Tunisia’s Ben Jafar to Asharq Al-Awsat: Transfering Legislative Powers Temporarily to Govt is Constitutional

Former president of Tunisia's National Constituent Assembly Mustafa Ben Jafar (File photo: Reuters)
Former president of Tunisia's National Constituent Assembly Mustafa Ben Jafar (File photo: Reuters)
TT
20

Tunisia’s Ben Jafar to Asharq Al-Awsat: Transfering Legislative Powers Temporarily to Govt is Constitutional

Former president of Tunisia's National Constituent Assembly Mustafa Ben Jafar (File photo: Reuters)
Former president of Tunisia's National Constituent Assembly Mustafa Ben Jafar (File photo: Reuters)

Tunisia’s Former President of the Constituent Assembly Mustapha Ben Jafar argued that transfering legislative powers temporarily to Prime Minister Elyes Fakhfakh, according to Chapter 70 of the constitution, is a “legal political measure imposed by the exceptional stage that the country and the world are going through.”

Ben Jafar said the step was equal to President Kais Saied’s usage of Chapter 80 which considers the country in a dangerous state that requires exceptional measures.

In an interview with Asharq al-Awsat, Ben Jafar expected the political parties that opposed this measure to change their position and accept the comprehensive rescue and intervention plan announced by the government and supported by the president and speaker.

He also indicated that the current stage amid the coronavirus pandemic requires the government to pass laws and decisions even if they contradict with the popular opinion.

In 2011, interim President Fouad Mebazaa declared a state of emergency that enabled him to run the country through decrees and orders, he noted.

Ben Jafar downplayed the political repercussions reported in the Tunisian and international media about deep differences between the three presidents.

He indicated that the disagreements between Saied, Fakhfakh, and Speaker Rached Ghannouchi are secondary and merely procedural over some powers.

Ben Jafar said statements by officials close to the three presidents confirm their keenness over joint work, especially during this stage where the country and the world are facing health risks and signs of economic, social, political, and security crises.

For his part, Ben Jafar acknowledged the existence of “an issue of confidence” between some politicians, especially that the majority of citizens are now disappointed given that the reforms demanded by the youth of the revolution 10 years ago have not been implemented.

Asked about the government of Fakhfakh, Ben Jafar considered that the cabinet is the most democratic in the contemporary history of Tunisia because it includes well-known human rights and democracy figures.

He admitted that a large segment of the people, especially its youth, do not trust the authorities because of their lack of participation in public affairs and political life.

Ben Jafar expected coordination between the three presidents to improve immediately after the coronavirus pandemic has subsided, especially that everyone had discovered the efficacy of the latest decisions including lockdown, closing cafes, clubs, mosques, and airports.



Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
TT
20

Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon

The former US special envoy, Amos Hochstein, said the maritime border agreement struck between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 and the ceasefire deal reached between Israel and Hezbollah at the end of last year show that a land border demarcation “is within reach.”

“We can get to a deal but there has to be political willingness,” he said.

“The agreement of the maritime boundary was unique because we’d been trying to work on it for over 10 years,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I understood that a simple diplomatic push for a line was not going to work. It had to be a more complicated and comprehensive agreement. And there was a real threat that people didn’t realize that if we didn’t reach an agreement we would have ended up in a conflict - in a hot conflict - or war over resources.”

He said there is a possibility to reach a Lebanese-Israeli land border agreement because there’s a “provision that mandated the beginning of talks on the land boundary.”

“I believe with concerted effort they can be done quickly,” he said, adding: “It is within reach.”

Hochstein described communication with Hezbollah as “complicated,” saying “I never had only one interlocutor with Hezbollah .... and the first step is to do shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon, Lebanon and Lebanon, and then you had to go to Israel and do shuttle diplomacy between the different factions” there.

“The reality of today and the reality of 2022 are different. Hezbollah had a lock on the political system in Lebanon in the way it doesn’t today.”

North of Litani

The 2024 ceasefire agreement requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and for the Lebanese army to take full operational control of the south Litani region, all the way up to the border. It requires Hezbollah to demilitarize and move further north of the Litani region, he said.

“I don’t want to get into the details of other violations,” he said, but stated that the ceasefire works if both conditions are met.

Lebanon’s opportunity

“Lebanon can rewrite its future ... but it has to be a fundamental change,” he said.

“There is so much potential in Lebanon and if you can bring back opportunity and jobs - and through economic and legal reforms in the country - I think that the future is very bright,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Hezbollah is not trying to control the politics and remember that Hezbollah is just an arm of Iran” which “should not be imposing its political will in Lebanon, Israel should not be imposing its military will in Lebanon, Syria should not. No one should. This a moment for Lebanon to make decisions for itself,” he added.