Iranians Torn Between Harris, Trump

 Iranian women pass in front of an anti-US mural on a street in Tehran, Iran November 6, 2024. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
Iranian women pass in front of an anti-US mural on a street in Tehran, Iran November 6, 2024. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
TT

Iranians Torn Between Harris, Trump

 Iranian women pass in front of an anti-US mural on a street in Tehran, Iran November 6, 2024. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters
Iranian women pass in front of an anti-US mural on a street in Tehran, Iran November 6, 2024. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters

As the US election reached its final stages, opinions in Iran varied on Democratic candidate Kamala Harris and her Republican challenger, Donald Trump, as well as the potential new leadership at the White House and its impact on the complicated US-Iran relations.

Trump emerged as the winner on Wednesday.

Ahead of the elections, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said: “We don’t give much importance to the US presidential election or who wins.”

In a lengthy interview with state television, he added: “Discussions about how the election results might affect Iran’s stance on the Gaza conflict or the Palestinian issue won’t change our core positions, although there may be some tactical shifts.”

Tuesday’s newspaper front pages showed caution and anticipation as Americans went to the polls.

Alongside the election coverage, comments from Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian about an economic war dominated headlines, with many newspapers refraining from direct commentary on global events.

Iran’s former ambassador to Germany Ali Majedi said on Monday: “Iran is engaged in an economic war.”

“We want missiles for self-defense, not to attack other countries,” he added.

This came after Majedi signaled that Iran was open to easing its response to Israel if it rethinks its actions and agrees to a ceasefire.

The reformist newspaper Ham Mihan warned that if Harris is elected, the region, including Iran, could face more challenges, especially with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s aggressive policies.

The paper also pointed out that Biden’s administration failed to make significant progress in reaching a deal with Iran, blaming a lack of coordination and political weakness in his party.

The hardline Kayhan newspaper criticized Majedi’s comments about possibly negotiating with Trump, saying he had abandoned the 2015 nuclear deal and imposed tough conditions on negotiations.

In an interview with Shargh, Majedi said that Harris’s approach to the Middle East is more “humanitarian and flexible,” and predicted that a return of Trump could worsen tensions.

He also believed that under Harris, there might be a better chance for nuclear talks, as Biden had tried to revive the deal.

However, Majedi noted that Trump could act independently, unlike Harris, Obama, and Biden, who follow Democratic Party policies. This could mean Trump would take a different, more personal approach in dealing with Iran.



Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
TT

Iran Says Could Abandon Nuclear Weapons But Has Conditions

A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)
A sample of the surveillance cameras that monitor the Iranian nuclear facilities presented at a press conference in Vienna. (Reuters)

Iran on Saturday hinted it would be willing to negotiate on a nuclear agreement with the upcoming administration of US President-elect Donald Trump, but that it has conditions.
Last Thursday, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a “comprehensive” report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.
Ali Larijani, advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said Iran and the US are now in a new position concerning the nuclear file.
In a post on X, he said, “If the current US administration say they are only against Iran’s nuclear weapons, they must accept Iran’s conditions and provide compensation for the damages caused.”

He added, “The US should accept the necessary conditions... so that a new agreement can be reached.”
Larijani stated that Washington withdrew from the JCPOA, thus causing damage to Iran, adding that his country started increasing its production of 60% enriched uranium.
The Iran nuclear accord, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was reached to limit the Iranian nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
The deal began unraveling in 2018, when Washington, under Trump’s first administration, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and re-imposed a sanction regime of “maximum pressure” on Tehran.
In retaliation, Iran has rapidly ramped up its nuclear activities, including by increasing its stockpiles of enriched uranium to 60% — close to the 90% threshold required to develop a nuclear bomb.
It also began gradually rolling back some of its commitments by increasing its uranium stockpiles and enriching beyond the 3.67% purity -- enough for nuclear power stations -- permitted under the deal.
Since 2021, Tehran has significantly decreased its cooperation with the IAEA by deactivating surveillance devices to monitor the nuclear program and barring UN inspectors.
Most recently, Iran escalated its confrontations with the Agency by announcing it would launch a series of “new and advanced” centrifuges. Its move came in response to a resolution adopted by the United Nations nuclear watchdog that censures Tehran for what the agency called lack of cooperation.
Centrifuges are the machines that enrich uranium transformed into gas by rotating it at very high speed, increasing the proportion of fissile isotope material (U-235).
Shortly after the IAEA passed its resolution last Thursday, Tehran spoke about the “dual role” of IAEA’s chief, Raphael Grossi.
Chairman of the Iranian Parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, Ebrahim Azizi said, “The statements made by Grossi in Tehran do not match his actions in Vienna.”
And contrary to the statements of Azizi, who denied his country’s plans to build nuclear weapons, Tehran did not originally want to freeze its uranium stockpile enriched to 60%
According to the IAEA’s definition, around 42 kg of uranium enriched to 60% is the amount at which creating one atomic weapon is theoretically possible. The 60% purity is just a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
Spokesperson and deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said on Friday that IAEA inspectors were scheduled to come immediately after the meeting of the Board of Governors to evaluate Iran’s capacity, “with those capacities remaining for a month without any interruption in enrichment at 60% purity.”
Iran’s news agency, Tasnim, quoted Kamalvandi as saying that “the pressures resulting from the IAEA resolution are counterproductive, meaning that they increase our ability to enrich.”
He added: “Currently, not only have we not stopped enrichment, but we have orders to increase the speed, and we are gradually working on that."