Yemen's GPC Calls on Bin Daghr to Renounce Recent Statement

Speaker of the Yemeni Shura Council Ahmed Bin Daghr. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
Speaker of the Yemeni Shura Council Ahmed Bin Daghr. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
TT

Yemen's GPC Calls on Bin Daghr to Renounce Recent Statement

Speaker of the Yemeni Shura Council Ahmed Bin Daghr. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
Speaker of the Yemeni Shura Council Ahmed Bin Daghr. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse

Yemen's General People's Congress (GPC) has expressed regret over a recent statement released by the Speaker of the Yemeni Shura Council Ahmed Bin Daghr and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives Abdel Aziz Jubari.

The GPC demanded that Daghr and Jubari take back their statement and stressed that any political stances issued by the party's leadership must first gain internal consensus within the GPC.

The Yemeni party reaffirmed that legitimacy in Yemen, embodied symbolically by President Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi, is gained through references, the constitution, international resolutions, and regional and global recognition.

For its part, the Yemeni House of Representatives described the statement by Bin Daghr and Jubari as shocking. It said that it exclusively reflects an individual opinion unrelated to the House of Representatives.

Furthermore, the House of Representatives slammed the statement's content as nonbeneficial to the interests of Yemenis.

The GPC warned that any derogation from the internationally recognized legitimacy includes acknowledgment of the legitimacy of the de-facto authority imposed by the Houthi militias and the Iranian project in Yemen.

The party also pointed out that the Saudi-led Arab Coalition continues to provide multi-faceted support to Yemen's legitimate institutions, warning that insulting the Coalition and its sacrifices only serves the Houthi coup in Yemen and Iran.

In a statement, the GPC rejected any acknowledgments of the military option failing, especially that national heroes from the National Army and pro-government resistance continue to fight and show steadfastness in battlefronts across the nation.

Meanwhile, an official source at the Defense Ministry voiced their surprise towards the issuance of what they described as "an irresponsible statement by some official figures who exploit calling for peace and stopping the war in the wrong context and improper timing."

The source, quoted under the conditions of anonymity by the Saba news agency, stressed that the war in Yemen was waged by Iran-backed Houthi militias.

"The war waged by the terrorist Houthi militia with Iranian support is a war imposed on the Yemenis and their armed forces," said the source.

"It is the choice of the militias who believe that war and weapons are the only means to impose their control over the Yemenis, undermine the state, and break the constants of the Yemeni nation represented by republic, unity, democracy, and equality," they added.



Aoun: Lebanon Can No Longer Accommodate More Displaced Syrians

Syrian refugees at a camp in the town of Saadnayel in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley last June. (AFP)
Syrian refugees at a camp in the town of Saadnayel in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley last June. (AFP)
TT

Aoun: Lebanon Can No Longer Accommodate More Displaced Syrians

Syrian refugees at a camp in the town of Saadnayel in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley last June. (AFP)
Syrian refugees at a camp in the town of Saadnayel in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley last June. (AFP)

Although around 700,000 displaced Syrians have returned to their country since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in late 2024, the influx into Lebanon has continued. More than 854,000 Syrians remain registered with the UN refugee agency as residing in Lebanon, placing a growing burden on a country already grappling with severe financial and economic crises.

Lebanon has therefore made the issue a priority in its relations with Syria. A Lebanese ministerial delegation visiting Damascus on Monday raised the matter with Syrian authorities, urging them to help facilitate returns and provide incentives to encourage them to go back to overcome their fears and concerns.

President Joseph Aoun also addressed the issue, calling for international assistance.

During a meeting Tuesday with Susanne Raab, director general of the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD), Aoun explained that Lebanon was working to return displaced Syrians to their country, saying the political changes in Syria had removed the reasons for their displacement.

He stressed that Lebanon could no longer accommodate more displaced Syrians and noted that contacts with Syrian authorities were continuing to organize their return in stages.

Aoun urged the international community and humanitarian organizations assisting displaced Syrians in Lebanon to provide that assistance in Syria instead, to encourage them to return.

No clear Syrian response

An official Lebanese source said Beirut was seeking Syria’s cooperation in establishing a mechanism for the planned, organized and safe return of displaced Syrians in stages, rather than returning everyone at once.

The source told Asharq Al-Awsat that Lebanon was also asking international organizations to limit funding and assistance currently provided to displaced Syrians to those who return to Syria, on the grounds that the circumstances that originally forced them to leave no longer exist.

Lebanon has yet to receive clear or definitive responses from Syrian authorities to these requests, according to the source, who identified the continued influx of Syrians into Lebanon as a major concern.

“It is true that around 700,000 people have returned to Syria since the fall of the former regime, but at the same time, large numbers of Syrians have entered Lebanon during the same period. This means that return figures alone do not reflect the full picture,” the source added.

UNHCR figures

According to records from the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Lebanon currently hosts 854,633 registered Syrian refugees, along with 12,218 refugees and asylum-seekers of other nationalities.

Official figures also show that approximately 700,000 Syrians registered with UNHCR in Lebanon returned to Syria between December 2024 and the end of September 2026.

A UN-supported voluntary return program was launched in July 2025 to assist Syrians wishing to return home. Since then, 23 organized return trips have taken place, including a convoy that departed from Tripoli last week carrying 61 returnees.

UNHCR spokesperson in Lebanon Dalal Harb explained that the program supports those wishing to return by providing information, legal assistance, transportation and cash assistance through official border crossings.

Returning families receive a one-time cash grant of $100 per returning individual to help cover logistical arrangements associated with their return through official border crossings. Some particularly vulnerable families qualify for an additional one-time payment of $300 per household.

Inside Syria, eligible households among the most vulnerable groups may receive cash assistance of up to $600 per family, depending on an assessment of their circumstances and the program’s established criteria.

‘Syria Is Home’

To help refugees make informed decisions, UNHCR operates an online platform called “Syria Is Home”, which provides practical information on documentation requirements, housing, healthcare, education and return procedures.

UNHCR and its partners inside Syria also offer legal assistance, guidance, counseling and referrals to relevant authorities.

Harb told Asharq Al-Awsat that since the fall of the former regime, “refugees have increasingly expressed their intention to return to their country, whether now or in the near future.”

However, she noted that many refugees remain hesitant to make the decision because of uncertainty surrounding conditions in Syria in both the short and long term.

According to Harb, their main concerns include safety and security, unresolved housing issues, particularly whether they have homes to return to, access to essential services such as education and livelihood opportunities, land and property issues, and the availability of humanitarian assistance after their return.

A national priority

Many believe that the return of Syrian refugees is a priority for the Lebanese government rather than the Syrian government, which is occupied with addressing numerous other challenges.

Syrian writer and political researcher Dr. Maher al-Tamran, however, stressed that “the issue of return must be a Syrian national priority.”

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Tamran explained that “genuine incentives go beyond facilitating border crossings or providing financial assistance. They begin with ensuring legal security, protecting property rights and providing housing, education, healthcare and employment opportunities.”

Tamran acknowledged that the return issue “exceeds the financial capabilities of both countries,” but emphasized that this “does not absolve them of their political responsibility.”

“Lebanon wants to ease the economic and social burdens resulting from the refugee presence, while Syria needs to regain its human resources. But neither country can achieve sustainable returns without an international partnership,” he explained.

“What is needed is a shift from funding relief to financing recovery through an international fund to reintegrate returnees. Most importantly, assistance must not become a means of pressuring refugees,” he added.


Humanitarian, Security Conditions Deteriorate in Gaza as Armed Group Attacks Continue

 A young Palestinian boy drags scrap metal against the backdrop of destroyed buildings in Nuseirat on November 2, 2026. (AFP)
A young Palestinian boy drags scrap metal against the backdrop of destroyed buildings in Nuseirat on November 2, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Humanitarian, Security Conditions Deteriorate in Gaza as Armed Group Attacks Continue

 A young Palestinian boy drags scrap metal against the backdrop of destroyed buildings in Nuseirat on November 2, 2026. (AFP)
A young Palestinian boy drags scrap metal against the backdrop of destroyed buildings in Nuseirat on November 2, 2026. (AFP)

Humanitarian and security conditions are worsening in Gaza as Israel tightens restrictions on border crossings and the movement of people and goods, while armed groups backed by the Israeli military press ahead with attacks on the ground.

In a surprise move on Tuesday morning, Israel informed Egyptian and Palestinian coordination officials that it planned to block goods and humanitarian aid arriving through the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza, citing alleged smuggling of banned items, mainly cigarettes, tobacco products and other goods Israel prohibits from entering the enclave.

Israel also abruptly turned back more than 20 patients and 35 accompanying relatives who had left for medical treatment through Rafah, citing security concerns. Hours later, the patients were told they could travel after all.

Israel also maintains tight control over shipments entering through the Kerem Shalom crossing. Supplies remain below levels seen before the latest crisis, which halted the flow of goods into Gaza for a full week before limited deliveries resumed about 10 days ago.

The restrictions have triggered "severe shortages of essential goods, record price increases and a near-total collapse in purchasing power," the Gaza Chamber of Commerce said.

Maher al-Tabbaa, the chamber's director, said Israel was allowing only about 200 types of goods into Gaza under stringent restrictions.

Prices have surged by 500% to 600%, while those of goods barred by Israel have soared by between 2,000% and 3,000%, he told a press briefing.

Armed groups raid displacement camp

Gaza's worsening humanitarian crisis has been matched by deteriorating security, with Israeli airstrikes continuing alongside operations by armed groups based in areas occupied by Israeli forces.

Under a ceasefire agreement based on a plan proposed by US President Donald Trump, a conceptual boundary known as the "yellow line" separates Israeli-occupied territory in eastern Gaza, covering more than 60% of the enclave, from areas to the west controlled by Hamas and other Palestinian factions.

In an operation described as mirroring Israeli military tactics, armed men infiltrated a displacement camp near Abu Hamid roundabout in central-eastern Khan Younis shortly after midnight between Sunday and Monday, under the cover of Israeli drones flying overhead.

The gunmen entered on foot before reinforcements arrived in four-wheel-drive vehicles, allowing them to seize control of the camp and surround it.

They then ordered several people to surrender over loudspeakers, only to discover that none of those sought were there, a source on the ground told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Three sources and eyewitnesses living near the camp said the gunmen searched tents and opened fire, terrifying residents, particularly women and children.

They abducted more than 35 members of the Barbakh family, including teenage boys, and took them to areas under their control in eastern Khan Younis, the sources said.

More than 10 hours later, the armed groups released all but four of those abducted, keeping the four young men for questioning.

A source on the ground quoted some of those released as saying they had been interrogated by Israeli officers, not the armed men who had handed them over to Israeli forces stationed nearby.

A source from a Palestinian faction in Khan Younis said the raid was intended to "spread chaos and flex the muscles" of armed groups backed by the Israeli military.

Another source said the operation could be a prelude to an Israeli advance aimed at expanding the territory under its control and pushing the yellow line farther west.

The boundary lies just a few hundred meters from the camp, the source said, pointing to similar Israeli advances in other parts of Gaza.


Fears of Armed Factions Spiraling Out of Control in Renewed War Spur Iraqi Contacts

Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataib Hezbollah gather in a mourning procession for one of their comrades who was killed the previous day in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. (AFP)
Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataib Hezbollah gather in a mourning procession for one of their comrades who was killed the previous day in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Fears of Armed Factions Spiraling Out of Control in Renewed War Spur Iraqi Contacts

Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataib Hezbollah gather in a mourning procession for one of their comrades who was killed the previous day in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. (AFP)
Members of Iraq's pro-Iran paramilitary group Kataib Hezbollah gather in a mourning procession for one of their comrades who was killed the previous day in a strike in Basra, during the funeral in Baghdad on April 8, 2026. (AFP)

Iraqi officials fear Iran-backed armed factions could spiral out of control if fighting with the United States resumes, as conflicting reports of an airstrike on a security facility in eastern Iraq, denied by Baghdad, add to tensions.

A senior source in the ruling Coordination Framework alliance said the government was working to keep Iraq out of a new conflict by negotiating directly with armed factions to persuade them to remain neutral.

The talks are being conducted through influential intermediaries, the source said.

Baghdad is also deploying security forces to poorly controlled areas and remote locations outside major cities, as it recently did in Basra province, to prevent armed groups from attacking neighboring countries if war breaks out.

But the source, who is familiar with internal discussions on the regional escalation, cast doubt on the government's ability to contain the fallout from a war.

He said Baghdad could struggle to rein in Iran-backed factions or safeguard Iraqi oil exports, which have recently recovered to more than 3 million barrels per day.

Even before regional tensions intensified, the government was struggling to resolve the issue of weapons held by armed factions. Doubts over its disarmament strategy have deepened since a deadline to bring those weapons under state control was pushed back from Sept. 30 to June 30, 2027.

The Coordination Framework had been negotiating with the factions through a political committee of senior political figures.

But amid mounting fears of renewed war, reports have circulated widely that Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi opened a separate channel of communication with the armed groups, bypassing the committee.

A political source told Asharq Al-Awsat that Iran-backed factions may have updated their lists of targets inside Iraq and across the region as the prospect of war grows.

Saud al-Saedi, a lawmaker from the Hoquq Movement, the political wing of the Kataib Hezbollah faction, denied that al-Zaidi had personally intervened in the negotiations.

Saedi told reporters that the Coordination Framework had reached understandings with the factions on reorganizing their weapons.

The plan called for a joint committee bringing together representatives of the factions, the government, the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) and the Coordination Framework, he said.

But al-Zaidi has yet to sign the agreement, Saedi added, suggesting that the prime minister was under US pressure.

US warning

Meanwhile, Washington has stepped up pressure on Baghdad over weapons outside state control, according to political sources cited by local news agency Shafaq News.

The sources said Steven Fagin, the US charge d'affaires in Iraq, had delivered direct warnings to government and political figures in recent days, stressing that Washington was closely monitoring efforts to bring weapons under state control.

Failure to honor commitments or produce a concrete plan to end the presence of weapons beyond state control by June 30 could prompt Washington to designate Iraq a "state sponsor of terrorism" and impose sanctions and other measures, the sources quoted Fagin as warning.

As Baghdad remains silent on the possibility of renewed war, armed factions have largely adopted the same approach.

But the Ansar Allah al-Awfiya movement, an ally of former Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, broke that silence last Friday, warning Washington against using Iraqi territory or airspace to attack Iran while pledging neutrality if war erupts.

The movement's spokesperson, Ali al-Fatlawi, said it would remain neutral as long as Iraq was not used as a launchpad for attacks on neighboring countries.

He also urged Washington not to violate Iraqi airspace.

"Any violation of Iraqi sovereignty will prompt a response from the movement," Fatlawi said, adding that its leadership would decide the nature of that response according to the circumstances.

In recent days, armed factions and affiliated media outlets reported dozens of incursions into Iraqi airspace by US warplanes and reconnaissance aircraft.

The claims coincided with western media reports that US and Israeli fighter jets had conducted exercises over Iraq and several other countries in the region, simulating strikes on Iran.

On Tuesday, media reports said a Popular Mobilization Forces facility in the eastern province of Diyala had come under air attack.

But Lieutenant General Saad Maan, an official with Iraq's Security Media Cell, dismissed the reports.

"There is no truth to reports of any attack or airstrike in the province," he said in a brief statement.