Rouhani Warns of Undermining Presidential Powers in Iran

Former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is seen at a meeting with Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the members of the Assembly of Experts. (Supreme Leader's website)
Former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is seen at a meeting with Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the members of the Assembly of Experts. (Supreme Leader's website)
TT

Rouhani Warns of Undermining Presidential Powers in Iran

Former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is seen at a meeting with Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the members of the Assembly of Experts. (Supreme Leader's website)
Former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is seen at a meeting with Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the members of the Assembly of Experts. (Supreme Leader's website)

Former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani strongly criticized the Iranian electoral body for disqualifying him from running in the Assembly of Experts elections that were held in March, describing the move as a threat to the country’s political system, particularly the presidency.

Rouhani has repeatedly asked for explanations from the Guardian Council, the body overseeing Iranian elections.

His disqualification was unexpected and came during elections aimed at selecting influential clerics for the Assembly of Experts, who would potentially choose the next Supreme Leader.

Rouhani’s recent political rejection raised eyebrows in political circles, considering his extensive track record.

Having served as President for eight years (2013-2021) and previously holding key positions like Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council for 16 years under reformist leaders, Rouhani seemed like a formidable candidate.

Additionally, his 24-year stint in the Assembly of Experts added weight to his credentials.

On Monday, Rouhani revealed details of a “confidential” letter from Ahmad Jannati, head of the Guardian Council, explaining the reasons for his disqualification.

The Council, a key institution under Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, holds significant sway, with half its members directly chosen by him and the others indirectly selected.

According to a statement on Rouhani’s official website, the Guardian Council responded after he sent four letters asking why he was rejected and three more requesting supporting documents.

Rouhani briefly mentioned the points from the Guardian Council’s letter, indicating he was accused of “disrespecting the judiciary and the Council”, “lacking knowledge and political vision”, “not following the constitution”, “challenging religious beliefs”, and being “untrustworthy”.

However, Rouhani provided a detailed response exceeding 5,000 words, defending himself. He said it “was not just a personal defense, but a defense of the republic and the system,” and that he would not stay silent against this injustice.

He warned that future presidents could lose political freedom if they face similar charges.

Rouhani explained that his criticism of being accused of lacking political vision was due to his government’s openness to the West, particularly regarding the 2015 nuclear deal negotiations.

He said the Guardian Council’s message unfairly judged the deal and Iran’s foreign and regional policies.

He defended the nuclear deal with major powers as a symbol of domestic moderation and constructive global engagement.

He blamed both the parliament and the Guardian Council for blocking his government’s efforts to revive the deal. He urged the Council to read the nuclear deal thoroughly, noting that its implementation involved various government bodies.

Moreover, Rouhani rejected claims that his government had neglected foreign policy, citing improved ties with Russia and China.

He questioned the basis for judging his political vision, emphasizing widespread support among Iranians.

Rouhani’s failed bid for membership in the Assembly of Experts was his latest attempt to maintain influence since leaving office in August 2021.



Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
TT

Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)

Iran on Saturday hinted it would be willing to negotiate on a nuclear agreement with the upcoming administration of US President-elect Donald Trump, but that it has conditions.
Last Thursday, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a “comprehensive” report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.
Ali Larijani, advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said Iran and the US are now in a new position concerning the nuclear file.
In a post on X, he said, “If the current US administration say they are only against Iran’s nuclear weapons, they must accept Iran’s conditions and provide compensation for the damages caused.”

He added, “The US should accept the necessary conditions... so that a new agreement can be reached.”
Larijani stated that Washington withdrew from the JCPOA, thus causing damage to Iran, adding that his country started increasing its production of 60% enriched uranium.
The Iran nuclear accord, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was reached to limit the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
The deal began unraveling in 2018, when Washington, under Trump’s first administration, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and re-imposed a sanction regime of “maximum pressure” on Tehran.
In retaliation, Iran has rapidly ramped up its nuclear activities, including by increasing its stockpiles of enriched uranium to 60% — close to the 90% threshold required to develop a nuclear bomb.
It also began gradually rolling back some of its commitments by increasing its uranium stockpiles and enriching beyond the 3.67% purity -- enough for nuclear power stations -- permitted under the deal.
Since 2021, Tehran has significantly decreased its cooperation with the IAEA by deactivating surveillance devices to monitor the nuclear program and barring UN inspectors.
Most recently, Iran escalated its confrontations with the Agency by announcing it would launch a series of “new and advanced” centrifuges. Its move came in response to a resolution adopted by the United Nations nuclear watchdog that censures Tehran for what the agency called lack of cooperation.
Centrifuges are the machines that enrich uranium transformed into gas by rotating it at very high speed, increasing the proportion of fissile isotope material (U-235).
Shortly after the IAEA passed its resolution last Thursday, Tehran spoke about the “dual role” of IAEA’s chief, Raphael Grossi.
Chairman of the Iranian Parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, Ebrahim Azizi said, “The statements made by Grossi in Tehran do not match his actions in Vienna.”
And contrary to the statements of Azizi, who denied his country’s plans to build nuclear weapons, Tehran did not originally want to freeze its uranium stockpile enriched to 60%
According to the IAEA’s definition, around 42 kg of uranium enriched to 60% is the amount at which creating one atomic weapon is theoretically possible. The 60% purity is just a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
Spokesperson and deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said on Friday that IAEA inspectors were scheduled to come immediately after the meeting of the Board of Governors to evaluate Iran’s capacity, “with those capacities remaining for a month without any interruption in enrichment at 60% purity.”
Iran’s news agency, Tasnim, quoted Kamalvandi as saying that “the pressures resulting from the IAEA resolution are counterproductive, meaning that they increase our ability to enrich.”
He added: “Currently, not only have we not stopped enrichment, but we have orders to increase the speed, and we are gradually working on that."