Iran FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Do Not Intervene in Lebanon, Oppose Syria Split

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (Photo Credit: Ali Khamaj)
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (Photo Credit: Ali Khamaj)
TT

Iran FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Do Not Intervene in Lebanon, Oppose Syria Split

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (Photo Credit: Ali Khamaj)
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (Photo Credit: Ali Khamaj)

Iran is prepared to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States if Washington provides assurances against aggression, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said, warning that military strikes on Tehran’s nuclear facilities have failed to achieve their goals and will not succeed through talks either.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat in Jeddah, where he attended an extraordinary meeting of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) foreign ministers on Gaza, Araghchi did not rule out the possibility of renewed confrontation with Israel.

“Anything is possible, and Tehran is prepared for all scenarios,” he said.

Araghchi said ties with Saudi Arabia have entered an “unprecedented phase of cooperation,” describing the Kingdom as a “major regional and Islamic power” alongside Iran.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat on the sidelines of the Jeddah meeting, Araghchi stressed that Tehran does not interfere in Lebanon’s internal affairs but voices its opinions like others. He said Hezbollah’s arsenal is an issue for the group and the Lebanese government, adding that “plans to disarm Hezbollah are entirely Israeli.”

Asked about recent comments by Iran’s defense minister on building military infrastructure abroad, Araghchi declined to elaborate, saying, “Any clarification must come from the defense minister himself.”

On threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, the Iranian minister underlined that Tehran’s official policy is “absolutely clear” in seeking peace and stability in the vital Gulf waterway. “Iran is a producer and exporter of oil, and its economy depends heavily on it. That is why it wants free navigation for everyone,” he said.

Araghchi spoke extensively on a wide range of regional issues.

Gaza: Action Over Statements

Araghchi said people in Gaza need food, water and medicine rather than political declarations, urging Muslim countries to take practical steps in support of Palestinians.

Araghchi said the OIC meeting, which convened at the request of Iran, Palestine and Türkiye, produced “good statements and important decisions” but stressed that action on the ground was critical.

“I emphasized in my remarks that Islamic countries must take practical steps. Those that maintain ties with the Zionist entity should cut them and halt trade — that is a concrete move that can be made,” he said.

He added that Muslim states should unite in international forums and courts to condemn Israel. “It is only natural that more than 50 Islamic countries and over a billion Muslims, with their vast resources, can mobilize to support Gaza and Palestine,” Araghchi said.

Nuclear Talks with the US

Iran remains ready to enter “fair and balanced” negotiations over its nuclear program but will only engage in indirect talks with the United States if Washington guarantees it will not carry out military attacks during the process, Araghchi said.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that Tehran is already holding discussions with the three European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal, as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to set out a new framework for negotiations.

“We are prepared for indirect talks with the United States, provided they reassure us there will be no military aggression during the talks,” Araghchi said.

“If they come to the table for fair negotiations built on mutual interests, that serves both sides. But if they believe they can achieve through negotiations what they failed to achieve through military strikes, then such talks will not happen.”

He added that Iran has never walked away from talks. “We were at the heart of negotiations when Israel attacked us and the United States joined in. That is why any future negotiations will not be like those in the past,” Araghchi said, stressing that Tehran’s stance on indirect talks with Washington “has not changed.”

Prepared for Any Scenario with Israel

Iran is prepared for any confrontation with Israel, Araghchi affirmed, warning that the outcome of the last conflict showed the futility of military action against Iran.

“Anything is possible, and we are ready for all circumstances,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat when asked about rising tensions and the prospect of a new clash with Israel.

“During the 12-day war, the Zionist entity and the United States failed to achieve any of their objectives, while Iran resisted heroically and responded to the aggression. We continued our missile strikes on Israel until the last moment, while they thought they could stop them in 48 hours.”

Araghchi said Israel eventually sought an unconditional ceasefire. “Since their request came without conditions, we accepted it. If they want to repeat the scenario, we are ready. The 12-day war proved that the military option is not a successful one - it is a failed one. That is why I doubt they will try again. But if they do, they will face a similar, even stronger, response,” he said.

Saudi and Regional Relations

Recent conflicts in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, as well as attacks on Iran, have convinced the region that Israel is the main threat, Araghchi said, adding that Tehran has stepped up efforts to build trust with Arab neighbors.

“I believe everyone now realizes that the entity threatening the whole region and seeking to keep it weak and divided is the Zionist entity,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat. He said regional states, without exception, stood by Iran and condemned both Israel and the US in the wake of the latest assault.

Araghchi noted that since Iran’s new government took office last year, he has worked to accelerate rapprochement with neighbors. “I personally met Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman twice last year and also joined a meeting between him and Iran’s first vice president. Three meetings in one year are unprecedented in the history of relations between the two countries,” he said.

He added that Tehran had also revived contacts with other regional states, including Egypt and Jordan. “While diplomatic ties with Egypt are not yet at the highest level, I have had more phone calls and direct meetings with my Egyptian counterpart than with most other ministers in the region,” he said. Araghchi added that his talks showed regional governments now have greater confidence in Iran and share concerns about Israel’s threats.

Ties with Egypt

Araghchi said Tehran is in no hurry to formally raise its diplomatic relations with Cairo, though cooperation is ongoing and contacts are active.

“As with any two normal states, we have relations and cooperation, but formally upgrading diplomatic ties takes the right timing and we are not in a rush,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He noted that both countries maintain “Interests Sections” in each other’s capitals, staffed by envoys with ambassadorial rank. “Just last night I had dinner with the Egyptian foreign minister, and we spoke for more than two hours,” he added.

Addressing sometimes conflicting messages from Iran, such as threats by some figures to close the Strait of Hormuz versus official calls for Gulf stability, Araghchi said such remarks do not reflect government policy.

“These are not statements by officials of Iran but by ordinary individuals or journalists with no responsibility. Iranian society is open, and you can hear all kinds of views. If you watch Iranian television, you will see nightly debates between someone calling to close Hormuz and another rejecting it,” he said.

Araghchi stressed that Iran’s official position is “absolutely clear.”

“We call for peace and calm in the Gulf. Like Saudi Arabia and other regional states, Iran is a producer and exporter of oil, and our economy depends heavily on it. It is natural that we want peace in the Gulf, free navigation for everyone, and normal shipping,” he said.

Iran: Israel Sought to Ignite ‘Oil War’ in Gulf During 12-Day Conflict

Israel tried to drag the region into an “oil war” by targeting Iran’s energy facilities during the recent 12-day conflict, but Tehran responded by striking Israeli sites while working to prevent the fighting from spilling into the Gulf, Araghchi revealed.

“During the 12-day war, when Israel attacked our oil installations in Asaluyeh, we realized they wanted to pull the war into the Gulf and ignite an ‘oil war,’” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat. “We responded by hitting Israeli facilities and did our utmost to prevent the conflict from spreading to the Gulf.”

He said Gulf Arab states should focus on the risks posed by Israeli policies rather than Iran. “Their concern should be directed at Israel’s actions, which could lead to closing the Strait of Hormuz and dragging the war into the region - not at Iran,” Araghchi said.

Iranian Defense Minister’s Remarks

Araghchi declined to comment on recent statements by Iran’s defense minister about building military infrastructure abroad, saying any clarification should come from the defense minister himself.

When asked to explain the remarks, Araghchi smiled and said: “Do you really expect me to answer such a question?” He added: “If further clarification was necessary, it should have been provided by the defense minister.”

Iran Says it Does Not Intervene in Lebanon

Araghchi said Tehran does not interfere in Lebanon’s internal affairs but expresses its opinions like other states, stressing that any disarmament of Hezbollah is an entirely Israeli initiative.

“We do not intervene in Lebanon’s internal matters, but that does not prevent us from voicing our positions, just as all countries do,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Saudi Arabia, for example, expresses its views on Lebanon, which is not considered interference. True interference is occupying Lebanese territory or imposing strange plans to undermine Lebanon.”

Araghchi said Hezbollah itself and the Lebanese government are responsible for decisions regarding the group’s weapons. “Hezbollah has proposed a national dialogue to determine Lebanon’s security strategy with the participation of all components. We are confident of one truth: Israel wants all regional states weak, disarmed, scattered, and in conflict,” he said.

He cited Syria as an example, noting that Israel had seized more territory and destroyed military capabilities under the new government compared with Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

“This is the scenario Israel seeks to implement in Lebanon, and Hezbollah’s resistance thwarted it. While the resistance has suffered attacks and damage recently, they think it has weakened. That is why they want to disarm it. But disarming Hezbollah is 100% an Israeli plan. The decision belongs to Hezbollah, the Lebanese government, and the Lebanese themselves; we only express our opinion,” Araghchi said.

He added that other regional states should recognize this reality and not underestimate the risk of similar scenarios in their countries.

“Enemies tried to target Iran, but it resisted, and they regretted it. How did Iran resist? Not through diplomacy or talks with the US, but with its missiles. It is strength, not concession, that counters Israel. We advise regional states not to make concessions to Israel; the more they give, the more it expands and grows bold. Recent statements by Netanyahu confirm Israel’s ambitions across the region,” he said.

Iran Says Ready to Work with Saudi Arabia on Lebanon

Araghchi said Tehran is willing to cooperate with Riyadh on Lebanon, describing recent talks with his Saudi counterpart as constructive.

“I met with Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan in Jeddah, and we had a good discussion on Lebanon,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat. “Yes, there are differences in viewpoints, but we spoke calmly and in a positive atmosphere. We are ready to continue this dialogue with the Saudi side until we reach a point that can help ease this file.”

“I have no doubt that Saudi Arabia wants to help the Lebanese people, and so do we. The tools and methods may differ, but I have every hope that we can reach common ground,” he said.

Iran Backs Syrian Unity, Opposes Partition

Iran supports the territorial unity of Syria and opposes any attempts to partition the country, Araghchi said, condemning Israeli strikes on Syrian territory as the result of “excessive concessions” to Israel.

“Our position on Syria is very clear: we support Syria’s unity and the preservation of its sovereignty and borders, and we reject any attempts to divide it,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“We also want stability and calm in Syria. Experience shows that without stability, the country can become a haven for terrorist groups, which is against the interests of any regional state.”

Araghchi said Iran has had no contact so far with Syria’s new government. “We are not in a rush. Whenever the new government in Syria realizes that relations with Iran serve Syria’s interests - both the government’s and the people’s - we will consider it,” he added.

Iran Says Saudi Arabia a Major Regional Power, Stresses Cooperation for Stability

Araghchi described Saudi Arabia as a “major country in the region and the Islamic world,” saying stability and peace can only be achieved through cooperation between Tehran and Riyadh.

“Saudi Arabia and Iran are both key poles in the region. Yes, there are differences and competition, but they should not become hostility,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“The Saudi people are our religious brothers, and the Iranian people are your brothers and sisters. More than 80,000 Iranian pilgrims perform Hajj annually, and recently Umrah campaigns have started, with around 400,000 expected this year.”

He added that both countries share concerns for Islam, Muslim interests, and regional security.

“Cooperation serves bilateral relations, the region, and the Islamic world. Fortunately, new opportunities have opened in relations over recent years, especially last year. But economic ties have not yet been sufficiently developed, requiring more joint planning,” Araghchi said.

Highlighting people-to-people ties, he said: “We hope to see, in the near future, the same number of Saudi tourists visiting Iran as Iranians visiting Saudi Arabia. Iran’s nature, culture, history, and landmarks will offer them a rewarding experience and provide a firsthand view of Iran, away from the portrayal by Western media. A visitor’s first trip changes that perception entirely.”

Iran Hails ‘Strong, Excellent’ Saudi Stance During Recent Israel Tensions

Araghchi praised Saudi Arabia’s position during the recent confrontation between Iran and Israel, calling it “strong and excellent.”

“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia took a very strong and excellent stance, whether in condemning Israeli and US attacks against Iran or in supporting Iran and the Iranian people,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat. “The same position was adopted by the Gulf Cooperation Council, which we consider extremely valuable.”

Iran Sees Economic Opportunities for Saudi Investors, Highlights Trade Potential

Araghchi said boosting trade and investment with Saudi Arabia is a priority, noting that both countries could supply many of each other’s needs more efficiently.

“Many goods currently sourced from distant countries could come from Iran, which is nearby, and similarly, many of our needs can be met by Saudi Arabia,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat. “Trade between us and one regional country alone reaches around $30 billion, showing that even under sanctions, substantial exchange is possible.”

He highlighted opportunities for Saudi investors in Iran, particularly in oil, gas, and other industries. “Iran has about 100 million people, and its geographic location makes it a key corridor to Central Asia, the Caucasus, and Europe via the Indian Ocean and the Chabahar port,” Araghchi said.

Iranian FM Expresses Optimism About Regional Cooperation

Araghchi expressed cautious optimism about the future of the region, saying diplomacy remains hopeful even amid tensions.

“Diplomats are always optimistic,” Araghchi told Asharq Al-Awsat. “I believe that if cooperation is achieved among regional countries, especially between Iran and Saudi Arabia, we will see a region marked by stability and calm, flourishing with progress and development. I am doing everything I can to guide Iranian diplomacy toward this goal.”



Al-Khanbashi to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Warn Against Incitement, Hadramout Has Room for All

Governor of Hadramout, Salim Al-Khanbashi delivers a press conference in the city of Mukalla in Yemen's coastal southern Hadramout province on January 19, 2026. (Photo by FADEL SENNA / AFP)
Governor of Hadramout, Salim Al-Khanbashi delivers a press conference in the city of Mukalla in Yemen's coastal southern Hadramout province on January 19, 2026. (Photo by FADEL SENNA / AFP)
TT

Al-Khanbashi to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Warn Against Incitement, Hadramout Has Room for All

Governor of Hadramout, Salim Al-Khanbashi delivers a press conference in the city of Mukalla in Yemen's coastal southern Hadramout province on January 19, 2026. (Photo by FADEL SENNA / AFP)
Governor of Hadramout, Salim Al-Khanbashi delivers a press conference in the city of Mukalla in Yemen's coastal southern Hadramout province on January 19, 2026. (Photo by FADEL SENNA / AFP)

Presidential Leadership Council (PLC) member and Governor of Yemen's eastern Hadramout province Salem al-Khanbashi says he believes that “Hadramout triumphed for itself,” and that what took place there in December 2025 and early January 2026 marked a decisive moment in which Hadhramis reclaimed their right to protect their identity and blocked any political project seeking to dissolve the “Hadhrami self” under the slogans of outsiders.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat Podcast, recorded in Riyadh on February 9, 2026, al-Khanbashi advised the new Yemeni government led by Dr. Shayea al-Zindani to steer clear of partisanship, raise performance levels, and combat corruption. During the discussion, he presented his account of events, framing the operation as a “takeover of military camps,” not the “ignition of a war.” He broadened the discussion to what he views as the priority of the current phase: consolidating stability, activating development, and opening the door to long-awaited Hadhrami investments returning home.

“Liberate us" from ourselves?

In describing the outcome of the confrontation, the deputy rejects reducing the picture to who won and who lost. He says the real victory was achieved when the people of Hadramout rejected the notion that someone could arrive and say, “We came to liberate you,” asking: “Liberate you from whom? From ourselves?” He stresses that the governorate, with its history stretching back “thousands of years,” cannot have another identity imposed upon it. He records his appreciation for those who stood in defense of this distinctiveness, while at the same time extending explicit thanks to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, its leadership and role, which he said was a key player in containing last month’s events.

On the moment he was tasked with the governorship at an extremely sensitive time, al-Khanbashi recounts that he was residing in Hadramout and did not leave except when necessary, before receiving a call from President Rashad al-Alimi and from parties including Saudi officials and colleagues on the Leadership Council, asking him to assume responsibility for the governorate “because we need you.”He says he tried to decline, but accepted under the pressure of “necessity,” emphasizing that he is a son of Hadramout who spent most of his life there, and that he accepted the post fully aware of the weight and complexity of the phase.

The picture becomes heavier as al-Khanbashi moves to his successive roles: governor, then commander of the National Shield Forces in Hadramout , then a member of the Leadership Council with the rank of vice president. He deliberately labels the January operation a “battle to take over the camps,” so that it would not be understood as targeting civilian society or as a search for settling scores.

Al-Khanbashi says his overriding concern was to spare Hadramout street fighting, protect civilian infrastructure, and minimize human losses. He describes the operation as “swift and decisive,” with a limited number of casualties.

Securing withdrawals... and a political outlet

Asked whether the military operation in Hadramout ended with reprisals against opponents, al-Khanbashi is keen to deny this. He says the withdrawal of departing forces was secured and that they were not subjected to any military or popular harassment. “We instructed that no one who was in the Southern Transitional Council, whether military or civilian, be harmed,” he says. At the same time, he explains that he took decisions to dismiss certain security and military leaders accused of involvement in looting weapons and ammunition or of poor performance, and that they will be referred for accountability in accordance with what they committed against the governorate.

Amid this, al-Khanbashi reiterates a message he wants widely understood: “Hadramout has room for all.” He calls for civic conduct that avoids incitement, and warns against marches he believes target civil peace and provoke the local scene.

He again urges adherence to civil behavior without incitement, citing gatherings that took place in early February 2026 in Seiyun. He suggests they were not spontaneous, saying: “We have evidence that these people were paid, and we want them not to force us to take measures involving a degree of coercive force against those who want to practice such acts. We are still under a state of emergency, and all measures can be taken.”

In the broader political context, al-Khanbashi speaks of moves to convene a broad Hadhrami meeting in Saudi Arabia bringing together political and social components, including Hadhramis from the Southern Transitional Council, with the aim of preparing a unified vision in the name of Hadramout to be presented to the Southern Dialogue Conference. He notes that a preparatory committee was formed in Mukalla to draft a position reflecting “all societal and political forces” in the governorate, alongside a parallel desire to represent the voice of Hadhrami expatriates within a single vision.

Electricity and investment

Electricity tops the services file, according to the governor. He places it at the head of priorities, explaining that the needs of the coast and the valley differ, but the headline is the same: energy that does not meet demand, especially in summer, with humidity and heat on the coast and harsh desert conditions in the valley.

He speaks of support projects to generate 300 megawatts for the coast, and other projects for the valley, alongside proposals for gas-powered plants and private-sector solar energy options with capacities that could reach 150 megawatts. He believes that a medium-term solution is not a substitute for a long-term strategic project for a large gas plant capable of covering Hadramout's future needs.

From energy he turns to investment as the other face of stability. Al-Khanbashi lists opportunities he sees as promising: tourism, real estate, the export of high-purity gypsum, potential minerals, coal in specific areas, black sands and heavy elements, fisheries, and the idea of aquaculture. He recalls his participation in a Hadhrami investment conference, calling on businessmen to balance their external investments with investing in Hadramout, while pledging to provide facilitation and an attractive environment.

On government affairs, al-Khanbashi describes the discussions that preceded the formation of the new government as having focused on criteria of competence, experience, and geographic balance, while rejecting the principle of quota-sharing. He then offers three pieces of advice he places at the core of the government’s test: moving away from ego and partisan drift, combating entrenched corruption in several ministries, and raising the level of revenue collection and transferring it to the central bank, especially in revenue-generating ministries. He highlights the need to regulate the financial relationship between the center and the governorates in accordance with the Local Authority Law, arguing that strict application would ease many chronic problems.

He recalls Hadramout's experience with oil revenues before exports were halted, noting that the governorate received 20 percent of the value of exported oil and used it for development projects such as electricity, roads, health, and education, before this resource stopped after the Houthis targeted export facilities.

"No barriers" with Saudi Arabia

In assessing Saudi development support, al-Khanbashi links relief and reconstruction as a single window for enabling Yemen to overcome its crisis, pointing to packages of projects in electricity, roads, health services, and others within Hadramout.

He places this within a relationship he describes as intertwined, difficult to separate socially, economically, and politically, invoking the extended borders, shared tribes, and cultural ties, to conclude that it is not possible to erect a “barrier” between Hadramout and the Kingdom.

Asked about the moment that remained most vivid in his memory during the 48 hours of the operation, al-Khanbashi says he feared the forces might not withdraw easily and what that could entail in terms of destruction and casualties, before the operation ended in record time with limited losses. He says this is what he will continue to take pride in: that Hadramout succeeded in avoiding internal fighting. In his message to the people of Hadramout, he calls for unity, abandoning the causes of division, and prioritizing security and development, pledging that the expansion of stability will lead to a “bright development era” reflected in the lives of the governorate’s residents.


Iraqi Justice Minister to Asharq Al-Awsat: ISIS Prisoners Held at a Fortified Site, Escape Impossible

Iraqi Justice Minister Khaled Shwani
Iraqi Justice Minister Khaled Shwani
TT

Iraqi Justice Minister to Asharq Al-Awsat: ISIS Prisoners Held at a Fortified Site, Escape Impossible

Iraqi Justice Minister Khaled Shwani
Iraqi Justice Minister Khaled Shwani

Iraqi Justice Minister Khaled Shwani told Asharq Al-Awsat that Iraq will not repatriate foreign prisoners affiliated with ISIS to their home countries if their involvement in crimes against Iraqi citizens is proven. He said a heavily fortified Iraqi prison currently holds thousands of ISIS members transferred from Syria, stressing that security breaches, escapes, smuggling, or internal unrest are not possible, despite what he described as enormous pressure on judicial institutions and the presence among the detainees of some of the world’s most dangerous terrorists.

Iraq agreed to receive thousands of prisoners suspected of affiliation with ISIS starting January 21. Although the international coalition transferred them in batches from prisons previously overseen by the Syrian Democratic Forces following military operations by the Syrian army in northeastern Syria, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani confirmed that “the decision to receive the prisoners was purely an Iraqi one.”

Since then, Shwani says he has been “working intensively with judicial, government, and security officials” to manage a highly sensitive and dangerous operation aimed at accommodating a large number of prisoners in a way that prevents them from becoming a “ticking time bomb,” and at returning most of them to their countries so that their detention does not turn into a new school for producing extremism.

The Minister was born in the city of Kirkuk, north of Baghdad, in 1975. He has served as Iraq’s justice minister since 2022. He is a lawyer and constitutional expert, and a member of the political bureau of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, led by Pavel Talabani.

Iraqi Justice Minister Khaled Shwani

In an exclusive interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, the Iraqi Minister said that taking custody of ISIS prisoners in such large numbers came after major efforts to ease prison overcrowding, but that Iraqi authorities bore the burden in order to safeguard regional security.

According to Shwani, the Justice Ministry has long experience in managing terrorist inmates and confronting extremism. It relies on a program known as the “Moderation Program,” which aims to strip inmates of extremist ideology through multiple means, including vocational training. For this reason, he said, the international community trusts Iraq to house the most dangerous terrorists in its prisons. The following is the full text of the interview:

When the decision was announced to transfer prisoners from Syria to Iraq, was the Justice Ministry ready to receive this number of inmates?

After the Iraqi government agreed to receive the prisoners, the National Security Council of Ministers convened, and preparations began to take custody of them. Certainly, receiving such a large number is neither easy nor simple. It requires large prison facilities, equipment, and security protection, in addition to everything inmates need in correctional institutions, whether for the prisoners themselves or the security requirements to protect the prisons.

Our prisons were already overcrowded. But because we believe in the importance of this issue, and because it is related to protecting regional security from prisoners of an extremely dangerous level, urgent measures had to be taken to prepare prison sections to receive and house them. With the support provided by Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani, and the relevant bodies in government and the judiciary, we were able to succeed. All prisoners received were placed in jail, and we have now provided all prison-related requirements, as well as the security requirements to protect it.

What do you mean by those requirements?

The detainees are now housed in standard prisons with air conditioning, bathrooms, and cleaning supplies. They receive three meals a day and are guarded by a professional staff of guards and investigators. I can say that the judicial institution is dealing with them professionally, likely different from the situation in Syria. Their conditions are now better than they were before their transfer to Iraq.

An ISIS member at Al-Karkh Prison in Baghdad (AP)

Has overcrowding increased after the addition of these prisoners? How are they distributed?

Because of the exceptional circumstances Iraq went through, including the occupation of areas by ISIS, earlier bombings by Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups, as well as organized crime, the prison overcrowding rate when I took office three years ago stood at 300 percent. We put in place a systematic plan and managed to reduce overcrowding to 25 percent above normal capacity.

However, receiving 5,704 prisoners at once caused overcrowding again, because accommodating nearly 6,000 inmates required placing additional strain on other prisons, undermining efforts to ease overcrowding.

Where were they housed?

They were placed in a single prison. The operation is complex because their classification requires housing them in a prison that is tightly secured, fortified, and protected- security-wise, militarily, and intelligence-wise.

How were they housed while in pretrial detention, given that the Justice Ministry deals only with convicted prisoners?

Under Iraqi law, when a detainee is dangerous, a judge has the authority to place him in a secure location from which escape is impossible or feared, and where his protection can be guaranteed. This is not an exceptional case; it is purely legal. They are detainees under judicial decisions, and because of the danger they pose, they were placed in this prison, where they are held away from other prisoners.

How do you bear the burden? How is such a large number of prisoners managed?

There is a heavy burden on us at all levels. We need human resources to run this prison, infrastructure, additional manpower, military and security forces for protection, as well as the costs of housing, maintenance, and providing services to 5,704 prisoners. This is not easy. We face challenges, especially financial ones. But there is communication with the international coalition to bear the costs, and they have expressed readiness in this regard.

How is this matter funded?

There is understanding and communication with the international coalition, which has expressed readiness to bear financial burdens related to housing those prisoners, providing infrastructure and prison supplies, and some security requirements. We prepared a comprehensive project and sent it to the coalition, and we are awaiting their response and procedures.

How many investigators handle the prisoners’ cases?

About 150 investigators are working through the files of thousands of prisoners. They are carrying out enormous work, assisted by a large number of employees and specialized experts.

How are they classified?

We have among them the most dangerous terrorists. They are classified according to security criteria and internationally approved standards for dealing with prisoners. Highly dangerous inmates and those with terrorist ideology do not mix with ordinary prisoners. Our prisons are classified by type of crime, the severity of the offense, and age groups.

How likely is a breach or internal mutiny?

This prison is fortified and cannot be breached. I will not disclose further details, but the site is protected and cannot be penetrated. Nor can we speak of internal mutiny, because the security agencies supporting the Justice Ministry have taken their precautions with full professionalism. This cannot happen.

How are prisoners’ affairs managed inside the prison, and what measures are taken to prevent some from becoming potential hubs for terrorist activity?

First, we are in contact with their countries to repatriate them according to their nationalities once investigations are completed, provided they are not among those who fought Iraq, killed Iraqis, or participated in terrorist activities inside Iraq. Those exceptions will not be returned even if requested. We are working to repatriate the remaining detainees, and the international coalition is working with us to expedite the process.

As for their management, the Justice Ministry has long experience in this field. Other prisons of the same security classification hold dangerous terrorists, including ISIS leaders captured during operations to liberate Iraqi territory from the group. They have been placed in rehabilitation and reform programs.

This includes the “Moderation Program,” which aims to remove extremist ideology through intellectual, cultural, social, sports, and artistic approaches, in addition to vocational training. The program has achieved significant results. We seek to ensure their stay is temporary pending deportation, and during their time in custody we apply established programs and expertise in dealing with high-risk terrorist inmates.

What if efforts to return them fail? What would the situation be if they remain in Iraqi prisons for a long period?

What has been agreed with countries and with the international coalition is to return them as quickly as possible. There is clear coordination on this matter, with the exception of those who fought Iraqi security forces or committed crimes against Iraqis, as I said earlier. Those will be tried and will remain in Iraq.

ISIS members as they are placed in custody at Al-Karkh Central Prison in Baghdad (AP)

Are there countries that refuse to take back their nationals?

The matter is still in its early stages, as are the attempts. The international coalition and the United States are working with us to urge countries that have prisoners to receive them, and we will continue these efforts.

Why did the international coalition transfer ISIS prisoners to Iraq?

There may be a political aspect unrelated to the Justice Ministry, but I will highlight clear points: there is trust in the Iraqi defense and security system, trust that Iraq is a partner and an influential state within the international coalition to combat ISIS, and a reliable system to house these prisoners.


Ukrainian Official to Asharq Al-Awsat: Russia’s Demands to Annex Territory are a Red Line

Ukrainian soldiers at an undisclosed location in Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia region on January 30, 2026 (AFP)
Ukrainian soldiers at an undisclosed location in Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia region on January 30, 2026 (AFP)
TT

Ukrainian Official to Asharq Al-Awsat: Russia’s Demands to Annex Territory are a Red Line

Ukrainian soldiers at an undisclosed location in Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia region on January 30, 2026 (AFP)
Ukrainian soldiers at an undisclosed location in Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia region on January 30, 2026 (AFP)

A senior Ukrainian official said Kyiv is concentrating its negotiating efforts with Russia on achieving an unconditional ceasefire, while stressing the need for full international security guarantees to ensure that any future attack on Ukraine does not recur. He underscored that Russia’s demands to annex Ukrainian territory represent a red line.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Ukraine’s ambassador to Saudi Arabia Anatolii Petrenko reaffirmed his country’s commitment to peace, saying: “We take every opportunity to engage in diplomatic negotiations with Russia to deescalate the ongoing military standoff as a key prerequisite for inclusive political solution in order to achieve just and lasting peace.”

He added that “real breakthrough in current negotiations would be to achieve the unconditional ceasefire.” He also stressed the urgency of making progress on the return of abducted Ukrainian children and prisoners of war, noting that “If promptly agreed these would pave the way for much broader and deeper dialogue between Ukraine and Russia potentially leading to a comprehensive political decision.”

Anatolii Petrenko, Ukraine’s ambassador to Saudi Arabia (Embassy of Ukraine in Riyadh)

Petrenko said that, in this complex process, Ukraine is supported by its international partners who stand firmly on the principles of international law, Ukraine’s sovereignty, and its territorial integrity. He said: “We are convinced that unconditional ceasefire would be top testament of Russia’s genuine readiness for lasting peace.”

At the same time, he expressed regret that “daily realities of Russian strikes against Ukraine’s critical energy infrastructure against the backdrop of ongoing diplomatic efforts reflect fundamental gap we are to bridge using every compelling leverage in possession of international community.”

Petrenko went on to stress that “the issue of Russia’s demands for territorial annexation are illegitimate and represent our red line in accordance with Ukraine’s Constitution.” He added that “It cannot be considered as a matter of a technical compromise for the sake of ongoing negotiations with Russia,” noting that “Ukraine’s delegation has a clear mandate to pursue further diplomatic negotiations strictly based on our national interests.”

The American Role

Petrenko described the US role in any political settlement as central, saying: “The United States’ role remains central. This is our strategic partner, and we rely on our partnership to achieve a strategic solution for Ukraine’s sovereignty.”

He said this partnership includes “steadfast support to ongoing diplomatic negotiations with Russia, vital commitment to sustained combat readiness of our defense forces with tangible security guarantees and clear common vision for economic recovery of Ukraine once the war is terminated.”

Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy during at the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 22 (Reuters)

Petrenko stressed that “United States’ leadership in maintaining world security should deliver an effective political solution to stop war against Ukraine thus undoubtedly generating global stability much needed across all continents and regions.”

On another front, he said Ukraine aspires to join the European Union in the foreseeable future, saying: “Ukraine has always been a part of Europe.” He added: “Our national ambition is to become a new member of the European Union in foreseeable future.”

He said “the European Union is our strongest partner to maintain macro-economic stability, develop Ukraine’s defense industry and contribute to future security guarantees,” noting that “our joint approach to ending the war has always been unified – politically, economically and militarily.”

Petrenko added that “European Union has to be part of diplomatic negotiations for peace as we all understand the European security remains undivided and Ukraine is the cornerstone of that security.”

Russia’s Exhaustion

Petrenko spoke about Russian losses since the war began on 24 February 2022, saying: “Since 24 February 2022, Russia has lost around 1.3 mln personnel, with 11,654 tanks, 24,013 armored vehicles, 435 aircraft and 28 warships destroyed.” He said “These figures illustrate not only a tragic human toll but also a profound degradation of Russia’s warfighting capacity.”

On the economic front, he noted: “Russia’s wartime economy shows clear signs of running aground,” stressing that “GDP growth has slowed to near stagnation at around 1% in 2025 and projected to remain minimal in 2026 due to sanctions, declining oil and gas revenues and rising structural imbalances.” He added: “Annual inflation reached around 7% with key interest rate at 16%, the budget is expected to run a noticeable deficit.”

Petrenko said: “War brings no prosperity to any nation in the world.” He added that “Russia should take this very seriously and reverse the aggression into civilized neighborly relationship with Ukraine as a responsible member of the United Nations and its Security Council.”

Saudi–Ukrainian Partnership

On relations with Saudi Arabia, Petrenko said: “Ukraine and Saudi Arabia experience a dynamic phase of consistent political and economic engagement.”

He said: “Last year President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy paid an official visit to Saudi Arabia which resulted in the adoption of a Joint Statement showcasing the strong political will of the leaders to deepen and expand cooperation in the prospective fields.”

Volodymyr Zelenskyy holding talks with Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman in Jeddah on March 10, 2025 (EPA)

Petrenko reaffirmed the two countries’ determination to strengthen investment relations through partnerships in priority sectors, including energy, food industries, and infrastructure, with a shared desire to continue exploring opportunities for cooperation in oil, gas, their derivatives, and petrochemicals.

He added: “Particular value is attached to the Kingdom’s practical efforts to provide a conducive environment for diplomatic engagement within the Ukraine–US–Russia triangle last year, underscoring the Saudi Monarchy’s sincere commitment to contribute to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine in a meaningful and practical way.”

Petrenko expressed his country’s deep gratitude for the humanitarian and energy assistance provided by Saudi Arabia.