Is the US Serious About Destroying the Houthis’ Military Capabilities?

Many Yemenis are skeptical of Washington’s commitment to weaken the military capabilities of the Houthis in Yemen. (AP)
Many Yemenis are skeptical of Washington’s commitment to weaken the military capabilities of the Houthis in Yemen. (AP)
TT

Is the US Serious About Destroying the Houthis’ Military Capabilities?

Many Yemenis are skeptical of Washington’s commitment to weaken the military capabilities of the Houthis in Yemen. (AP)
Many Yemenis are skeptical of Washington’s commitment to weaken the military capabilities of the Houthis in Yemen. (AP)

Many Yemenis are skeptical of Washington’s commitment to weaken the military capabilities of the Houthis in Yemen. They see the recent strikes on military sites in five Yemeni provinces as nothing more than a proportional response to an attack on a single destroyer.

Expecting a limited impact from the strikes, Yemeni observers compared them to the US approach against Iranian-backed groups in Iraq.

Col. Sadeq Dweid, the spokesperson for the National Resistance Forces led by Gen. Tareq Saleh, a member of Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council (PLC), dismissed the recent airstrikes by the US and UK on Houthi targets as “not serious.”

He argued that foreign intervention is “not a solution and is unacceptable.”

Dweid said these strikes are part of internal maneuvering, emphasizing instead the importance of supporting the Yemeni government as the only legitimate representative of the country.

Many activists and residents share this view, believing that Washinton’s announcement to the Houthis that it intends to retaliate against them is confirmation that the aim wasn’t the destruction of the militias’ military capabilities, but simply a response to their targeting of an American destroyer in the Red Sea.

The militias had fired 24 drones and six ballistic and naval missiles against the vessel.

Yemeni journalist Fares Al-Humairi said the US and British strikes on Houthi-held areas hit positions which are not of strategic importance and others which don’t offer any support to the operations the militias are carrying out in the Red Sea.

Before the strikes, the Houthis moved weapons, including over 100 naval missiles, from dismantled military bases in Hodeidah to storage facilities, noted Al-Humairi.

Yemeni teacher Ahmed Abdulhameed said the US will handle the Houthis the same way it handled Iranian groups in Iraq - responding with limited strikes to each provocation.

He noted that Washington chooses to overlook the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in Iraq even though it an Iran-aligned group.

Abdullah Yahya echoed these remarks, saying the targeted locations hold no military significance to the Houthis.

Moreover, he explained that the militias, with help from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah, are experienced in disassembling rockets and concealing them in caves or the dense palm tree farms near the Red Seas coast.



Israel Warfare Methods 'Consistent With Genocide', Says UN Committee

Israel's warfare practices in Gaza "are consistent with the characteristics of genocide", according to the United Nations Special Committee - AFP
Israel's warfare practices in Gaza "are consistent with the characteristics of genocide", according to the United Nations Special Committee - AFP
TT

Israel Warfare Methods 'Consistent With Genocide', Says UN Committee

Israel's warfare practices in Gaza "are consistent with the characteristics of genocide", according to the United Nations Special Committee - AFP
Israel's warfare practices in Gaza "are consistent with the characteristics of genocide", according to the United Nations Special Committee - AFP

Israel's warfare in Gaza is consistent with the characteristics of genocide, a special UN committee said Thursday, accusing the country of "using starvation as a method of war".

The United Nations Special Committee pointed to "mass civilian casualties and life-threatening conditions intentionally imposed on Palestinians", in a fresh report covering the period from Hamas's deadly October 7 attack in Israel last year through to July, AFP reported.

"Through its siege over Gaza, obstruction of humanitarian aid, alongside targeted attacks and killing of civilians and aid workers, despite repeated UN appeals, binding orders from the International Court of Justice and resolutions of the Security Council, Israel is intentionally causing death, starvation and serious injury," it said in a statement.

Israel's warfare practices in Gaza "are consistent with the characteristics of genocide", said the committee, which has for decades been investigating Israeli practices affecting rights in the occupied Palestinian territories.

Israel, it charged, was "using starvation as a method of war and inflicting collective punishment on the Palestinian population".

A UN-backed assessment at the weekend warned that famine was imminent in northern Gaza.

Thursday's report documented how Israel's extensive bombing campaign in Gaza had decimated essential services and unleashed an environmental catastrophe with lasting health impacts.

By February this year, Israeli forces had used more than 25,000 tonnes of explosives across the Gaza Strip, "equivalent to two nuclear bombs", the report pointed out.

"By destroying vital water, sanitation and food systems, and contaminating the environment, Israel has created a lethal mix of crises that will inflict severe harm on generations to come," the committee said.

The committee said it was "deeply alarmed by the unprecedented destruction of civilian infrastructure and the high death toll in Gaza", where more than 43,700 people have been killed since the war began, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.

The staggering number of deaths raised serious concerns, it said, about Israel's use of artificial intelligence-enhanced targeting systems in its military operations.

"The Israeli military’s use of AI-assisted targeting, with minimal human oversight, combined with heavy bombs, underscores Israel’s disregard of its obligation to distinguish between civilians and combatants and take adequate safeguards to prevent civilian deaths," it said.

It warned that reported new directives lowering the criteria for selecting targets and increasing the previously accepted ratio of civilian to combatant casualties appeared to have allowed the military to use AI systems to "rapidly generate tens of thousands of targets, as well as to track targets to their homes, particularly at night when families shelter together".

The committee stressed the obligations of other countries to urgently act to halt the bloodshed, saying that "other States are unwilling to hold Israel accountable and continue to provide it with military and other support".