Pezeshkian’s Apology to Neighbors Triggers Backlash in Iran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
TT

Pezeshkian’s Apology to Neighbors Triggers Backlash in Iran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a leadership council meeting with judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Ali Reza Arafi last week. (Iranian Presidency)

An apology by Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to neighboring countries for attacks that struck parts of their territories - and his pledge to halt such strikes unless their soil is used to attack Iran - has triggered sharp political debate within Tehran’s ruling establishment.

Lawmakers swiftly condemned the remarks, while military and judicial officials reiterated that US and Israeli interests across the region would remain legitimate targets. The dispute is unfolding at a delicate moment for Iran, following the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Pezeshkian framed the apology as a political signal intended to reassure neighbors and prevent a wider regional confrontation. Critics, however, called it “an unjustified concession in the middle of an open war.”

Military and judicial leaders stressed that any US or Israeli base or interest used against Iran would remain a legitimate target — even if located on the territory of other regional states.

The episode has turned the president’s apology from a diplomatic gesture to contain tensions into the center of an internal power struggle, highlighting divisions within Iran’s leadership over the limits and management of the war.

Following Khamenei’s killing, a temporary leadership council assumed his duties. The body consists of Pezeshkian, judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei and Guardian Council member Alireza Arafi.

In a televised address, Pezeshkian said the council had decided not to target neighboring states or fire missiles at them unless Iran was attacked from their territory.

“I apologize in my name and on behalf of Iran to neighboring countries that Iran attacked,” he said, adding that Tehran does not intend to assault any state.

He said the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps had acted in recent days “based on a field decision” after senior commanders and the supreme leader were killed at the start of the war.

The comments quickly drew pushback. Mohseni-Ejei said evidence gathered by Iran’s armed forces showed that “the geography of some countries in the region has openly or secretly been placed in the service of the enemy,” allowing their territory to be used for attacks against Iran.

“Severe attacks on these targets will continue,” he said, adding that the strategy was already under way and backed by the government and other pillars of the system.

Iran’s military signaled little appetite for de-escalation. The command of Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, the joint operations center under the armed forces’ general staff, said that although it had “not carried out any aggression” against neighboring states so far, all US and Israeli bases and interests across land, sea and air in the region remained primary targets.

In a statement, the command said the armed forces “respect the interests and sovereignty of neighboring countries and have not carried out any aggression against them so far.” But it warned that if hostile actions continued, all military bases and interests belonging to the United States and the “Zionist entity” would face powerful strikes from Iranian armed forces.

A spokesman for the headquarters said any location from which attacks against Iran are launched would be considered a legitimate target, warning that any attempt to enter the region “will end at the bottom of the Gulf” and that Tehran “will not retreat” in confronting the United States and Israel.

In parliament, Mohammad Manan Raisi, a lawmaker representing Qom, said the president’s “strange apology to neighboring countries is regrettable.”

Addressing Pezeshkian, he wrote: “When will it be time for you to apologize to the Iranian people for these humiliating positions?”

Raisi added that the Assembly of Experts must urgently announce a new supreme leader, saying the president’s “humiliating statements” showed the need to select one as soon as possible.

“Is it not true that neighboring countries placed their land, property and hotels at the service of our enemies?” he said. “Should our military not have attacked these bases and enemy properties that you now apologize for striking in such a humiliating manner?”

Conservative lawmaker Jalal Rashidi Kouchi wrote on X: “With all due respect, Mr. President, an apology is offered when a mistake has been made... but we made no mistake.”

He said the president’s message lacked firmness, appearing weak in wording, delivery and even body language.

Iran’s foreign ministry also warned regional states against allowing their territory or resources to be used for attacks on Iran.

In a statement, it said international law prohibits using a country’s territory, directly or indirectly, to harm another state, citing UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 defining aggression.

Countries whose territory is used to launch military attacks against a third state bear international legal responsibility, including compensation for direct and indirect damages, the ministry said.

It added that Iran had been compelled, under its “inherent and natural right” of self-defense, to carry out necessary and proportionate defensive operations against the bases and facilities of aggressors in the region.

Those operations target facilities and capabilities that serve as sources or launch points for hostile acts against the Iranian people, the ministry said, adding that US bases in the region had not strengthened security but had instead supported “American aggressors and the Zionist entity.”

The ministry stressed that Iran seeks to maintain and develop friendly relations with regional states based on mutual respect, good neighborliness and respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. Iranian defensive operations against US bases in the region, it added, should not be interpreted as hostility toward neighboring countries.

Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf also weighed in, writing on X that the Islamic Republic’s defense policies are “constant” and rooted in “principles.”

“As long as there are US bases in the region, its countries will not see stability,” he wrote, adding that “all officials and the people are united around this principle.”

The presidency later sought to clarify the president’s remarks. Mehdi Tabatabaei, head of public relations at the presidential office, said the message was straightforward: if regional states do not cooperate with US attacks on Iran, Tehran will not target them.

“The Islamic Republic will not bow to pressure,” he wrote on X. “Our armed forces will respond firmly, according to rules of engagement, to any attack launched from US bases.”



Two Foreigners Arrested in Iran for Importing Starlink Technology

People walk through the Valiasr Square in Tehran on April 19, 2026. (AFP)
People walk through the Valiasr Square in Tehran on April 19, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Two Foreigners Arrested in Iran for Importing Starlink Technology

People walk through the Valiasr Square in Tehran on April 19, 2026. (AFP)
People walk through the Valiasr Square in Tehran on April 19, 2026. (AFP)

Four individuals, including two foreign nationals, were arrested in Iran's northwest, semi-official Tasnim news agency reported on ‌Sunday, ‌for being part ‌of ⁠a "US-Israel-linked espionage network."

The ⁠foreigners, whose nationality was not disclosed, are accused of importing ⁠satellite internet ‌equipment such ‌as Starlink, which ‌is a ‌criminal offence in the country, which has faced ‌seven weeks of an internet blackout.

Hundreds ⁠of ⁠Iranians have been arrested for "cooperating with enemy states" since the start of the US-Israeli war with Iran.


Türkiye ‘Optimistic’ Middle East Ceasefire Will Be Extended, Says FM

 Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan speaks during the opening ceremony of Antalya Diplomacy Forum in Antalya, Türkiye, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan speaks during the opening ceremony of Antalya Diplomacy Forum in Antalya, Türkiye, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Türkiye ‘Optimistic’ Middle East Ceasefire Will Be Extended, Says FM

 Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan speaks during the opening ceremony of Antalya Diplomacy Forum in Antalya, Türkiye, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan speaks during the opening ceremony of Antalya Diplomacy Forum in Antalya, Türkiye, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)

Türkiye said it remained "optimistic" that a two-week ceasefire between Iran and the United States set to expire on Wednesday would be extended.

"No one wants to see a new war break out when the ceasefire expires next week. We hope ... the parties will extend the ceasefire," Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said on Sunday at the Antalya Diplomacy Forum.

"I hope there'll be an extension. I am optimistic," he said.


UK Ministers Back Starmer Amid Fresh Calls to Quit

 British Prime Minister Keir Starmer co-hosts a multinational virtual summit at the Elysee Presidential Palace, in Paris, France, on April 17, 2026. (Tom Nicholson/Pool via Reuters)
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer co-hosts a multinational virtual summit at the Elysee Presidential Palace, in Paris, France, on April 17, 2026. (Tom Nicholson/Pool via Reuters)
TT

UK Ministers Back Starmer Amid Fresh Calls to Quit

 British Prime Minister Keir Starmer co-hosts a multinational virtual summit at the Elysee Presidential Palace, in Paris, France, on April 17, 2026. (Tom Nicholson/Pool via Reuters)
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer co-hosts a multinational virtual summit at the Elysee Presidential Palace, in Paris, France, on April 17, 2026. (Tom Nicholson/Pool via Reuters)

British government ministers on Sunday backed embattled premier Keir Starmer as he struggles to shake off a scandal over long-time Jeffrey Epstein associate Peter Mandelson.

Starmer is due to face lawmakers in parliament on Monday to explain how Mandelson was appointed Britain's ambassador to the United States in late 2024 despite failing to pass security checks.

The beleaguered prime minister, who has been dogged by the controversy for months, said Friday that he and other ministers were not told Mandelson had failed the vetting process, calling that "unforgivable".

He has blamed foreign office mandarins for allowing Mandelson's appointment against the advice of security officials, and sacked the department's top civil servant Olly Robins on Thursday.

But ex-civil servants have accused Dowing Street of scapegoating Robbins while opposition leaders have called for Starmer to quit, with accusations ranging from incompetence to willful misleading of the public.

Technology minister Liz Kendall told the BBC on Sunday that Starmer would not have appointed Mandelson had he known that he had not received the appropriate security clearance.

Deputy prime minister David Lammy, who was foreign secretary when Mandelson was appointed to Washington, said the same in an interview with the Guardian published late Saturday.

Kendall said Starmer should remain in his job because he had "made the right call" on big issues, such as building closer relations with the European Union and limiting Britain's involvement in the Iran war.

"I think he is an honest man and a man of integrity who says it was a mistake to appoint him," she told Sky News.

Lammy said it was "inexplicable" that the foreign office had kept Downing Street in the dark, telling the Guardian he had been "shocked and surprised" when he learned what happened.

Starmer, already widely unpopular with the British public due to several policy mis-steps, has faced repeated questions about his judgement for selecting Mandelson whose friendship with Epstein was well known.

He sacked Mandelson in September 2025 after new details emerged about the depth of Mandelson's ties to Epstein, who died in prison in 2019 while facing sex-trafficking charges.

UK police are investigating allegations of misconduct in office by Mandelson when he was a Labour minister more than 15 years ago. He was arrested and released in February.

Mandelson has not been charged and denies criminal wrongdoing.