Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Cairo: We Still Believe In Renaissance Dam Negotiations

Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Egypt Markos Tekle (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Egypt Markos Tekle (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Cairo: We Still Believe In Renaissance Dam Negotiations

Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Egypt Markos Tekle (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Egypt Markos Tekle (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Ethiopia’s newly appointed Ambassador to Egypt Markos Tekle said it was too early to talk about the failure of the Renaissance Dam negotiations with Egypt.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, the ambassador noted that his country still insists on the talks to resolve the disputes over the dam

“We still believe in the negotiation, and we adhere to our consistent position in this regard,” he said, adding that Ethiopia insisted to move on with the talks without a direct mediator.

“We assume that the African Union will continue to manage the negotiation sessions. But we prefer that the AU only manage the sessions, without assuming a mediating role,” he underlined.

Ethiopia estimates the cost of building the Renaissance Dam at about $4 billion and hopes to become the largest African exporter of electricity and meet the needs of 70 million of its citizens.

Egypt, for its part, warns that the filling of the dam would affect its annual share of 55.5 billion cubic meters, on which it relies to meet 90 percent of its water needs. Cairo has called for a “binding legal agreement regarding the rules of filling and operating the dam.

On his country’s insistence not to have any direct mediator in the talks, Tekle said: “Our position here is quite clear. We did not ask for the help of any mediator, and we still adhere to this position to this day. We believe that Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan can discuss the relevant issues and settle their differences.”

On whether there was a contradiction between his assertion that Ethiopia “negotiates in good faith” and the country’s announcement to start filling the dam before reaching an agreement with Egypt and Sudan, Tekle replied: “Yes, we have embarked on that, but we still hope to reach an agreement through negotiations.”

He explained: “Due to the outbreak of the coronavirus… and other developments, the negotiations did not proceed at the pace we had hoped for. Last summer, the rainy season was very abundant and the first phase of building the dam was completed, and therefore we did not find anything wrong with filling the dam.”

The Ethiopian ambassador admitted the presence of historical competition between his country and Egypt over the Nile Water, but he said: “We focus today on cooperation between the two countries, which together have many resources and areas of production.”



Mashhadani to Asharq Al-Awsat: Regional Coordination Needed to Prevent Syria’s Division

Mashhadani during a parliamentary session (Iraqi Parliament website)
Mashhadani during a parliamentary session (Iraqi Parliament website)
TT

Mashhadani to Asharq Al-Awsat: Regional Coordination Needed to Prevent Syria’s Division

Mashhadani during a parliamentary session (Iraqi Parliament website)
Mashhadani during a parliamentary session (Iraqi Parliament website)

Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani has called for high-level coordination among key regional players—including Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and other nations—to avert one of the most dangerous scenarios facing Syria: the threat of division, which he described as “one of Israel’s objectives.”

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Mashhadani discussed the Syrian crisis and its impact on Iraq and the broader region. He explained that the current Syrian situation has unfolded with unforeseen tools, timing, and external support, yet remains controlled and deliberate.

According to the Iraqi official, Syria faces three possible outcomes: stability, chaos, or division.

“Who supports the division of Syria?” he asked, saying “Israel alone, while key nations in the region—such as Iran, Türkiye, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Jordan—oppose it.”

He urged these nations to overcome their differences and coordinate to prevent Syria’s fragmentation and maintain its stability, saying: “We must prioritize the unity of Syria over our disputes.”

Mashhadani emphasized Iraq’s efforts to mediate and foster understanding among these countries, saying “Iraq has a unique historical opportunity to reclaim its regional role.”

He explained that Iraq’s strategic position as a crossroads between major nations enables it to facilitate dialogue and cooperation. He also stressed the importance of high-level security coordination, citing shared concerns over threats such as the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and ISIS.

“We all share common fears regarding the spread of extremist groups,” he said, “and Iraq can act as a coordinator to address these concerns.”

Additionally, he called for Iraq to collaborate with Gulf countries to address legitimate fears regarding Syria’s future governance and potential domination by extremist groups.

“We must ask: who will govern Syria, and how do we prevent the rise of radical forces like the Muslim Brotherhood?”

Mashhadani highlighted the unified rejection by Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia of plans to forcibly relocate Palestinians from the West Bank to Sinai, Jordan, or Iraq.

“This displacement scheme is unacceptable to us and to the region,” he affirmed.

On Iraq, Mashhadani confirmed that the parliamentary elections are set to take place in October, in line with agreements among political blocs. He also emphasized the need for national unity, saying: “Iraq needs a leadership umbrella that represents the entire nation, and parliament is best suited to fulfill this role.”

He further stated that his political agenda centers on rebuilding and uniting Iraq’s Sunni community, which has faced significant challenges since 2014.

“My mission is to bring together the different Sunni factions, despite their rivalries and conflicting interests,” he said. “I aim to serve as an umbrella figure—a stabilizing presence to guide them toward cohesion and cooperation.”

Revisiting his 2014 proposal for “national reconciliation,” Mashhadani stressed the importance of transitioning Iraq from a system based on sectarian divisions to one grounded in citizenship, where merit and competence prevail.

“We asked ourselves: what kind of Iraq do we want?” he recalled. “The answer was clear—an Iraq that transitions from a state of components to a state of citizenship.” However, the initiative was sidelined due to political events, including the 2018 protests. “The need for reconciliation is more urgent than ever,” he concluded.

Mashhadani dismissed recurring calls for the creation of a Sunni federal region as “political immaturity.” Reflecting on a similar proposal for a nine-province Shiite federal region in 2006, he reiterated his opposition to dividing Iraq.

He distinguished between federalism and division, saying: “Federalism is a promising concept, but it requires deep understanding and experience. Division, on the other hand, would be disastrous.”

“Iraq’s diversity makes unity our only viable path forward. Citizenship must be the foundation of our state," he added.