Iran: Behind Trump’s Threat, an Opportunity

An Iranian woman jumps over a flame in celebration of the last week of the Persian year in Tehran (AP)
An Iranian woman jumps over a flame in celebration of the last week of the Persian year in Tehran (AP)
TT
20

Iran: Behind Trump’s Threat, an Opportunity

An Iranian woman jumps over a flame in celebration of the last week of the Persian year in Tehran (AP)
An Iranian woman jumps over a flame in celebration of the last week of the Persian year in Tehran (AP)

- Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi described US President Donald Trump’s message as a “threat that contains an opportunity,” confirming that Tehran is evaluating its response through “appropriate channels” and will respond soon.

In recent days, Washington and Tehran have exchanged indirect messages to gauge the possibility of negotiations. While Trump pursues a policy of “maximum pressure,” Iran refuses to engage in talks under what it calls “threats and intimidation.”

Speaking on Thursday, Araghchi stated that Iran would respond to Trump’s message but is “not in a hurry.” He added: “Since it is Nowruz and Ramadan, we are not rushing to reply, but it won’t take too long. We will respond in the coming days.”

According to the government-affiliated Mehr News Agency, Araghchi noted that Trump’s message contains both “threats and claims of opportunities.” He explained: “We are carefully analyzing every angle and point in Trump’s message, and our response will take into account all aspects of both the threats and the opportunities.”

Araghchi reiterated that Tehran rejects direct negotiations with Washington “under pressure and intensified sanctions,” stating: “Our policy is indirect negotiations as long as the threats continue... We are prepared for war, but we do not welcome it. The coming year will be difficult, significant, and complex.”

Government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani confirmed that Trump’s message to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is “under review” and that a “suitable response” will be given at the appropriate time and in a manner deemed appropriate.

Speaking to the ILNA news agency, Mohajerani added that the government currently has no plans to disclose the contents of Trump’s message.

Last week, Khamenei rejected Trump’s message, calling it a “deception” and arguing that his excessive demands would “tighten the noose of sanctions around Iran and increase pressure on the country.”

Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers during his first presidential term and reimposed sanctions on Iran. Since then, Iran has violated the deal’s limits on its nuclear program, prompting Western powers to accuse Tehran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons by enriching uranium to 60% purity—well beyond what is considered necessary for a civilian nuclear program.

Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes and that it remains committed to its obligations under international law.

On March 21, 2025 (Friday), Iranians will celebrate the arrival of the year 1404 in their calendar, along with nearly 300 million people worldwide, including communities in Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, and Kurdish regions of Iraq and Türkiye.

Trump extended Nowruz greetings to Iranians, expressing his “appreciation for Iran’s rich culture and the outstanding talents of its people in various fields,” according to a message released by the White House on March 19.



The Atlantic Releases the Entire Signal Chat Showing Hegseth’s Detailed Attack Plans against Houthis

US Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) points to text messages by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during an annual worldwide threats assessment hearing at the Longworth House Office Building on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images/AFP)
US Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) points to text messages by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during an annual worldwide threats assessment hearing at the Longworth House Office Building on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images/AFP)
TT
20

The Atlantic Releases the Entire Signal Chat Showing Hegseth’s Detailed Attack Plans against Houthis

US Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) points to text messages by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during an annual worldwide threats assessment hearing at the Longworth House Office Building on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images/AFP)
US Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) points to text messages by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during an annual worldwide threats assessment hearing at the Longworth House Office Building on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images/AFP)

The Atlantic on Wednesday released the entire Signal chat among senior national security officials, showing that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth provided the exact timings of warplane launches and when bombs would drop — before the men and women flying those attacks against Yemen’s Houthis this month on behalf of the United States were airborne.

The disclosure follows two intense days during which leaders of President Donald Trump's intelligence and defense agencies have struggled to explain how details that current and former US officials have said would have been classified wound up on an unclassified Signal chat that included Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg,

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said no classified information was posted to the Signal chat.

Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he and Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the committee’s top Democrat, plan to send a letter to the Trump administration requesting an inspector general investigation into the use of Signal. They want a classified briefing with a top administration official "who can speak to the facts" of the episode.

Top military official was not included in the chat

The chat was also notable for who it excluded: the only military attendee of the principals committee, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Adm. Christopher Grady is currently serving in that position in an acting capacity because Trump fired former chairman Gen. CQ Brown Jr. in February.

National security adviser Mike Waltz was authorized to decide whether to include the Joint Chiefs chairman in the principals committee discussion, "based on the policy relevance of attendees to the issues being considered, the need for secrecy on sensitive matters, staffing needs, and other considerations," the White House said in a Jan. 20 memo.

The Pentagon said it would not comment on the issue, and it was not immediately clear why Grady, currently serving as the president’s top military adviser, would not be included in a discussion on military strikes.

Hegseth has refused to say whether he posted classified information onto Signal. He is traveling in the Indo-Pacific and to date has only scoffed at questions, saying he did not reveal "war plans." Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday that it was up to Hegseth to determine whether the information he was posting was classified or not.

Very specific texts

What was revealed was jaw-dropping in its specificity and includes the type of information that is kept to a very close hold to protect the operational security of a military strike. But Hegseth’s spokesman, Sean Parnell, said in a statement Wednesday that "there were no classified materials or war plans shared. The Secretary was merely updating the group on a plan that was underway."

In the group chat, Hegseth posted multiple details about the impending strike, using military language and laying out when a "strike window" starts, where a "target terrorist" was located, the time elements around the attack and when various weapons and aircraft would be used in the strike. He mentioned that the US was "currently clean" on operational security."

"Godspeed to our Warriors," he wrote.

"1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)"

"1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)"

"1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)"

"1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)"

"1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched."

"MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)"

"We are currently clean on OPSEC" — that is, operational security.

"Godspeed to our Warriors."

Goldberg has said he asked the White House if it opposed publication and that the White House responded that it would prefer he did not publish.

Signal is encrypted but can be vulnerable Signal is a publicly available app that provides encrypted communications, but it can be hacked. It is not approved for carrying classified information.

On March 14, one day before the strikes, the Defense Department cautioned personnel about the vulnerability of Signal, specifically that Russia was attempting to hack the app, according to a US official who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

One known vulnerability is that a malicious actor, with access to a person’s phone, can link his or her device to the user’s Signal and essentially monitor messages remotely in real time.

Leavitt is one of three Trump administration officials who face a lawsuit from The Associated Press on First and Fifth Amendment grounds. The AP says the three are punishing the news agency for editorial decisions they oppose. The White House says the AP is not following an executive order to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.