reflecting a diversification of profitability sources within the sector.

Al-Khaldi expected the sector to remain stable in the near term with a slight inclination toward growth, supported by several factors including continued global oil supply management to support prices within a balanced range, and Aramco’s expansion into gas, clean energy, and petrochemicals, reducing reliance solely on crude oil. He also noted the improved performance of service companies (drilling and transport) with the increase in regional projects.

Over the medium to long term, he expected the future of sector companies to carry a strategic shift toward focusing on diversifying energy sources through hydrogen and renewables, enhancing operational efficiency, and reducing costs. He highlighted that companies would benefit from Saudi Vision 2030 in supporting investments and infrastructure, noting that the sector remains strong and profitable, and the current decline is a healthy correction after a historical peak, while the trend toward diversification and sustainability will be the primary driver for growth in the coming years.

Operational Factors

For his part, Mohammed Hamdi Omar, CEO of "G-World," told Asharq Al-Awsat that the economic reading of these figures indicates the Saudi energy sector has not lost its strength but has entered a more complex phase than merely achieving high profits.

He added: "We are facing a sector that is still achieving massive profitability levels exceeding 347 billion riyals, but the more important picture is that growth is no longer based on price momentum alone; it has become more sensitive to operational factors, global demand, refining margins, and the variance in performance of companies within the sector."

He explained that the reasons for the decline in sector profits "stem from the exceptional weight of 'Aramco' within the sector; it is not just a company within the sector, but the main driver of the entire financial picture, and any decline in its revenues or profits is automatically reflected in the overall index. Furthermore, the sector did not move as a single bloc; some companies benefited from improved activity or the strength of their business models, such as 'Bahri' and 'ADES,' while others faced clear operational or market pressures. This reflects that the challenge is no longer just in the sector as a whole, but in the quality of positioning within it."

Omar noted that the "decline in total sector revenues indicates that the global energy market has entered a more volatile phase, where high prices alone are no longer sufficient to ensure a balanced improvement in results. Today, operational management, the ability to hedge, diversification of income sources, and supply chain efficiency have become factors no less important than the price itself. Therefore, those who read these results as merely an annual decline in profits are oversimplifying the picture; more accurately, it is an expression of the sector's transition from a phase of easy rents to a phase of more complex operational competition."

Regarding the future financial results of energy companies, he indicated that the sector "will remain a fundamental pillar of the Saudi economy and financial market, but the difference in the coming phase will be between companies that have the ability to adapt to global volatility and those that remain captive to the price cycle. In other words, the future belongs not just to those with scale, but to those with flexibility, financial discipline, and the ability to turn volatility into opportunity."

He viewed the outlook for the coming period as "positive" at the sector level, "but more precise at the company level, as gains will not be distributed equally, but will instead gravitate toward the most efficient, integrated companies that are best able to manage risks in a global environment that remains turbulent."



Is the $1.8 Trillion Private Credit Market Headed for a ‘Credit Winter’?

Raindrops hang on a sign for Wall Street outside the New York Stock Exchange in Manhattan in New York City, New York, US, October 26, 2020. (Reuters)
Raindrops hang on a sign for Wall Street outside the New York Stock Exchange in Manhattan in New York City, New York, US, October 26, 2020. (Reuters)
TT

Is the $1.8 Trillion Private Credit Market Headed for a ‘Credit Winter’?

Raindrops hang on a sign for Wall Street outside the New York Stock Exchange in Manhattan in New York City, New York, US, October 26, 2020. (Reuters)
Raindrops hang on a sign for Wall Street outside the New York Stock Exchange in Manhattan in New York City, New York, US, October 26, 2020. (Reuters)

Could private credit become the next global financial crisis? The question is gaining urgency across financial and regulatory circles after years of explosive growth in lending outside the traditional banking system created a market worth more than $1.8 trillion, much of it operating beyond close regulatory scrutiny.

The concerns sharpened after JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon warned that losses in the sector could exceed expectations once the credit cycle turns, citing deteriorating lending standards and rising leverage.

Regulators are beginning to respond. The Financial Stability Board, which includes G20 central bank governors and finance ministers, has urged national regulators to tighten oversight of private credit markets. At the same time, the European Central Bank identified private credit as one of the leading threats to financial stability alongside elevated asset valuations.

In its Financial Stability Review released in late May, the ECB highlighted two major vulnerabilities within the sector. The first was what it described as a “snowball effect,” with some funds struggling to liquidate assets while facing rising redemption requests from investors, increasing the risk of distressed sales.

The second was the rise of “double leverage,” as private credit funds increasingly borrow from traditional banks to finance their own lending activity, creating deeper links between banks and nonbank lenders.

Mohammed Farraj, senior executive for asset management at Arbah Capital, explained that the sector’s rapid expansion was rooted in structural shifts that followed the 2008 global financial crisis. As banks pulled back from lending to small and medium-sized companies under stricter Basel III capital and liquidity regulation, private credit funds moved in to fill the financing gap.

Jamie Dimon, Chairman and Chief Executive officer (CEO) of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) speaks to the Economic Club of New York in Manhattan in New York City, US, April 23, 2024. (Reuters)

“Their flexibility and ability to move quickly outside conventional banking restrictions allowed them to capture significant market share,” Farraj told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Private credit refers to direct lending to companies through nonbank financial institutions without using banks or public debt markets. Unlike traditional banks, which rely on short-term deposits and operate under strict liquidity requirements, private credit funds are financed by long-term institutional capital from pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds.

The sector encompasses a wide range of financing tools, including direct lending, mezzanine financing, distressed debt investing, startup financing, and asset-backed lending tied to real estate, equipment, or intellectual property.

Years of ultra-low interest rates after 2008 accelerated institutional demand for private credit as investors searched for higher yields. More recently, higher global interest rates have made the sector even more attractive because many private credit loans carry floating rates that rise automatically with central bank tightening.

Farraj argued that the current environment offers annual returns ranging from 10 percent to 15 percent, well above those available in traditional fixed-income markets.

The company logo and trading information for BlackRock is displayed on a screen on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, US, March 30, 2017. (Reuters)

However, he cautioned that higher borrowing costs are also placing growing pressure on heavily indebted companies, increasing the risk of defaults, particularly among businesses with fragile balance sheets.

Transparency remains one of the sector’s biggest weaknesses. Private credit assets are not priced daily in public markets but are instead valued periodically using internal models, potentially delaying the recognition of losses and creating a misleading impression of stability.

Concerns intensified earlier this year after a BlackRock private credit fund cut its net asset value by nearly 19 percent because of deteriorating technology-sector loans, prompting closer scrutiny from US regulators.

Despite mounting concerns, Farraj maintained that private credit differs fundamentally from the 2008 mortgage crisis because losses are concentrated among sophisticated institutional investors rather than bank depositors.

Still, he warned that hidden systemic risks could emerge through the growing ties between banks and private credit funds.

He expected the sector to surpass $3 trillion in the coming years, driven by institutional demand and the expanding use of artificial intelligence in credit analysis and risk assessment.


Saudi Healthcare Firms Post $305 Million in Q1 Profit

Members of a family gather to visit a patient at a Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib hospital in Saudi Arabia (website) 
Members of a family gather to visit a patient at a Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib hospital in Saudi Arabia (website) 
TT

Saudi Healthcare Firms Post $305 Million in Q1 Profit

Members of a family gather to visit a patient at a Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib hospital in Saudi Arabia (website) 
Members of a family gather to visit a patient at a Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib hospital in Saudi Arabia (website) 

Saudi Arabia’s listed healthcare companies reported combined net profits of SAR1.148 billion ($305.9 million) in the first quarter of 2026, as aggressive expansion plans and higher financing costs pressured earnings despite strong demand for medical services.

The Kingdom’s 13 publicly traded healthcare firms saw profits decline 38.3 percent from SAR1.862 billion ($496.2 million) a year earlier, according to financial disclosures on the Saudi Exchange (Tadawul). Analysts described the drop as a temporary correction tied to capital expenditures rather than a sign of weakening sector fundamentals.

The sector continued to benefit from rising demand for healthcare services, growing patient volumes, higher hospital occupancy rates, geographic expansion, increased operating capacity, and the steady growth of health insurance coverage. Government-backed digital transformation and healthcare reforms under Saudi Vision 2030 also continued to support the industry.

The listed firms include Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Mouwasat Medical Services, Dallah Health, Saudi Chemical Company Holding , Ayyan Investment company, Care Medical, Fakeeh Care Group, SMC Healthcare, Al Hammadi Holding, Almoosa Health, Middle East Healthcare Company (Saudi German Health), Scientific and Medical Equipment House, and Canadian Medical Center.

Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Services Group remained the sector’s dominant player, accounting for about 43 percent of total industry profits. The company posted SAR503 million in net income during the quarter, although earnings fell 9.6 percent because of higher fixed costs linked to strategic expansion projects, as well as increased depreciation and financing expenses. Revenue nevertheless rose 8.8 percent to SAR3.44 billion.

Mouwasat Medical Services ranked second, reporting profits of SAR201 million, up 2 percent year-on-year. The company attributed the performance to the resilience of its operating model, lower zakat provisions, and a 9.1 percent increase in revenue to SAR 833.8 million.

Saudi Chemical Holding Company came third, posting net profits of SAR87.2 million, up 5.9 percent from the same period last year. The gains were driven by higher product sales volumes, lower provisions for trade receivables, reduced financing expenses, and profits from the revaluation of derivative instruments used to hedge interest-rate risks.

Financial analyst Nasser Alrashid said the healthcare sector remains among the Saudi market’s most defensive and stable industries, supported by long-term drivers including population growth, expanding health insurance coverage, and Vision 2030 healthcare reforms.

For his part, market analyst Tariq Al Atiq said sector profitability is likely to improve in the second half of 2026 as companies gradually absorb expansion-related costs and new projects reach stronger occupancy levels. He added that privatization, public-private partnerships, and wider adoption of digital technology and artificial intelligence are expected to further support growth.

 

 


Trump Administration Proposes 25% Tariff to Punish Brazil Over Trade Practices

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer speaks with reporters at the White House in Washington, DC, US, April 2, 2026. (Reuters)
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer speaks with reporters at the White House in Washington, DC, US, April 2, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Trump Administration Proposes 25% Tariff to Punish Brazil Over Trade Practices

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer speaks with reporters at the White House in Washington, DC, US, April 2, 2026. (Reuters)
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer speaks with reporters at the White House in Washington, DC, US, April 2, 2026. (Reuters)

The Trump administration has proposed a new punitive tariff of 25% on many imports from Brazil, after deciding its practices were unfair on a range of issues from digital trade to illegal deforestation, top trade official Jamieson Greer said on Monday.

The measures, under the Section 301 trade legislation, cover areas such as electronic payment services, preferential tariffs, intellectual property protection and ethanol market access as well, the Office of the United States Trade Representative said.

It proposed the new duties as it released the results of its unfair trade practices investigation ‌into Brazil that ‌started last year under Section 301 of the Trade Act of ‌1974.

But ⁠it excluded some ⁠items, such as beef, coffee, rare earths, other metals and aircraft parts from the new tariffs.

Brazil's practices in the areas investigated "are unreasonable and burden or restrict US commerce, are thus actionable under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act," the USTR said in a statement.

The tariffs would partially replace a tariff of 50% on many Brazilian goods imposed last year by President Donald Trump, with 40% as a punishment for Brazil's prosecution of its former president, Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro.

However, ⁠the US Supreme Court struck down those duties in February.

In a ‌statement, Greer said he launched the Section 301 investigation ‌to tackle "longstanding and pervasive US concerns with certain of Brazil's trade policies and practices."

Despite recent engagement with ‌Brazilian President Inacio Lula da Silva and his cabinet, Greer said the United States ‌and Brazil "continue to have substantial differences in resolving issues identified in this investigation."

PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED TARIFFS SET FOR JULY 6

The trade agency invited comment on the proposed tariffs through July 1, with a public hearing set for July 6. It faces a July 15 deadline for taking "responsive action" in ‌the Section 301 investigation.

Trump used the same statute to impose sweeping tariffs on Chinese goods during his first term.

The USTR has several ⁠other open Section 301 ⁠investigations that are expected to lead to new duties.

Among these are one covering excess industrial capacity in China and 15 other trading partners, as well as one into enforcement of forced labor bans in 60 countries.

The agency opened a new investigation on Friday into Vietnam's intellectual property practices.

Regarding its Brazil findings, the USTR said the proposed new 25% tariff would not apply to Brazilian imports subject to national security-related tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.

These include 50% duties on steel, aluminum and copper and 25% duties on finished products made from those metals, as well as a 25% duty on motor vehicles and auto parts.

The USTR said products exempted from the proposed 25% tariffs included many fruits and nuts, crude oil and petroleum products, pharmaceutical compounds, organic chemicals and fertilizers.

These are in addition to beef, coffee, rare earths, certain other metals and ores and Brazilian aircraft and aircraft parts.