Iraqi PM Takes De-Escalation Initiative to Tehran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian (R) receives Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi in Tehran on July 23, 2026. (Iranian Presidency)
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian (R) receives Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi in Tehran on July 23, 2026. (Iranian Presidency)
TT

Iraqi PM Takes De-Escalation Initiative to Tehran

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian (R) receives Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi in Tehran on July 23, 2026. (Iranian Presidency)
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian (R) receives Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi in Tehran on July 23, 2026. (Iranian Presidency)

Iraq’s government spokesman said Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi carried an initiative to Tehran aimed at easing regional tensions, while Baghdad said it would not allow Iraqi territory to be used to threaten Iran.

The remarks came during an official visit by al-Zaidi to Tehran, about a week after he met US President Donald Trump in Washington.

Al-Zaidi arrived in Tehran on Thursday afternoon at the head of a high-level delegation and was welcomed by Iranian Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance Ali Madanizadeh, representing President Masoud Pezeshkian, according to the Iranian government’s official media website.

Pezeshkian received al-Zaidi at an official ceremony at Tehran’s Saadabad Palace, where the national anthems of both countries were played and the two leaders reviewed a guard of honor.

Al-Zaidi said he had discussed several issues of mutual interest with Pezeshkian, including establishing a mechanism for the work of the Iraqi-Iranian Joint Economic Committee.

He said his visit reflected the depth of bilateral relations and renewed them, describing the trip as a bridge of friendship between the two peoples and pointing to the two countries’ shared religion, civilization, geography and culture.

Al-Zaidi said the visit was intended to discuss bilateral and regional issues and called for joint investments in various sectors.

Pezeshkian said security and stability were highly important and would have a positive effect on bilateral development. He also pointed to significant joint investment opportunities between the two countries.

Al-Zaidi and Pezeshkian oversaw the signing in Tehran of four agreements and memoranda of understanding aimed at strengthening bilateral cooperation and partnership between the neighboring countries.

The agreements, signed on behalf of Iraq by the foreign and electricity ministers and the acting ministers of finance and planning, included freight shipping and the international overland transport of goods, a memorandum of understanding to extend the Kermanshah-Khosravi-Khanaqin-Baghdad railway and a twinning agreement between the Baghdad and Tehran municipalities.

“Impressions from Washington”

Al-Zaidi conveyed to Iranian officials “views and impressions from his recent visit to Washington,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said.

“Iran’s current problem with the United States is not one of mediation,” Araghchi said in remarks carried by Iranian television.

“The problem lies in the nature of the US approach, which is unreasonable and based on excessive demands and domination,” he added.

Media reports had suggested that the Iraqi prime minister might be carrying a message to the Iranian side, but there was no official confirmation.

Iraqi initiative

Iraqi government spokesman Haider al-Aboudi told Asharq Al-Awsat that al-Zaidi had carried “an initiative aimed at achieving stability in the region, including de-escalation.”

“Iraq maintains balanced relations within its regional and international environment and uses them to support regional stability and create a comprehensive opportunity for regional development,” al-Aboudi said.

Before leaving for Tehran, al-Zaidi said in a post on X that he was traveling there to discuss issues of mutual interest, bilateral cooperation, regional developments and efforts to consolidate security and stability in the region.

“Iraq and Iran share historical and civilizational ties, a geographical border and common interests,” he said.

“This requires continued work in a spirit of dialogue, cooperation and mutual respect, in a way that strengthens sustainable development and prosperity for the peoples of both countries and supports security and stability in the region and the world.”

Former Iraqi Electricity Minister Luay al-Khatteeb, however, ruled out any clear economic breakthrough “under the current conditions of war in the region, whose trajectory is difficult to predict because of the lack of visibility.”

He said challenges arising after attacks on Iranian energy installations and infrastructure would increasingly have a negative effect on Iranian electricity and gas supplies to Iraq.

Politically, al-Khatteeb said the visit's importance lay in preserving a balance in Iraq’s relations with its strategic allies, both regionally and internationally.

He said the trip also amounted to accepting an invitation to a protocol intended to strengthen relations between al-Zaidi’s newly formed government and the Iranian government.

Asked whether Iraq could play an active mediation role in the ongoing war, al-Khatteeb said its role was limited to Tehran’s influence over armed factions in Iraq and the importance of integrating them into the political system and state institutions.

He said regional diplomatic efforts would remain primarily in the hands of Oman and Pakistan, along with other regional countries.

What do experts say?

Yassin al-Bakri, a professor of political science at Al-Nahrain University, told Asharq Al-Awsat that al-Zaidi’s visits to Washington and then Tehran were interconnected and followed the usual pattern of previous Iraqi prime ministers seeking to balance relations with both sides.

Al-Bakri said it was unclear whether Washington had asked Iraq to play a role in the current crisis.

“But it may be an opportunity for Iraq to try to insert itself into this issue, despite its difficulty,” he said.

“Iran understands that Washington is working forcefully to pull Iraq out of its sphere of influence and may believe that the United States intends to turn Iraq into a buffer and revive its role as a strategic counterweight to Iran.”

Media professor Ghalib al-Daami told Asharq Al-Awsat that Tehran viewed al-Zaidi as “a final opportunity and a lifeline, particularly after the recent faltering of negotiations led by Pakistan.”

“The concealed purpose of the visit is for al-Zaidi to inform the Iranian side of the need to withdraw its backing from the armed factions so their weapons can be brought under state control, and to continue the anti-corruption campaign, in return for Iraq assuming a mediation role,” al-Daami said.

Government spokesman al-Aboudi had said the government did not intend to discuss placing all weapons under state control during the visit.

“Bringing weapons under state control is an Iraqi sovereign matter and is not discussed in other capitals,” he said.

Local reports had suggested that al-Zaidi might ask Tehran to pressure armed factions to surrender missiles and drones and close what the government describes as the “uncontrolled weapons” file before the end of September.

The Iraqi government has not confirmed those reports.

During his visit to Washington, al-Zaidi told The Atlantic that Iraq was seeking to adopt an approach focused on investment and economic development to confront the consequences of regional tensions.

He said the closure of the Strait of Hormuz had caused financial losses exceeding $50 billion, placing further pressure on Iraq’s public finances.



Palestinian Authorities Say Israeli Army Kills Teen in West Bank

Mourners carry the body of Palestinian Islam Ajouri, 14, at Rafidia Hospital in Nablus in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, on August 23, 2026. (Photo by JAAFAR ASHTIYEH / AFP)
Mourners carry the body of Palestinian Islam Ajouri, 14, at Rafidia Hospital in Nablus in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, on August 23, 2026. (Photo by JAAFAR ASHTIYEH / AFP)
TT

Palestinian Authorities Say Israeli Army Kills Teen in West Bank

Mourners carry the body of Palestinian Islam Ajouri, 14, at Rafidia Hospital in Nablus in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, on August 23, 2026. (Photo by JAAFAR ASHTIYEH / AFP)
Mourners carry the body of Palestinian Islam Ajouri, 14, at Rafidia Hospital in Nablus in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, on August 23, 2026. (Photo by JAAFAR ASHTIYEH / AFP)

Israel's military killed a Palestinian teenager in the occupied West Bank on Sunday, Palestinian health authorities said, while an Israeli and a Palestinian were wounded in separate incidents.

Israeli gunfire killed Islam Ahmad Maher Ajouri, 14, in the Askar refugee camp where he lived, outside Nablus in the north of the West Bank, the Palestinian health ministry announced.

Mohammed Abu Kashk, head of the Askar camp services committee, told AFP that the teenager was killed by Israeli forces during a raid on the camp.

"There were no clashes or confrontations that would justify shooting a child and killing him," he said.

According to a source from the Palestinian Red Crescent, Ajouri was hit in the chest by live ammunition. He was pronounced dead at Nablus National Hospital.

At his funeral, his uncle Ahmed Mohamed Zamzoum told AFP that the boy went outside during the army raid. "Every time the Israeli forces enter, one or more martyrs are killed," he said.

The Israeli army told AFP it was verifying the information.

In a separate incident, the army said it apprehended a man suspected of stabbing an Israeli earlier on Sunday in Al-Auja, in the central West Bank.

Israeli rescue service Magen David Adom said the 24-year-old victim had "a penetrating wound".

The man was evacuated to a hospital in Jerusalem, and his condition was described as "moderate".

According to the initial findings of the investigation, the victim parked near a shopping center and was "attacked from behind and stabbed in the shoulder", Israeli police said in a statement.

Hani Najum, the head of the Al-Auja village council, told AFP that "the Israeli army raided the village, deployed in its streets" and imposed a curfew.

In a third incident, the army reported that a "terrorist" attempted "to steal a weapon from an IDF soldier" near the Palestinian town of Taybeh, northeast of Ramallah, and that forces opened fire at the man, saying he was "neutralized".

Palestinian sources told AFP that the man, Aws Akram Maatan, from the village of Burqa east of Ramallah, suffered an injury to his foot and was taken to a Jerusalem hospital for treatment.

The head of the Burqa village council, Sayel Kanaan, said in a statement that Maatan had been shot "without justification".

Violence has surged in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967, since the start of the war in Gaza sparked by Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel.

Israeli soldiers or settlers have killed at least 1,100 Palestinians since then, according to an AFP tally based on data from the Palestinian health ministry.

Over the same period, at least 48 Israelis have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military operations, according to Israeli figures.


Tunisia Says Recovered 11 Migrants' Drowned Bodies

African migrants rescued by the Tunisian coast guard in October (AFP)
African migrants rescued by the Tunisian coast guard in October (AFP)
TT

Tunisia Says Recovered 11 Migrants' Drowned Bodies

African migrants rescued by the Tunisian coast guard in October (AFP)
African migrants rescued by the Tunisian coast guard in October (AFP)

The Tunisian national guard said Sunday it recovered 11 bodies from the sea after a boat carrying migrants sank off the country's southeastern coast, with three people still missing.

The boat was carrying 15 people, only one of whom was rescued after it sank some 14 nautical miles off the shore of Zarzis on Friday night.

"Search operations resulted in the recovery of three bodies yesterday and eight bodies today, bringing the total to 11," the national guard said in a statement.

Searches for the three remaining missing passengers were ongoing, it added.

On Saturday night, residents in Ben Guerdane -- the marginalized city near the Libyan border where 14 of the migrants were from -- staged protests, blocking roads and setting tires on fire over the shipwreck.

Tunisia, whose coast is some 145 kilometers (90 miles) from the Italian island of Lampedusa, is a key departure point for migrants seeking to make the perilous journey across the Mediterranean in search of better lives in Europe.

The central Mediterranean crossing is the deadliest migration route in the world, according to the International Organization for Migration (IOM).

The IOM said earlier this month that the number of migrant deaths on the central Mediterranean route had more than doubled in the first four months of 2026 compared to the same period last year.

At least 914 migrants have died or gone missing along the route this year, according to the IOM.

In 2023, Tunisia signed a 255-million-euro ($290 million) deal with the European Union, nearly half of which was earmarked for tackling irregular migration.

The deal, strongly supported by Italy's hard-right government, aimed to bolster Tunisia's capacity to prevent boats leaving its shore.
 


The 'Ali al-Taher' Battle: A Test of Hezbollah’s Capabilities

A protester shouts slogans while holding a portrait of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah during a protest against the backdrop of Lebanon-Israel talks and the normalization of relations, in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, Aug. 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)
A protester shouts slogans while holding a portrait of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah during a protest against the backdrop of Lebanon-Israel talks and the normalization of relations, in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, Aug. 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)
TT

The 'Ali al-Taher' Battle: A Test of Hezbollah’s Capabilities

A protester shouts slogans while holding a portrait of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah during a protest against the backdrop of Lebanon-Israel talks and the normalization of relations, in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, Aug. 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)
A protester shouts slogans while holding a portrait of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah during a protest against the backdrop of Lebanon-Israel talks and the normalization of relations, in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, Aug. 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)

The battle for the “Ali al-Taher” heights is placing Hezbollah before a difficult test that goes beyond its ability to defend the hill and prevent its fall. It also tests the effectiveness of the military strategies it has recently developed after conventional strategies failed over the past two years to counter Israel’s military and technological superiority.

Can Israel, through firepower, air power and surveillance, suffocate the force deployed in the area and undermine the conditions needed for its survival? Or can the underground fortifications, tunnels, storage facilities and combat capabilities prepared by Hezbollah give it room to continue wearing down Israeli forces and prolong the confrontation?

Ability to Maneuver

Retired Brigadier General Bahaa Hallal says that, regarding Hezbollah’s military position, “the land still has strategic value for it, but its defensive value automatically declines if it shifts from a controlled area to an exposed area under surveillance.” He explains: “The party’s core strength is not simply holding the hilltop, but its ability to operate in depth and particularly in the surrounding area, while Israel seeks to turn its air and intelligence superiority into permanent ground superiority.”

Hallal told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the main challenge facing Hezbollah is maintaining its ability to maneuver. If Israel manages to establish a presence, impose a buffer zone around the hill and prevent the party from moving, the balance of power will gradually begin to shift in its favor.”

In this context, underground fortifications are among the most important tools available to the defender. They can reduce the impact of air superiority, preserve a degree of continuity and survivability, and prevent the battle from being decided simply by control of the ground surface. Hallal cautions, however, that fortifications that provide protection from bombardment can become a burden if the area around them becomes besieged or isolated.

Isolated Pockets?

According to Hallal, this raises the central question in the “Ali al-Taher” battle: “Do the underground facilities still constitute an integrated network for maneuvering and communication, or have they become isolated pockets?”

Hallal says the ability to make decisions, communicate and implement them, while maintaining communication channels under pressure, will be among the main challenges facing Hezbollah. However, Hezbollah’s model, historically based on a degree of decentralization and flexibility, may mean that targeting a local position or commander would not necessarily be enough to bring down the entire system.

Hallal says the party’s strengths include geographical knowledge, organizational depth, the ability to exploit the mountainous terrain, and the capacity to continue operating despite losing positions. By contrast, he identifies Israel’s superiority in surveillance and air power, as well as the risk of isolation, as its main weaknesses.

He says that if Israel succeeds in separating “Ali al-Taher” from Hezbollah’s broader operational theater, the force there will face a more difficult defensive situation. He also considers the destruction of villages, roads and homes to be a major strategic pressure because it strikes part of the social and geographical environment in which any local force operates.

A Network of Tunnels

Retired Brigadier General George Nader describes the “Ali al-Taher” hill as being of major tactical importance because it overlooks a wide area north of the Litani River and large parts of the area south of it. He also points to its historical significance, as it was previously under Israeli occupation.

Nader told Asharq Al-Awsat that, according to the information on which he relies, the hill is an important position for the command of the Radwan Forces. It contains underground facilities and a network of tunnels linked to ammunition, logistics, missiles, drones, fighters and operations rooms.

A Bargaining Chip in Negotiations

Nader believes that Israeli control of the hill would give Israel greater leverage and a greater ability to impose its terms in future rounds of negotiations, particularly if it manages to turn military control into an established reality on the ground.

He believes Israel’s destructive and technological capabilities make the targeting of these facilities and tunnels a possibility, warning that the presence of large quantities of ammunition and missiles in the area could mean that any large-scale destruction operation would have major repercussions.

Major Israeli Attack

Based on this, Nader expects a major Israeli attack to seize the hill, considering that the objective could have political implications for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who seeks to use control of the site to demonstrate that he has succeeded in striking Hezbollah’s command center in the south, thereby enhancing the security of the northern settlements on the eve of Israeli electoral events.

As for Hezbollah’s options in response, Nader believes they appear limited given the difficulty of movement south of the Litani River. This, in his assessment, makes it difficult to divert Israeli forces or force them to disperse their efforts by opening other fronts of movement in the area.