عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
Arab World

Kurdish Iranian Dissidents in Iraq Deny Attack Plans but Say They Would Join a US Invasion of Iran

Members of the Kurdistan Freedom Party PAK stand guard in Erbil, Iraq, Thursday, March 5, 2026. (AP)
Members of the Kurdistan Freedom Party PAK stand guard in Erbil, Iraq, Thursday, March 5, 2026. (AP)
TT
TT

Kurdish Iranian Dissidents in Iraq Deny Attack Plans but Say They Would Join a US Invasion of Iran

Members of the Kurdistan Freedom Party PAK stand guard in Erbil, Iraq, Thursday, March 5, 2026. (AP)
Members of the Kurdistan Freedom Party PAK stand guard in Erbil, Iraq, Thursday, March 5, 2026. (AP)

Officials with one of the armed Kurdish Iranian dissident groups based in northern Iraq told The Associated Press that they are not planning an imminent cross-border attack on Iran but would join a ground invasion if the US were to launch one.

The comments appeared to be aimed at reassuring Iraqi Kurdish officials, who have said they do not want attacks to be launched against Iran from their territory, fearing that they will be further dragged into the war in the Middle East sparked by the US and Israel’s strikes on Iran.

In the event of a US ground operation, “then we would enter alongside the coalition forces,” said Khalil Nadiri, an official with the Kurdistan Freedom Party PAK, in an interview with the AP Thursday. But he said, “The Kurds must not place themselves as the spearhead of the attack.”

He added that his group also has armed members already present inside of Iran and that they would not necessarily require cross-border support if they were to stage an uprising.

Nadiri said the Kurdish groups have been in contact with the US and Israel but denied having received any material aid from them.

The comments came after Kurdish officials said earlier this week that the Kurdish Iranian dissident groups based in northern Iraq are preparing for a potential cross-border military operation in Iran, and the US had asked Iraqi Kurds to support them

Rebaz Sharifi, a military commander with the PAK, said it would be “a very positive development” if the US and its allies were to arm the Kurdish groups, but also denied that they have received any such support so far.

Sharifi said he expects that at some point, US President Donald Trump “might want the peshmerga forces of Eastern Kurdistan to participate in the conflict during a ground invasion” and “if it reaches that point, we, for our part, would be pleased with it.”

However, the two officials sought to dispel the fears of Iraqi Kurdish officials that Iraq’s semiautonomous Kurdish region would be used as a launching pad.

Peshawa Hawramani, spokesperson for the Kurdistan Regional Government, said in a statement earlier this week that “allegations claiming that we are part of a plan to arm and send Kurdish opposition parties into Iranian territory are completely unfounded” and that the Iraqi Kurdish parties do not want to “expand the war and tensions in the region.”

Already Iran and allied Iraqi militias have launched dozens of missiles and drone attacks into northern Iraq, targeting the US bases and consulate in Irbil as well as bases of the Iranian Kurdish dissident groups.

Sharifi said PAK's bases have been attacked twice with ballistic missiles and four times with drones since the start of the war, killing one of their fighters and wounding three others.

Nadiri said that “since the (Iraqi) Kurdistan region has adopted a policy of not becoming a part of this conflict and because we do not want to disrupt the stability and security here and we respect the laws of this region, consequently, the environment has not yet been established for us to move our forces back into Eastern Kurdistan.”

He was using the term used by Kurdish groups to refer to the Kurdish region of Iran.

The potential military involvement of the Kurds has raised tensions with other Iranian opposition groups - notably the faction led by the former shah’s son, Reza Pahlavi, who has accused the Kurds of being separatists aiming to carve up Iran.

Sharifi said that his group's “ultimate goal is the statehood of the Kurds in all four regions and the reunification of Kurdistan,” referring to the Kurdish areas that are currently split among Iran, Iraq, Türkiyeand Syria.

Nadiri said that a confederal system could be a “viable solution” that would allow the Kurdish area to remain part of Iran while maintaining its “own sovereignty, identity, and unique characteristics.”

Most Viewed

 
 
Arab World

Damascus Foils Smuggling of 6,000 Detonators to Lebanon

Tunnel found in Homs countryside linking Qusayr to Lebanon (Syrian media)
Tunnel found in Homs countryside linking Qusayr to Lebanon (Syrian media)
TT
TT

Damascus Foils Smuggling of 6,000 Detonators to Lebanon

Tunnel found in Homs countryside linking Qusayr to Lebanon (Syrian media)
Tunnel found in Homs countryside linking Qusayr to Lebanon (Syrian media)

Syrian authorities said they had thwarted an attempt to smuggle a large shipment of military-grade detonators from the Nabk area in the Qalamoun region of rural Damascus into Lebanon.

They also uncovered a cross-border tunnel and seized weapons depots prepared for smuggling, state media reported on Wednesday.

The Internal Security Directorate in Nabk said it dismantled a plan to move a large quantity of explosive detonators used in making improvised explosive devices, adding the shipment was bound for Lebanon.

In a statement, it said the operation was carried out with “high professionalism” after precise technical and field surveillance, preventing the materials from reaching their destination.

Authorities said about 6,000 detonators were seized, without identifying the smugglers or the intended recipients in Lebanon.

The announcement came as internal security forces in Homs reported discovering a tunnel linking Syrian and Lebanese territory in the border town of Housh al-Sayyed Ali, in the Qusayr area of southern Homs province.

Weapons and ammunition depots prepared for smuggling were also seized, according to the Syrian Al-Ikhbariya channel, which gave no details on who dug the tunnel.

Earlier this month, Syria’s defense ministry said it had uncovered a network of tunnels in the Qusayr area used to smuggle drugs and weapons, adding that Hezbollah had used them.

Qusayr has been one of Hezbollah’s main areas of influence in Syria since 2013, until the fall of its ally Bashar al-Assad. The area served as a key supply route from Albu Kamal on the Iraqi border in Deir al-Zor, through Palmyra and Homs, to the Lebanese border.

Media reports say tunnels are widespread along the Qusayr border, alongside informal crossings used by residents to move between the two countries. For many, smuggling has become a source of income amid worsening economic conditions, poverty, and security instability, complicating efforts to secure the border.

The developments come amid fears Syria could be drawn into a wider conflict through Lebanon and efforts to disarm Hezbollah, with backing from the United States and Israel.

On April 11, Syria’s interior ministry said its counterterrorism department, working with internal security in rural Damascus, arrested five people in a cell linked to Hezbollah after tracking suspicious activity in the capital.

Authorities said a woman in the cell was caught attempting to carry out an attack by planting an explosive device near the home of a religious figure in Bab Touma, close to the Mariamite Cathedral. Media reports identified the target as Rabbi Michael Houri.

Earlier this month, the defense ministry allowed a photographer from Agence France-Presse to document the army’s deployment along the border for the first time since reinforcements were sent about a month earlier, including several cross-border tunnels that had recently been uncovered.

Mohammad Hammoud, a Syrian-Lebanese border official, told AFP the army had discovered “a network of tunnels linking the two countries” used to smuggle weapons and drugs. A Syrian army field commander also said Hezbollah had used the tunnels.

Hezbollah fought alongside Assad’s forces in the conflict that began in 2011 as a peaceful uprising before escalating into war.

An AFP photographer saw at least five tunnels crossing the border, including one that started in a house basement and led via concrete steps into narrow, dark passageways used for transit.

On March 28, Syrian authorities said they found a tunnel near a village west of Homs linking Syria to Lebanon, adding that “Lebanese militias” had used it for smuggling before it was closed.

In February, the interior ministry said it dismantled a cell behind attacks in the Mezzeh district of Damascus, adding the weapons used had come from Hezbollah, which denied involvement.

Arab World

Beirut MPs Meet to Back Weapons-Free City Declaration

Lebanese army soldiers deploy at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Beirut (AP)
Lebanese army soldiers deploy at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Beirut (AP)
TT
TT

Beirut MPs Meet to Back Weapons-Free City Declaration

Lebanese army soldiers deploy at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Beirut (AP)
Lebanese army soldiers deploy at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Beirut (AP)

Beirut lawmakers and political parties in Lebanon’s parliament will hold a conference on Thursday backing a declaration of the capital as “safe and free of weapons,” after a government decision that followed deadly Israeli attacks on the city last week.

Organizers invited all Beirut MPs except those from Hezbollah and the Islamic Group, in a move targeting the party’s arms after the government banned its military activities.

The gathering also signals support for Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who came under attack from Hezbollah after the decision.

Organizers told Asharq Al-Awsat that rejecting the targeting of Salam reflects that the move “expresses the decisions of the Council of Ministers collectively.”

Beirut MPs are expected to endorse government efforts to assert state sovereignty and cement the state’s exclusive authority over decisions of war and peace. This includes measures tied to Hezbollah, notably limiting arms to legitimate state forces.

They will also back the executive authority, represented by the president, prime minister, and cabinet, in declaring Beirut a weapons-free city, and call for a strong, comprehensive deployment of the Lebanese army and security forces to protect citizens and prevent any unauthorized arms or threats to stability.

MP Fouad Makhzoumi said the Israeli attack last Wednesday, while condemned, underscored the risks to the city’s security.

“There is no solution except to place all weapons under the control of the state, including Hezbollah’s arms. This is the gateway to strengthening stability and protecting all Lebanese,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Makhzoumi said Beirut MPs fully support the decision and stressed the need for full, uncompromising implementation.

He called for a robust deployment of the army and security forces, warning against any leniency in enforcing measures he said would protect the city, its residents, and people displaced from southern Lebanon and other areas hit by Israeli attacks.

Last week, Beirut MPs, along with economic bodies and civil society groups, called for the conference to present a unified stance on developments, reaffirm the state’s role, and press for implementation of government decisions to protect the capital, its institutions, and residents.

In a statement, they condemned Israeli strikes on Lebanese territory, including Beirut, and rejected dragging Lebanon into a war “that has nothing to do with it,” while backing government steps to reinforce sovereignty and stability.

They also denounced incitement and unrest in Beirut, saying it endangers residents and threatens security, and reiterated their commitment to national unity and rejection of sectarian strife.

Arab World

Ambassadors Set to Meet Again Ahead of Launch of Lebanon-Israel Negotiations

From left, Michael Needham, counselor for the US Dept. of State, US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa, Lebanese Ambassador to the US Nada Hamadeh Moawad, and Israeli Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter pose for a photo before a meeting at the State Department in Washington, Tuesday, April 14, 2026. (AP)
From left, Michael Needham, counselor for the US Dept. of State, US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa, Lebanese Ambassador to the US Nada Hamadeh Moawad, and Israeli Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter pose for a photo before a meeting at the State Department in Washington, Tuesday, April 14, 2026. (AP)
TT
TT

Ambassadors Set to Meet Again Ahead of Launch of Lebanon-Israel Negotiations

From left, Michael Needham, counselor for the US Dept. of State, US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa, Lebanese Ambassador to the US Nada Hamadeh Moawad, and Israeli Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter pose for a photo before a meeting at the State Department in Washington, Tuesday, April 14, 2026. (AP)
From left, Michael Needham, counselor for the US Dept. of State, US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa, Lebanese Ambassador to the US Nada Hamadeh Moawad, and Israeli Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter pose for a photo before a meeting at the State Department in Washington, Tuesday, April 14, 2026. (AP)

Lebanon’s and Israel’s ambassadors to Washington are preparing for a second meeting after an initial round on Tuesday at the US State Department, hosted by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

The meeting is aimed at shaping talks and securing a ceasefire pushed by Washington before launching a negotiation track between the two countries.

Lebanon is pressing ahead with direct negotiations with Israel under US sponsorship, describing it as the only viable option to end the war, as the military track has stalled and failed to secure a ceasefire for 45 days, according to ministerial sources following the talks.

The sources said Washington is acting as “mediator, facilitator, and driver of the talks,” while also “pressuring Tel Aviv to implement a ceasefire.”

Rubio launched the talks on Tuesday, attended by Lebanon’s ambassador to Washington, Nada Hamadeh Moawad, and Israel’s ambassador Yechiel Leiter.

He described the meeting as the beginning of a long process aimed at reaching a final solution to Hezbollah’s influence in the region, rather than merely securing a ceasefire.

Second meeting

Lebanese ministerial sources said the first session marked “the start of a process aimed at reaching a ceasefire agreement that would pave the way for negotiations under a mechanism to be agreed upon.”

They stressed the meeting was not a negotiating round, but a launch of the process, to be followed by setting a date for formal talks.

The sources revealed a second meeting would be held between the two ambassadors under US mediation to cement a ceasefire and continue the process afterward.

Rubio cautioned that the complexities of the conflict would not be resolved in a single day, framing the meeting as a “process” to lay the groundwork for future peace.

However, the sources said the atmosphere was “not tense and did not produce negative signals,” adding that Rubio “played a key role in backing the Lebanese position on implementing a ceasefire and strongly pushed for meeting Lebanon’s condition to move the file forward toward negotiations.”

Freedom of action

Lebanon is insisting on implementing the ceasefire agreement reached in November 2024, which it says Israel violated.

According to Asharq Al-Awsat sources, Beirut is demanding an end to Israeli assassinations, warnings, and attacks carried out over the past 15 months, demands Israel rejects as it insists on maintaining “freedom of action.”

The sources said the Israeli side presented its own vision, while Lebanon presented its demands through Moawad, with the US side speaking before the exchange of ideas began.

Rubio then intervened to support the Lebanese push for a ceasefire, they added, describing the US role as “more than a facilitator,” with the secretary of state acting as a driver of the talks.

The ambassadors’ role is expected to conclude once a ceasefire is secured, after which a formal negotiation will begin at a location yet to be determined. Participants have already been agreed upon by both sides, with technical committees to be formed later for follow-up and discussions.

Framework agreement

A framework agreement for negotiations is expected once a ceasefire is reached. Lebanon’s priorities begin with an Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories, followed by the return of residents, reconstruction, and the release of detainees. Israel, however, insists on disarming Hezbollah during these stages.

Lebanese estimates suggest progress would be step-by-step, with each issue addressed before moving to the next.

For Lebanon, the track represents the only available path to end the war, death, and destruction.

Despite opposition from Hezbollah, Beirut points to precedents of direct negotiations, including the 1949 armistice agreement; the May 17, 1983 talks; the Madrid and Washington negotiations in 1993; and UN-sponsored maritime border talks in 2022, where representatives of both sides sat in the same room without addressing each other directly, instead speaking through US or UN mediators.

Political backing

The negotiation track has garnered domestic political support, except from Hezbollah.

Interior Minister Ahmad al-Hajjar said Lebanon’s priority is reaching a ceasefire, stressing the importance of support from friendly and allied countries, as well as the key role of UN agencies, particularly as more than one million Lebanese have been displaced during the conflict.

The Kataeb party welcomed the launch of direct negotiations under US sponsorship, calling it “the only way to secure a ceasefire, end hostilities, ensure Israel’s withdrawal from occupied areas in southern Lebanon, enable displaced residents to return, achieve stability in Lebanon, and establish peace.”

It stressed the need for the Lebanese state to continue implementing its decisions on seizing all illegal weapons and banning Hezbollah’s military and security activities across Lebanese territory.