‘Cable Car’ Sees Boom in South America to Overcome Traffic Congestion

A view of cable cars over a neighborhood in Ecatepec, Mexico, on Aug. 25, 2016. (Mario Vazquez/AFP/Getty Images)
A view of cable cars over a neighborhood in Ecatepec, Mexico, on Aug. 25, 2016. (Mario Vazquez/AFP/Getty Images)
TT

‘Cable Car’ Sees Boom in South America to Overcome Traffic Congestion

A view of cable cars over a neighborhood in Ecatepec, Mexico, on Aug. 25, 2016. (Mario Vazquez/AFP/Getty Images)
A view of cable cars over a neighborhood in Ecatepec, Mexico, on Aug. 25, 2016. (Mario Vazquez/AFP/Getty Images)

The cable-car soars above Ecatepec, a poor suburb of Mexico City.

The first urban "cable car" system (Mexicable) has transported 1.6 million passengers from the suburb since October 2016 along a five-kilometer road including seven stations.

The entire journey takes only 17 minutes, which is less than half the time spent by a commuter using a public bus or a taxi. The ticket price is 7 pesos (37 cents).

Nancy Romero is so happy. Romero, a Mexicable passenger said: "I can go to work now more quickly and comfortably. Public buses are always stacked with passengers.”

While cable cars are often seen as high-altitude touristic features, or as a ski transport mean in advanced industrial countries, they have become a mass transit vehicle in Latin America.

"Latin America is now a popular area for cable cars in cities," said an official from Doppelmayr Company, the world's largest cable engineering market.

The German news agency noted that the mountainous nature of the Latin American cities makes cable cars a preferred means of transportation in these cities, which suffer from heavy traffic congestion, and the lack of subway lines.

Almost every city in South America with a population of 200,000 or 300,000 people has already asked us for information about cable cars, added the official whose company has set up lines for cable cars in Venezuela, Bolivia, Colombia and Mexico.

Mexicable lines cost over 1.7 billion pesos ($89 million), and were mainly built by the Italian firm LEITNER.

Among the advantages of the Mexicable system is that it is expected to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the Mexican capital by 10,000 tons a year. Officials also hope it will reduce crime rates targeting public bus passengers.

Officials also believe that "cable cars" will contribute to improving security by facilitating the transfer of citizens to the center of Mexico City, where they can get regular jobs instead of getting involved in criminal acts with gangs; the additional street lights deployed near cable car stations may also help making side streets safer.

For instance, crime rates in Medellin, a Colombian city that was the first in Latin America to implement the "cable car" project in 2004, has declined, although improved security could also be due to increased police presence.

The largest cable car network in Latin America is currently located in the Bolivian capital La Paz, with vehicles carrying up to 125,000 passengers a day.

The Teleferico cable cars network in Bolivia, which is used by nearly 100 million people, was launched in May 2014. Bolivian President Evo Morales opened the fifth line of the planned 10-line network in September.

Sources from the LEITNER Company explain that "cable cars do not need large spaces, and can pass in the air over any obstacle, saving time.”

This Italian company, which led the construction of Mexicable, also built a 3.5 km line in Rio de Janeiro, connecting the Complexo de Ilmão area with a metro station.

This line can carry up to 3,000 passengers per hour, despite that its work was suspended due to financial problems.

Although public transport systems are usually supported by the state, cable cars have become increasingly popular, and experts believe that they can one day recover their operating costs.

The idea worked so well in South America, and has moved to Africa, where it is now being planned for African cities such as Lagos in Nigeria, and Mombasa, Kenya, according to sources in the cable cars sector.



Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
TT

Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)

It is difficult to predict what the outcomes will be of the discussions between Iran, France, Britain and Germany about Tehran’s nuclear program in Geneva on Friday.

Last week, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution again ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a "comprehensive" report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.

Britain, France, Germany and the United States, which proposed the resolution, dismissed as insufficient and insincere a last-minute Iranian move to cap its stock of uranium that is close to weapons-grade. Diplomats said Iran's move was conditional on scrapping the resolution.

Iran has been weighing its response to the censure, debating whether to increase uranium enrichment or by being open to the proposals expected at the Geneva talks.

The discussions may seek a new nuclear deal instead of the 2015 one with Tehran that is in tatters.

As it stands, Iran is likely to opt for negotiations instead of escalation due to a number of internal, regional and international reasons.

Diplomatic sources in Paris noted US President-elect Donald Trump’s appointments of officials handling Middle East affairs, underscoring their unreserved support to Israel and clear hostility to Iran.

These appointments may lead Iran to think twice before resorting to any escalation.

Even before Trump has taken office, his circles have said that the new president will take “several executive decisions related to Iran and that will be declared on his first day in office.” The decisions will be binding and do not need Congress’ approval.

However, Trump is unpredictable and the sources did not rule out the surprise possibility of him striking a deal with Iran related to its nuclear program and behavior in the Middle East. This means that Tehran will have to make major concessions, including abandoning its policy of “exporting the revolution”.

This remains a far-fatched possibility, however. In all likelihood, Washington under Trump will return to his “maximum pressure” policy against Iran on political, diplomatic and economic levels to make it return to the negotiations table and agree on a deal that completely ends its nuclear ambitions.

So, at the Geneva meeting on Friday, Tehran will seek to achieve two main goals: a nuclear breakthrough during what remains of US President Joe Biden’s time in office, and attempt to lure the European powers away from Trump.

The truth is that Tehran is wading in the unknown. One only has to go back to Trump’s past statements about how Israel should have struck Iran’s nuclear facilities during its October 26 attack on the country.

Trump has already shown Iran his hardline stance when he ordered the assassination of Quds Forces leader Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad airport in January 2020.

Based on this, Tehran is scrambling to avert a joint American-Israeli strike that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been dreaming of.

Iran is vulnerable now due to two main reasons: the Israeli strike in October weakened Iran’s air defenses and Netanyahu has said that Israeli jets can now run rampant over Iran without any worries.

And Tehran can no longer rely on its allied militias to threaten Israel with all-out war. Hamas in Gaza is no longer in a position to threaten Israel and neither is Hezbollah in Lebanon.

So, Iran now finds itself exposed and would rather turn to negotiations with Europe than risk escalation that would cost it dearly with Israel now that it can no longer rely on Hamas and Hezbollah.