Australia to Place First Far-Right Group on Terror List

Australia's domestic spy agency has repeatedly sounded the alarm about the growing threat of far-right violence | AFP
Australia's domestic spy agency has repeatedly sounded the alarm about the growing threat of far-right violence | AFP
TT

Australia to Place First Far-Right Group on Terror List

Australia's domestic spy agency has repeatedly sounded the alarm about the growing threat of far-right violence | AFP
Australia's domestic spy agency has repeatedly sounded the alarm about the growing threat of far-right violence | AFP

A Britain-based neo-Nazi outfit will become the first far-right organization to be listed as a terror group in Australia, authorities said Tuesday, after growing warnings from security services.

The Department of Home Affairs signaled that the Sonnenkrieg Division would join the current list of 27 proscribed organizations, which have so far been exclusively jihadist or separatist groups linked to the Middle East and central Asia.

Australia's domestic spy agency has repeatedly sounded the alarm about the growing threat of far-right violence.

Since an Australian gunman killed 51 worshippers at mosques in New Zealand's Christchurch in 2019, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation has said the far-right threat had "increased" and become an "enduring threat".

But until now the country's conservative government has been reluctant to formally designate any organizations as terror groups.

The move means that being a member of the Sonnenkrieg Division or helping the organization financially will be outlawed.

Home affairs minister Peter Dutton said the Sonnenkrieg Division, or SKD, had "a presence that we're particularly worried about in the UK".

"Their reach goes into the minds of young people and Australians here," he told Nine News.

Officials indicated the process of designating the group would be completed in the coming days.

Extremism experts at US-based George Washington University have described the Sonnenkrieg Division as "tiny" and an offshoot of much larger organizations.

The group did gain some notoriety in 2018 for suggesting Britain's Prince Harry -- whose wife is mixed race African-American -- was a "race traitor", leading to it being banned in Britain in February 2020.

British authorities said SKD was formed in 2018 as a splinter group of National Action, also known as the System Resistance Network.

Australia's opposition Labor party questioned why SKD -- which is believed to have only a dozen members in Britain -- was listed rather than several larger and more prominent organizations.

"They are a UK-based group that has little or no direct links to Australia," shadow home affairs minister Kristina Keneally said, calling for further designations.

Keneally said the government had "sought to dismiss, downplay or ignore the threat of right-wing extremism".

Authorities have warned that militant far-right groups are becoming more global, with ideologies being rapidly spread across borders via online message boards and other digital platforms.

In March 2020, Australia charged two men linked to the far right with attempting to obtain military equipment and plotting a terrorist act.

According to Australian Federal Police, "the investigation also identified alleged social media links between one of these men and an individual in the United Kingdom".



Trump's Words on Greenland and Borders Ring Alarms in Europe, But Officials Have a Guarded Response

FILE PHOTO: Greenland's flag flies in Igaliku settlement, Greenland, July 5, 2024. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS
FILE PHOTO: Greenland's flag flies in Igaliku settlement, Greenland, July 5, 2024. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS
TT

Trump's Words on Greenland and Borders Ring Alarms in Europe, But Officials Have a Guarded Response

FILE PHOTO: Greenland's flag flies in Igaliku settlement, Greenland, July 5, 2024. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS
FILE PHOTO: Greenland's flag flies in Igaliku settlement, Greenland, July 5, 2024. Ritzau Scanpix/Ida Marie Odgaard via REUTERS

President-elect Donald Trump has tossed expansionist rhetoric at US allies and potential adversaries with arguments that the frontiers of American power need to be extended into Canada and the Danish territory of Greenland, and southward to include the Panama Canal.Trump's suggestions that international borders can be redrawn — by force if necessary — are particularly inflammatory in Europe. His words run contrary to the argument European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are trying to impress on Russian President Vladimir Putin.But many European leaders — who've learned to expect the unexpected from Trump and have seen that actions don't always follow his words — have been guarded in their response, with some taking a nothing-to-see-here view rather than vigorously defend European Union member Denmark.Analysts, though, say that even words can damage US-European relations ahead of Trump's second presidency.A diplomatic response in Europe Several officials in Europe — where governments depend on US trade, energy, investment, technology, and defense cooperation for security — emphasized their belief that Trump has no intention of marching troops into Greenland.“I think we can exclude that the United States in the coming years will try to use force to annex territory that interests it,” Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni said.German Chancellor Olaf Scholz pushed back — but carefully, saying “borders must not be moved by force" and not mentioning Trump by name.This week, as Ukrainian President Zelenskyy pressed Trump’s incoming administration to continue supporting Ukraine, he said: “No matter what’s going on in the world, everyone wants to feel sure that their country will not just be erased off the map.” Since Putin marched troops across Ukrainian borders in 2022, Zelenskyy and allies have been fighting — at great cost — to defend the principle that has underpinned the international order since World War II: that powerful nations can’t simply gobble up others.The British and French foreign ministers have said they can't foresee a US invasion of Greenland. Still, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot portrayed Trump’s remarks as a wake-up call."Do we think we’re entering into a period that sees the return of the law of the strongest?" the French minister said. “‘Yes."On Friday, the prime minister of Greenland — a semiautonomous Arctic territory that isn’t part of the EU but whose 56,000 residents are EU citizens, as part of Denmark — said its people don’t want to be Americans but that he’s open to greater cooperation with the US.“Cooperation is about dialogue," leader Múte B. Egede said.Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called the US "our closest ally” and said: “We have to stand together.”Analysts find Trump's words troubling European security analysts agreed there’s no real likelihood of Trump using the military against NATO ally Denmark, but nevertheless expressed profound disquiet.Analysts warned of turbulence ahead for trans-Atlantic ties, international norms and the NATO military alliance — not least because of the growing row with member Canada over Trump's repeated suggestions that it become a US state.“There is a possibility, of course, that this is just ... a new sheriff in town," said Flemming Splidsboel Hansen, who specializes in foreign policy, Russia and Greenland at the Danish Institute for International Studies. "I take some comfort from the fact that he is now insisting that Canada should be included in the US, which suggests that it is just sort of political bravado.“But damage has already been done. And I really cannot remember a previous incident like this where an important ally — in this case the most important ally — would threaten Denmark or another NATO member state.”Hansen said he fears NATO may be falling apart even before Trump's inauguration.“I worry about our understanding of a collective West," he said. "What does this even mean now? What may this mean just, say, one year from now, two years from now, or at least by the end of this second Trump presidency? What will be left?”Security concerns as possible motivation Some diplomats and analysts see a common thread in Trump's eyeing of Canada, the Panama Canal and Greenland: securing resources and waterways to strengthen the US against potential adversaries.Paris-based analyst Alix Frangeul-Alves said Trump's language is “all part of his ‘Make America Great Again’ mode.”In Greenland's soils, she noted, are rare earths critical for advanced and green technologies. China dominates global supplies of the valuable minerals, which the US, Europe and other nations view as a security risk.“Any policy made in Washington is made through the lens of the competition with China,” said Frangeul-Alves, who focuses on US politics for the German Marshall Fund.Some observers said Trump's suggested methods are fraught with peril.Security analyst Alexander Khara said Trump’s claim that “we need Greenland for national security purposes” reminded him of Putin's comments on Crimea when Russia seized the strategic Black Sea peninsula from Ukraine in 2014.Suggesting that borders might be flexible is “a completely dangerous precedent,” said Khara, director of the Centre for Defense Strategies in Kyiv.“We’re in a time of transition from the old system based on norms and principles,” he said, and “heading to more conflicts, more chaos and more uncertainty.”