عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
World

Photo Recalling 'Occupation' of Iran Sparks Major Criticism in Tehran Against Moscow

The photo showed the Russian envoy, Levan Dzhagaryan, and Britain’s ambassador, Simon Shercliff, sitting where US president Franklin D. Roosevelt, British prime minister Winston Churchill and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin sat together at the Russian embassy during the 1943 strategy meeting - Getty Images
The photo showed the Russian envoy, Levan Dzhagaryan, and Britain’s ambassador, Simon Shercliff, sitting where US president Franklin D. Roosevelt, British prime minister Winston Churchill and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin sat together at the Russian embassy during the 1943 strategy meeting - Getty Images
TT
TT

Photo Recalling 'Occupation' of Iran Sparks Major Criticism in Tehran Against Moscow

The photo showed the Russian envoy, Levan Dzhagaryan, and Britain’s ambassador, Simon Shercliff, sitting where US president Franklin D. Roosevelt, British prime minister Winston Churchill and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin sat together at the Russian embassy during the 1943 strategy meeting - Getty Images
The photo showed the Russian envoy, Levan Dzhagaryan, and Britain’s ambassador, Simon Shercliff, sitting where US president Franklin D. Roosevelt, British prime minister Winston Churchill and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin sat together at the Russian embassy during the 1943 strategy meeting - Getty Images

A few hours after Iran announced forming its new government, a diplomatic row erupted in Tehran over a photograph published by the Russian embassy showing the UK and Russian ambassadors recalling the 1943 Tehran Conference, when the Allied powers occupied the country during World War II.

Russian ambassador Levan Dzhagaryan and his British counterpart Simon Shercliff were pictured on the same steps allied leaders met during World War II when Iran was invaded.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry summoned Dzhagaryan and Shercliff over the photo. Meanwhile, outgoing Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif led a chorus of criticism, calling the picture “extremely inappropriate”.

Amir Abdollahian, Iranian politician and Foreign Minister-designate, also slammed the photo that had sparked major internal conflict over Iran opening up to the West instead of turning to the east.

Abdollahian said the photo was “undiplomatic” and an insult to “the national pride of the Iranian people.”

The Russian embassy had posted the controversial photo on its official Twitter account.

More so, the picture shows the Russian envoy and Britain’s ambassador sitting where British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin sat together at the Russian Embassy during the 1943 meeting. US President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s chair in the middle was empty.

In a statement, the Iranian Foreign Ministry said that a high-ranking official told the two ambassadors that publishing the photo “hurt Iranians’ feelings and national pride.”

Iran’s state-run TV showed scenes from the historic meeting, emphasizing that it took place secretly and without the knowledge of the country’s ruler at the time.

In World War II, Iran was considered pro-Germany, although it had declared itself neutral. While the photo sparked a storm of criticism, Iranian media were busy evaluating the cabinet line-up revealed by the new president, Ebrahim Raisi.

According to Reuters, many are saying on Twitter that the aim of the photo appeared is to remind them of a time when their country was under foreign occupation. Others have noted that the picture represents the “first diplomatic test” or “first challenge” to face Raisi’s new government.

Most Viewed

 
 
World

Thailand Launches Airstrikes Along Border with Cambodia as Tensions Reignite 

Thai residents who fled homes following clashes between Thai and Cambodian soldiers rest at an evacuation center in Buriram province, Thailand, Monday, Dec. 8, 2025. (AP)
Thai residents who fled homes following clashes between Thai and Cambodian soldiers rest at an evacuation center in Buriram province, Thailand, Monday, Dec. 8, 2025. (AP)
TT
TT

Thailand Launches Airstrikes Along Border with Cambodia as Tensions Reignite 

Thai residents who fled homes following clashes between Thai and Cambodian soldiers rest at an evacuation center in Buriram province, Thailand, Monday, Dec. 8, 2025. (AP)
Thai residents who fled homes following clashes between Thai and Cambodian soldiers rest at an evacuation center in Buriram province, Thailand, Monday, Dec. 8, 2025. (AP)

Thailand launched airstrikes along the disputed border with Cambodia on Monday as both sides accused the other of breaking a ceasefire that halted fighting earlier this year.

Longstanding border disputes erupted into five days of combat in July that killed dozens of soldiers and civilians. US President Donald Trump pushed the Southeast Asian neighbors to sign a truce agreement in October, but tensions have continued to simmer.

The Thai ministry of defense said that more than 35,000 people have left areas near the border for shelters and more are believed to have fled to stay with relatives elsewhere, while Cambodia's Information Minister Neth Pheaktra said that residents of several villages near the border have been evacuated.

Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said in a televised speech that military operations would be carried out as necessary to defend the country and protect public safety.

“Thailand has never wished for violence. I'd like to reiterate that Thailand has never initiated a fight or an invasion, but will never tolerate a violation of its sovereignty,” he said.

The ceasefire was strained in early November after Thai troops were injured by land mines, leading Thailand to announce that it would indefinitely suspend implementation of the agreement. Both sides continue to trade accusations over responsibility, even as they are supposed to be cooperating in getting rid of the mines.

Trump said in mid-November that he’d intervened to preserve the ceasefire as tensions simmered between the two countries.

But another brief episode of fighting took place along the border on Sunday, after which both sides said the other fired first. The Thai army said Cambodian fire injured two Thai soldiers and Thai troops retaliated, resulting in an exchange of fire that lasted around 20 minutes. Cambodia said that the Thai side fired first and that its own troops did not retaliate.

On Monday, Thai army spokesperson Maj. Gen. Winthai Suvaree said the Cambodian troops fired first into Thai territory in multiple areas. He said one Thai soldier was killed and four other soldiers were wounded, and civilians were being evacuated from the affected areas.

Thailand used aircraft “to strike military targets in several areas to suppress Cambodian supporting fire attacks,” he said.

Cambodian Defense Ministry spokesperson Maly Socheata said the Thai military attacked the Cambodian troops first on Monday, and that Cambodia did not retaliate during the initial attacks.

“Cambodia urges that Thailand immediately stop all hostile activities that threaten peace and stability in the region,” she said.

The prime minister of regional neighbor Malaysia, Anwar Ibrahim, called for restraint in a statement posted to social media and said that his country is ready to supports efforts to avert further fighting.

“Our region cannot afford to see long-standing disputes slip into cycles of confrontation,” he wrote.

Centuries of rivalry lie beneath territorial dispute Thailand and Cambodia have a history of enmity going back centuries, when they were warring empires.

Their modern territorial claims stem largely from a 1907 map drawn when Cambodia was under French colonial rule, which Thailand has argued is inaccurate.

The International Court of Justice in 1962 awarded sovereignty to Cambodia over an area that included the 1,000-year-old Preah Vihear temple, which still rankles many Thais.

The ceasefire does not spell out a path to resolve the underlying basis of the dispute, the longstanding differences over where the border should run.

World

A Second Flight of Iranian Deportees, Carrying 55, Has Left the US, Iran Says

Iran's and US' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
Iran's and US' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
TT
TT

A Second Flight of Iranian Deportees, Carrying 55, Has Left the US, Iran Says

Iran's and US' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
Iran's and US' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

A second flight carrying Iranians deported from the United States has left America, Iranian officials said, as Washington reportedly planned to send hundreds of prisoners back to the Iranian Republic.

The deportations come as tensions remain high between Iran and the US after America bombed Iranian nuclear sites during Tehran's 12-day war with Israel in June. Activists abroad also have expressed concern about deportees returning to Iran, whose theocracy has been cracking down on intellectuals and executing prisoners at a rate unseen in decades.

A report published Monday by the Mizan news agency, the official mouthpiece of the Iran's judiciary, quoted Iranian Foreign Ministry official Mojtaba Shasti Karimi acknowledging the deportation of 55 Iranians.

“These individuals announced their willingness for return following continuation of anti-immigration and discriminative policy against foreign nationals particularly Iranians by the United States,” Karimi reportedly said.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei also said Sunday there were plans for 55 Iranians to return to their country.

Based on the US claims, “the Iranians were repatriated because of legal reasons and breach of immigration regulations," Baghaei said.

The US government did not immediately acknowledge the deportation flight and it wasn't clear whether the plane had arrived yet in Tehran. The US Department of Homeland Security and State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The Associated Press early Monday.

The deportations represent a collision of a top priority of President Donald Trump — targeting illegal immigration — against a decades-long practice by the US of welcoming Iranian dissidents, exiles and others since the 1979 Iranian Revolution.

In September, Iranian officials acknowledged as many as 400 Iranians could be returned under the Trump administration policy. That month, the first such flight arrived in Tehran.

In the lead up to and after the 1979 revolution, a large number of Iranians fled to the US. In the decades since, the US had been sensitive in allowing those fleeing from Iran over religious, sexual or political persecution to seek residency. Iran has maintained only those facing criminal charges face prosecution, while others can travel freely. However, Tehran has detained Westerns and others with ties abroad in the past to be exchanged in prisoner swaps.

Iran has criticized Washington for hosting dissidents and others in the past. US federal prosecutors have accused Iran of hiring hitmen to target dissidents as well in America.

World

Araghchi: Iran Ready for Serious Nuclear Talks with Washington

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (AP) 
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (AP) 
TT
TT

Araghchi: Iran Ready for Serious Nuclear Talks with Washington

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (AP) 
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (AP) 

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Saturday Tehran is not convinced Washington was ready for real and serious negotiations.

But, the FM added, “If they change their approach and are prepared for a fair and mutually beneficial negotiation, we are prepared as well.”

In an exclusive interview with Japan’s Kyodo News, Araghchi called for Japan to share its expertise with past atomic disasters and help Iran secure facilities severely damaged by recent Israeli and US strikes.

“I have no doubt that Japan has good knowledge on how to improve the safety of nuclear facilities, and that knowledge can be shared with Iran,” he said, citing extensive work on environmental, medical and technical safety measures in the aftermath of nuclear crises.

Also, Araghchi emphasized that potential cooperation would pertain to technical safety, not to inspections, which is an IAEA mandate. “On the technical aspects of these safety challenges, cooperation with Japan can be very useful.”

The Iranian FM then noted that the Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear sites were “perhaps the biggest violation of international law” ever committed against a safeguarded nuclear facility under the monitoring of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Fair and Balanced Negotiations

Touching on the prospects for stalled nuclear talks, Araghchi said Iran is open to diplomacy but only under conditions that guarantee a “fair and balanced” outcome. “It depends on the United States,” he said.

The minister said Tehran remains skeptical about the outcomes of future nuclear talks, due to Washington’s withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear accord and its support for the recent Israeli attacks on Iran.

“If they change their approach and are prepared for a fair and mutually beneficial negotiation, we are prepared as well. But negotiation is different from dictation. For the time being, we are not convinced they are ready for a real, serious negotiation,” he said.

Araghchi explained that the main disagreement remains Washington's refusal to acknowledge Iran's right to peaceful nuclear technology, including uranium enrichment, under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, of which Japan is a member.

“Tehran is prepared to accept limits on levels of enrichment and centrifuge types,” he said, adding that negotiations could proceed quickly once the US takes a reciprocal approach by allowing Iran's peaceful nuclear program and lifting sanctions.

Araghchi then said Iran faces a complex mix of safety and security threats that it has never seen before, citing structural damage and potential radiation leaks after the June strikes.

As there is “no precedent of a peaceful nuclear facility being bombarded,” the foreign chief said, “the strikes exposed a critical procedural gap within the IAEA, in terms of how to inspect such a facility.”

Earlier this year, Iran and the IAEA reached a framework of cooperation during talks in Cairo to define a workable mechanism for inspecting and stabilizing sites damaged by military action.

However, Araghchi said, the agreement was undermined when the United States and the three European parties to the 2015 nuclear deal sought to restore past UN Security Council sanctions.