Lavrov: ‘Snapback’ Is a Trap Set by Zarif for Iran

In this January 16, 2016 file photo, then-secretary of state John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verified that Iran has met all conditions under the nuclear deal. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP, File) 
In this January 16, 2016 file photo, then-secretary of state John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verified that Iran has met all conditions under the nuclear deal. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP, File) 
TT

Lavrov: ‘Snapback’ Is a Trap Set by Zarif for Iran

In this January 16, 2016 file photo, then-secretary of state John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verified that Iran has met all conditions under the nuclear deal. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP, File) 
In this January 16, 2016 file photo, then-secretary of state John Kerry talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Vienna, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verified that Iran has met all conditions under the nuclear deal. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP, File) 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Wednesday blamed former Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif for the inclusion of the ‘Snapback mechanism’ in the nuclear deal, describing it as a “legal trap” set ahead of the 2015 agreement.

Lavrov’s remarks constitute a direct accusation against Zarif and suggest tension in relations between Moscow and Tehran, observers said.

During an interview with Arab reporters in Moscow, Lavrov was asked to comment on statements attributed to Zarif, in which the former minister criticized Russia for undermining efforts to renew the nuclear deal during President Hassan Rouhani’s term.

“The final decision on JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) was made directly by Zarif and then-US Secretary of State John Kerry. The other participants were essentially observers at that point, watching the US and Iran reach an agreement.”

Lavrov explained that the mechanism was in fact agreed to in the final stage of the negotiations directly between Zarif and Kerry.

“To be honest, we were surprised. But if our Iranian partners accepted this formulation – which, frankly, was a legal “trap” – we had no grounds to object. I can understand why Zarif supported such an unconventional formula,” the Russian FM said.

In an interview on April 2021 with a think tank associated with the Iranian presidency, Zarif described Russia as wanting to stop the nuclear deal, suggesting Moscow wanted to keep Iran at odds with the West. “The Russians didn’t think the JCPOA would reach a result and in the final weeks when they saw the JCPOA was being concluded they started new proposals,” Zarif had said.

Implicit Criticism

Although Lavrov affirmed that Russia worked closely together with Zarif for many years on the JCPOA, his tone carried implicit criticism, as he said, “I can understand why Zarif supported such an unconventional formula: Iran had no intention of violating the JCPOA and was confident that no one would accuse it of doing so.”

Also, Lavrov added, “What happened instead is that Iran did not breach the deal, yet the United States withdrew from it, and the Europeans failed to meet their commitments. After that, they began again demanding new concessions from Iran. Since you mentioned Zarif, this “creation” was largely his.”

Lavrov, who is normally keen to show solidarity with Russia’s allies, chose to criticize Zarif shortly after Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia has played an important role in easing tensions between Iran and Israel.

Meanwhile, Tehran is seeking to strengthen its military cooperation with Moscow, as Western countries reimposed last month the snapback mechanism to reinstate UN sanctions on Iran lifted under a 2015 nuclear deal.

Russia has rejected the UN reimposition of sanctions against Iran. However, Lavrov’s remarks, which suggested that Tehran had supported “the unconventional formula” of the snapback, could weaken Iran's position both at home and abroad, especially as Zarif's critics accuse him of offering concessions during negotiations with the West.

Different Agendas

Tehran hoped Moscow could provide political cover against mounting Western pressure. But Lavrov said Russia and other participants were essentially observers to the talks between Zarif and Kerry at the time of the signing.

Therefore, the Russian FM indirectly signaled that Moscow and Tehran has different agendas, despite sharing military cooperation.

Regarding this cooperation, Lavrov said Russia supplies the equipment that Iran needs. “All of this is carried out strictly within the framework of international law,” he noted.

The Russia minister, however, did not comment when asked if Russia supplied S-400 air defense missile systems to Iran.

Meanwhile, several officials in Tehran fear renewed international isolation, particularly at a time when the government is accused of making strategic concessions.

According to analysts, Lavrov’s statements are a reminder that Moscow does not intend to bear the consequences of its partners' mistakes, and that its support for Tehran is not final.

 

 



UN Rights Chief Wants Next Israeli Govt to 'Change Course Massively'

n Israeli bulldozer demolishes the house of Palestinian prisoner Ibrahim Abdul Karim Daoud at the West Bank village of Beita, 28 October 2026. (EPA)
n Israeli bulldozer demolishes the house of Palestinian prisoner Ibrahim Abdul Karim Daoud at the West Bank village of Beita, 28 October 2026. (EPA)
TT

UN Rights Chief Wants Next Israeli Govt to 'Change Course Massively'

n Israeli bulldozer demolishes the house of Palestinian prisoner Ibrahim Abdul Karim Daoud at the West Bank village of Beita, 28 October 2026. (EPA)
n Israeli bulldozer demolishes the house of Palestinian prisoner Ibrahim Abdul Karim Daoud at the West Bank village of Beita, 28 October 2026. (EPA)

UN rights chief Volker Turk said Wednesday he hopes a new Israeli government will "change course massively" and respect international law, as the country's political future hung in the balance after hard-fought elections.

"The message is: don't continue the current course of warfare where you think you are above international law, because I think that's what we have frankly seen in the current environment," he told reporters in New York.

"Israel has its obligations under international law, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, and they need to respect them, and I hope that the next government will do precisely that and change course massively," the Austrian diplomat added.

Earlier this week, Turk warned that Israel's military occupation in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron, launched after a deadly attack by Palestinian gunmen, raised serious concerns of "ethnic cleansing."

"Collective punishment is a grave violation of international law," he said in a statement Monday.

With more than 85 percent of ballots counted in Israel's election, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing bloc was slightly ahead but still short of a majority, making Israeli Arab parties possible kingmakers.

The Tuesday vote was the first election since the October 7, 2023 attack that led Israel to wage war in Gaza and across the region.


Israel Defense Minister Slams Eisenkot’s Call for Military to Resist PM Pressure

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz attend a graduation ceremony of new Israeli army officers at a base near Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, October 21, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz attend a graduation ceremony of new Israeli army officers at a base near Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, October 21, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Israel Defense Minister Slams Eisenkot’s Call for Military to Resist PM Pressure

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz attend a graduation ceremony of new Israeli army officers at a base near Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, October 21, 2026. (Reuters)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz attend a graduation ceremony of new Israeli army officers at a base near Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, October 21, 2026. (Reuters)

Israel's defense minister on Wednesday denounced opposition candidate Gadi Eisenkot for urging the military to resist post-election pressure from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has threatened new strikes on Iran.

"His call to senior military officials not to obey the directives of the prime minister or me or of other relevant security authorities, on the grounds that 'they have his support', is an anti-democratic statement detached from reality," Israel Katz wrote on X.

Eisenkot, a former military chief, in a speech to supporters after Tuesday's election said that Netanyahu was a caretaker prime minister lacking a mandate and that the military should serve the state rather than the premier.

"Stand firm in the face of any attempt to challenge you. You have my unequivocal backing. Netanyahu, do not dare use Israel's security for your political needs," Eisenkot said.

Netanyahu has repeatedly threatened renewed war on Iran, after bombing campaigns backed by the United States last year and again this year.

Media reports, denied by Netanyahu, said that military chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir pushed back immediately before the election on the prime minister's new plans on Iran.

Katz said that Eisenkot's comments were the latest in "a campaign of lies" about tensions between Netanyahu and the military over Iran.


Caretaker Role Could Limit Netanyahu but Not Rule Out War with Iran

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses his supporters at the election night rally after the first exit polls were announced, in Jerusalem on early October 28, 2026, during Israel's legislative elections. (AFP)
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses his supporters at the election night rally after the first exit polls were announced, in Jerusalem on early October 28, 2026, during Israel's legislative elections. (AFP)
TT

Caretaker Role Could Limit Netanyahu but Not Rule Out War with Iran

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses his supporters at the election night rally after the first exit polls were announced, in Jerusalem on early October 28, 2026, during Israel's legislative elections. (AFP)
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses his supporters at the election night rally after the first exit polls were announced, in Jerusalem on early October 28, 2026, during Israel's legislative elections. (AFP)

Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to face more constraints as Israel's caretaker prime minister after Tuesday's election, but experts say his government could still retain significant powers including when it comes to waging war on Iran.

Neither Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition nor an opposition bloc led by former military chief Gadi Eisenkot is projected by Israeli media ‌to win ‌a majority in the country’s 120-seat legislature. Eisenkot has ‌acknowledged ⁠the prime minister ⁠was still in office as a caretaker but issued a warning that Netanyahu might use security for political ends.

Netanyahu's office has previously rejected accusations he is using the Iran conflict for political gain. His office did not immediately return a request for comment on Wednesday.

“If you look at the letter of the law, a caretaker government has the ⁠same authority, has the same powers as a regular ‌government,” said Guy Lurie, a research ‌fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute, adding however that a caretaker government “has a duty ‌of restraint” and more limited discretion to act in some areas.

A ‌caretaker government faces limitations when it comes to issues such as appointments, but has leeway to act in matters where there is a public interest, analysts say.

“In general, security issues are the clearest exception to this duty of ‌restraint,” said Or Asher, a researcher at the Tel Aviv-based Tachlith Institute, noting that Israel's supreme court has ⁠previously held ⁠that a caretaker government must avoid far-reaching decisions unless they are justified by a pressing necessity.

“The Supreme Court has historically avoided intervening in decisions to go to war, and parliamentary oversight is at its thinnest in the weeks after the new Knesset convenes and before its committees are formed,” Asher said, adding that “a caretaker prime minister can legally take Israel to war, including against Iran”.

After the final tally is in, Israel’s President Isaac Herzog is expected to consult party leaders and then tap the candidate he believes has the best chance of forming a government, with the nominee then getting up to 42 days to establish a government.