Britain Begins ‘Large-scale’ Evacuation of Its Nationals From Sudan

Smoke is seen rise from buildings during clashes between the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces and the army in Khartoum North, Sudan. April 22, 2023. REUTERS/ Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
Smoke is seen rise from buildings during clashes between the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces and the army in Khartoum North, Sudan. April 22, 2023. REUTERS/ Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
TT
20

Britain Begins ‘Large-scale’ Evacuation of Its Nationals From Sudan

Smoke is seen rise from buildings during clashes between the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces and the army in Khartoum North, Sudan. April 22, 2023. REUTERS/ Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah
Smoke is seen rise from buildings during clashes between the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces and the army in Khartoum North, Sudan. April 22, 2023. REUTERS/ Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah

The British government said it had launched a large-scale evacuation of its citizens from Sudan on Tuesday, after the North African country's warring factions agreed to a 72-hour ceasefire.

Britain said military flights would depart from an airfield outside Khartoum, and would be open to those with British passports. Priority will be given to family groups with children, the elderly and individuals with medical conditions.

"The government has begun a large-scale evacuation of British passport holders from Sudan on RAF flights," Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said on Twitter. "I pay tribute to the British Armed Forces, diplomats and Border Force staff."

Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said the government had started contacting nationals directly and providing routes for departure out of the country, Reuters reported.

On Monday, the government estimated around 4,000 British nationals were in Sudan and armed forces minister James Heappey said there was a military team in the east of the country doing reconnaissance on possible options for helping Britons leave.

The Foreign Office said on Tuesday British nationals should not make their way to the airfield unless they were called, and warned the situation remained volatile, meaning the ability to conduct evacuations could change at short notice.

The British armed forces evacuated diplomatic staff and their family members from Sudan on Saturday and the government had come under criticism from British citizens still stuck there that they were not doing enough to help others get out.

Britain said it was working with its international partners to arrange the departure and would also continue to look at other potential options for helping British nationals leave Sudan.



Iran Downplays ‘Snapback’ Threat, Reserves Right to Respond

A photo released by the Iranian Parliament’s website of one of its meetings.
A photo released by the Iranian Parliament’s website of one of its meetings.
TT
20

Iran Downplays ‘Snapback’ Threat, Reserves Right to Respond

A photo released by the Iranian Parliament’s website of one of its meetings.
A photo released by the Iranian Parliament’s website of one of its meetings.

Iran sought on Friday to play down the potential impact of the so-called “snapback” mechanism, which allows for the automatic reimposition of United Nations sanctions on Tehran over its nuclear program, unless a diplomatic solution is reached by the end of August.

Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani, a member of the Iranian parliament’s Article 90 Committee, dismissed the measure as largely symbolic, describing it as “a weapon without bullets” that carries more psychological than practical weight.

Speaking to the Tasnim news agency, affiliated with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, Deligani argued that Britain, Germany, and France had already exhausted the tool in previous rounds of pressure, leaving it with “no new capacity to inflict damage” on Iran’s economy.

Under UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which enshrines the 2015 nuclear deal and expires in October, any signatory may reimpose sanctions. Neither China nor Russia would be able to block the step, which obliges all UN member states to enforce restrictions on uranium enrichment and ballistic missile development.

However, Deligani noted that many of these provisions had already been applied for years, and the snapback would not extend to Iranian oil or medicine exports.

China pushes back

Beijing, meanwhile, expressed firm opposition to the European move. Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian reiterated China’s preference for a political and diplomatic solution, rejecting the use of sanctions as leverage.

The statement came in response to an AFP inquiry following remarks by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said Tehran was working with both China and Russia to prevent the Europeans from restoring sanctions lifted under the 2015 accord.

European ultimatum

Earlier this week, the foreign ministers of Britain, France, and Germany sent a joint letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the Security Council, warning that they would invoke the snapback unless Iran complies with its nuclear commitments by the end of August.

They stressed their determination to use “all available diplomatic tools” to ensure Iran does not develop nuclear weapons.

In an interview with Iranian state television, Araghchi called the threat “negative” and vowed to resist. “If they proceed, we have tools to respond, and we will reveal them in due time,” he said.

While acknowledging that renewed sanctions could complicate matters, he downplayed fears of significant economic fallout.

Last month, he wrote to the UN arguing that the European trio lacked the legitimacy to trigger the mechanism, a claim the three foreign ministers firmly rejected in their latest letter.