Trump Awards Boeing Much-Needed Win with F-47 Fighter Jet Contract

 US President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth listen during an event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 21, 2025. Trump announced the award to Boeing of a major contract for the Air Force's high-tech next-generation F-47 fighter plane. (AFP)
US President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth listen during an event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 21, 2025. Trump announced the award to Boeing of a major contract for the Air Force's high-tech next-generation F-47 fighter plane. (AFP)
TT
20

Trump Awards Boeing Much-Needed Win with F-47 Fighter Jet Contract

 US President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth listen during an event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 21, 2025. Trump announced the award to Boeing of a major contract for the Air Force's high-tech next-generation F-47 fighter plane. (AFP)
US President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth listen during an event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 21, 2025. Trump announced the award to Boeing of a major contract for the Air Force's high-tech next-generation F-47 fighter plane. (AFP)

US President Donald Trump awarded Boeing on Friday the contract to build the US Air Force's most sophisticated fighter jet yet, dubbed the F-47, handing the company a much-needed win.

The Next Generation Air Dominance program will replace Lockheed Martin's F-22 Raptor with a crewed aircraft built to enter combat alongside drones.

Trump, the 47th president, announced the new jet's name, the F-47.

"We've given an order for a lot. We can't tell you the price," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

"Our allies are calling constantly," Trump added, saying foreign sales could be an option. "They want to buy them also."

For Boeing, the win marks a reversal of fortune for a company that has struggled on both the commercial and defense sides of its business. It is a major boost for its St. Louis, Missouri, fighter jet production business.

The engineering and manufacturing development contract is worth more than $20 billion. The winner will eventually receive hundreds of billions of dollars in orders over the contract's multi-decade lifetime.

Shares of Boeing rose 4% after the news. The US company beat out Lockheed Martin for the deal. Lockheed's shares fell nearly 7%.

Reuters reported Boeing's victory before the official announcement.

The plane's design remains a closely held secret, but would likely include stealth, advanced sensors, and cutting-edge engines.

"Compared to the F-22, the F-47 will cost less and be more adaptable to future threats - and we will have more of the F-47s in our inventory," said Chief of Staff of the Air Force General David Allvin.

Boeing and Lockheed did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

NGAD was conceived as a "family of systems" centered around a sixth-generation fighter to counter adversaries such as China and Russia.

Allvin added the F-47 will have significantly longer range, more advanced stealth, and will be more sustainable and more easily supported than the F-22.

MAJOR WIN

Boeing's commercial operations have struggled as it attempts to get its best-selling 737 MAX jet production back up to full speed, while its defense operation has been weighed down by underperforming contracts for mid-air refueling tankers, drones and training jets.

"The win is a major boost for the company, which has struggled with cost overruns, schedule delays and execution on other DoD programs," said Roman Schweizer, an analyst at TD Cowen.

Cost overruns at the KC-46 mid-air refueling tanker program have surpassed $7 billion in recent years, while another fixed-price contract to upgrade two Air Force One planes has created a $2-billion loss for the top 5 US defense contractor.

Boeing has faced ongoing scrutiny since a series of crises including a mid-air emergency in January 2024 involving a new Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 missing four key bolts. In January, Boeing reported an $11.8-billion annual loss - its largest since 2020 - due to problems at its major units, along with fallout from a crippling strike that shuttered production of most of its jets.

Boeing has ceded ground to rival Airbus in the delivery race and entered the crosshairs of regulators and customers following a series of missteps. The Federal Aviation Administration in early 2024 imposed a production cap of 38 MAX planes per month.

Lockheed, which was recently eliminated from the competition to build the Navy's next-generation carrier-based stealth fighter, faces an uncertain future in the high-end fighter market after the loss.

Billionaire and presidential adviser Elon Musk has voiced skepticism about the effectiveness of crewed high-end fighters, saying cheaper drones were a better option.

While Lockheed could still protest the award to Boeing, the fact Trump announced the deal in a high-profile Oval Office press conference could reduce the possibility of a public airing of arguments against the agreement from the Bethesda, Maryland-based defense firm.



Are Trump’s Advisors Divided on Iran?

President Donald Trump greets a Marine as he steps off Marine One upon arrival at Morristown Municipal Airport, New Jersey, on Saturday (AFP) 
President Donald Trump greets a Marine as he steps off Marine One upon arrival at Morristown Municipal Airport, New Jersey, on Saturday (AFP) 
TT
20

Are Trump’s Advisors Divided on Iran?

President Donald Trump greets a Marine as he steps off Marine One upon arrival at Morristown Municipal Airport, New Jersey, on Saturday (AFP) 
President Donald Trump greets a Marine as he steps off Marine One upon arrival at Morristown Municipal Airport, New Jersey, on Saturday (AFP) 

In a matter of days, US President Donald Trump has extended a hand to Iran and at the same time, has warned Tehran that it bears responsibility for any attacks by the Houthis in Yemen.

His administration has both demanded that Iran dismantle its nuclear program and offered more flexibility.

Trump has for years dangled force as a means to get his way in negotiations.

But on Iran, some observers see less a strategy than mixed messaging, with a real debate on how the norms-breaking president will handle a US adversary of nearly half a century.

“There is a lot of contradiction within the Trump administration on Iran,” said one Western diplomat, who asked not to be named due to the sensitive nature of the issue. “Sooner or later, it will have to come to a head,” according to AFP.

Trump said on March 7 that he had written a letter to Ali Khamenei offering talks on Iran's contested nuclear program, but also warning of potential military action if he refuses -- a threat also made by Israel.

Trump, who in his first term ripped up a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by predecessor Barack Obama, returned to office saying he would resume his “maximum pressure” policy of sanctions but openly said he was doing so reluctantly out of deference to hawkish advisors.

Steve Witkoff, a friend of Trump who has quickly become his roving global envoy, hinted at compromise with Iran in a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, the conservative pundit and critic of military interventionism who dissuaded Trump from military action against Iran in his first term.

Witkoff said Trump was proposing a “verification program” to show Iran is not pursuing a nuclear weapon -- in line with Obama's deal, which was backed by European allies.

Trump's national security advisor, Mike Waltz, quickly said the goal remained “full dismantlement.”

Iran insists it is not seeking a nuclear bomb, but US intelligence believes it could build one quickly if it decided to do so.

While Trump is the chief decision-maker, he has not shown he is focused on Iran, and Witkoff is spread thin as he also negotiates on Gaza and Ukraine.

On Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, “We have not yet responded to the US letter, and the response to this letter is being prepared and will be submitted soon through the appropriate channels.”

He reiterated that Iran will not have direct talks with the US under maximum pressure in the context of military threats and increased sanctions.

Khamenei already will struggle to accept negotiations with Trump due to his past track record, including ordering the killing of top Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani in 2020.

Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, voiced more optimism about diplomacy. He said Iran could even seek a deal of the sort Trump relishes, such as agreeing to buy US products after years of sanctions.

“If Iran was smart, they would take this opportunity and say, well, here's an American president who really doesn't seem that heavily involved in this issue,” Vatanka said.

“He just wants to be able to say that he got a better deal than Obama did in 2015.”

Trump's outreach comes at a weak point for Iran after Israel decimated its regional allies amid internal discontent over the economy.

Analysts assert that Iran is forced to negotiate with Trump, especially after the “Axis of Resistance” has suffered setbacks such as the collapse of Hamas, the weakening of Hezbollah, and the fall of the Assad regime.

Trump says Iran's military vulnerabilities appeared to have left it in a weakened position, making negotiations more appealing than confrontation.

In recent days, the US President has unleashed major attacks on Yemen's Iranian-linked Houthi insurgents who have been attacking Black Sea shipping in avowed solidarity with the Palestinians.

He warned Iran that if the Houthi attacks continued, there would be severe consequences for Iran.

Hanging over diplomacy is the prospect of military action by Israel, which already struck hard at Iran's air defenses last year.

Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the hawkish Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said that a “credible American and Israeli military threat is instrumental” in dealing with Iran's nuclear program, including in leveraging a strong agreement.

“There is a great amount of cognizance within folks in the administration that Tehran is trying to play the administration to stall for time, and that there needs to be some real benchmarks if diplomacy is going to be an option here,” he said.