Middle Eastern Countries on Brink of Wheat Crisis

The destroyed silo sits in rubble and debris after an explosion at the seaport of Beirut, Lebanon, on August 5, 2020. (AP)
The destroyed silo sits in rubble and debris after an explosion at the seaport of Beirut, Lebanon, on August 5, 2020. (AP)
TT

Middle Eastern Countries on Brink of Wheat Crisis

The destroyed silo sits in rubble and debris after an explosion at the seaport of Beirut, Lebanon, on August 5, 2020. (AP)
The destroyed silo sits in rubble and debris after an explosion at the seaport of Beirut, Lebanon, on August 5, 2020. (AP)

Since the eruption of the Russian-Ukrainian tensions, fears have emerged that the global wheat and grain markets will be severely affected, given that the two countries secure an important part of global exports.

Russia and Ukraine account for 29% of world wheat exports, 19% of corn exports, and 80% of global exports of sunflower oil.

Since the launch of Russia's invasion against Ukraine on Thursday, wheat prices on the Chicago Stock Exchange have risen to their highest level in nine and a half years, while the conflict threatens to disrupt the flow of supplies from the region.

Meanwhile, European wheat futures jumped to a record peak, and wheat prices reached 344 euros per ton at the Euronext group, which operates a number of European stock exchanges.

Ukraine is a major exporter of corn, most of which goes to China and the European Union. Russia is also competing in supplying wheat to major buyers, such as Egypt and Turkey.

An adviser to the Ukrainian president’s chief aide said the army suspended commercial shipping in Ukrainian ports after Russian forces invaded the country, fueling fears of supply disruption.

Officials and sources in the grain sector had previously said Russia also indefinitely suspended the movement of commercial ships in the Azov Sea, but kept its ports on the Black Sea open to navigation.

In the midst of this political dilemma, the countries of the Middle East, mainly Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq and the Maghreb countries, are threatened with a serious problem, as their major reliance on Ukrainian and Russian wheat would be difficult to compensate from other markets.

Lebanon faces a severe crisis

Lebanon had lost its grain storage capacity since the massive explosion that rocked the port of Beirut in August 2020 and destroyed the wheat silos.

On Friday, Lebanese Economy Minister Amin Salam told Reuters that wheat reserves were sufficient for one month at most, adding that he was seeking to conclude import agreements from different countries amid market concerns over the Ukrainian crisis.

He added that Lebanon, which imports nearly 60% of its wheat from Ukraine, was in talks with other countries including the United States and India to import wheat.

“We don’t want to create a state of panic, we have positive indicators,” the minister told Reuters.

Earlier on Friday, Georges Berbari, the ministry’s general director of grains and sugar beets, told Reuters that Lebanon’s wheat reserves were enough for 1.5-2 months.

Two wheat shipments headed for Lebanon were being loaded in Ukraine, but they have been delayed by the war, he revealed.

Distress call from Yemen

The World Food Program (WFP) warned on Thursday that the war in Ukraine would likely increase fuel and food prices in war-torn Yemen, which could push more residents into starvation as aid funding dwindles.

The WFP has had to cut food rations for eight million people in Yemen, as the seven-year war between the government and the Iran-backed Houthi militias has pushed the country to the brink of famine.

“The escalation of conflict in Ukraine is likely to further increase fuel and food prices and especially grains in the import-dependent country,” said a WFP statement on Thursday.

It added: “Food prices have more than doubled across much of Yemen over the past year, leaving more than half of the country in need of food assistance.”

“We have no choice but to take food from the hungry to feed the starving and, unless we receive immediate funding, in a few weeks we risk not even being able to feed the starving,” the WFP statement cited WFP Executive Director David Beasley as saying.

“This will be hell on earth,” he warned.

A daunting task

In Egypt, the most populous Arab state and the world’s biggest importer of wheat, the authorities will scramble to find urgent alternatives to feed 100 million citizens, with the country importing about 40% of its needs from Russia and Ukraine.

However, multi-pronged moves are likely to solve the crisis, including the local expansion of wheat cultivations and diversification of imports, in addition to having reasonable reserves that are enough for six months.

Moreover, the country’s local production is sufficient to produce daily bread, Dr. Saad Nassar, economist and advisor to the Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture, told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Egypt’s state grains buyer, the General Authority for Supply Commodities (GASC), cancelled its international purchasing tender on Thursday because of a lack of offers. The Authority received one offer at $399 a ton for 60,000 tons of French wheat on a free-on-board (FOB) basis in its international tender on Thursday, traders said.

Reassuring messages

In Tunisia, the Ministry of Agriculture revealed the availability of sufficient grain stock to cover local needs until next May.

Abdel Sattar Fihri, Director of Supply at the Grain Office, said that about 80% of Tunisia’s grain imports came from Russia and Ukraine, which necessitates taking precautionary measures as the crisis could last long and impact shipments.

He added that the Ministry of Agriculture had ordered a search for other markets, such as Bulgaria, Romania, Uruguay and Argentina, for new bid requests, and to avoid Russia and Ukraine during this period.

Similarly, a spokesman for the Iraqi Ministry of Trade said on Thursday that his country has a sufficient strategic stock of wheat from its purchases from local farmers, adding that he was not worried about reserves. But he added that Iraq might resort to the market to buy wheat if the crisis between Russia and Ukraine is prolonged.



Trump Seeks to Close $1.6 trillion Revenue Gap with Raft of New Tariffs

US President Donald Trump speaks before signing the "Genius Act", which will develop regulatory framework for stablecoin cryptocurrencies and expand oversight of the industry, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, July 18, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo
US President Donald Trump speaks before signing the "Genius Act", which will develop regulatory framework for stablecoin cryptocurrencies and expand oversight of the industry, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, July 18, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo
TT

Trump Seeks to Close $1.6 trillion Revenue Gap with Raft of New Tariffs

US President Donald Trump speaks before signing the "Genius Act", which will develop regulatory framework for stablecoin cryptocurrencies and expand oversight of the industry, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, July 18, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo
US President Donald Trump speaks before signing the "Genius Act", which will develop regulatory framework for stablecoin cryptocurrencies and expand oversight of the industry, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, July 18, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo

The Trump administration this week stepped up its ambitious effort to replace about $1.6 trillion in lost tariff revenue that was eliminated by the Supreme Court's decision to strike down a range of the president's import taxes.

Recovering that lost revenue, which the White House was counting on to help offset the steep, multi-trillion dollar cost of its tax cuts, is possible but will be challenging, experts say. The administration has to use different legal provisions to impose new duties, and those provisions require longer, complex processes that US companies can use to seek exemptions. It could be months or more before it is clear how much revenue the replacement tariffs will yield.

“I wouldn't bet against this administration being able to get back on paper the same effective tariff rate they had before," said Elena Patel, co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. But the new approach will “make it easier for people to contest the tariffs, which is going to put a big asterisk on the revenue until all that is settled.”

On Wednesday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the administration will investigate 16 economies — including the European Union — over whether their governments are subsidizing excessive factory capacity in a way that disadvantages US manufacturing. The investigation will also cover China, South Korea, and Japan, Greer said.

In addition, he said there would be a second investigation of dozens of countries to see if their failure to ban goods made by forced labor amounts to an unfair trade practice that harms the United States. That investigation will also cover the EU and China, as well as Mexico, Canada, Australia, and Brazil.

Both investigations are being conducted under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, which requires the administration to consult with the targeted countries, as well as hold public hearings and allow affected US industries to comment. A hearing as part of the factory capacity investigation will be held May 5, while a hearing on the forced labor investigation will occur April 28.

It's a far cry from the emergency law that President Donald Trump relied on in his first year in office, which allowed him to immediately impose tariffs on any country, at nearly any level, simply by issuing an executive order.

Moments after the Supreme Court's ruling, Trump imposed a 10% tariff on all imports under a separate legal authority, but that duty can only last for 150 days. The president has said he would raise it to 15%, the maximum allowed, but has yet to do so. Some two dozen states have already challenged the new tariffs. The administration is aiming to complete its Section 301 investigations before the 10% duties expire.

The effort underscores the importance that the Trump White House has placed on tariffs as a revenue-raiser at a time when the federal government is facing huge annual budget deficits for decades into the future. Previous administrations, by contrast, used tariffs more sparingly to narrowly protect specific industries.

Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation, noted that the first investigation covers roughly 70% of imports, while the second would cover nearly all of them.

“That breadth suggests the goal isn’t to address the issues at hand, but instead to recreate a sweeping tariff tool,” she said, The AP news reported.

Trump sees tariffs as a way to force foreign countries to essentially help pay the cost of US government services, even though all recent economic studies find that American companies and consumers are paying the duties, including ones from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and economists at Harvard University. In his state of the union address last month, Trump even touted his tariffs as a potential replacement for the income tax, which would return the United States’ tax regime to the late 19th century.

Trump also wants tariffs to help pay for the tax cuts he extended in key legislation last year. The tax cut legislation is expected, according to the most recent estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, to add $4.7 trillion to the national debt over a decade, while all Trump's duties, including ones not struck down by the court, were projected to offset about $3 trillion — or two-thirds of that cost.

The court’s ruling Feb. 20 that he could no longer impose emergency tariffs eliminated about $1.6 trillion in expected revenue over the next decade, according to the CBO.

Some of Trump's tariffs remain place, including previous duties on China and Canada that were imposed after earlier 301 investigations. The administration has also slapped tariffs on some specific products, including steel, lumber, and cars. Those, combined with the 10% tariff for part of this year, should yield about $668 billion over the next decade, the Tax Foundation estimates.

“It’s going to take a really big patchwork of these other investigations to make up for the (lost) tariffs,” York said.

The administration's efforts are also unusual because they reflect an overreliance on tariffs to bring in more government revenue. Trump has also said the duties are intended to return manufacturing to the United States, and he has used them to leverage trade deals.

“What makes this really different,” said Kent Smetters, executive director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model, “it is really the first time tariffs have been mainly used as a revenue raiser.”

Patel, meanwhile, argues that raising revenue can be done more reliably and straightforwardly by Congress. Laws like Section 301 are traditionally intended to be used to address specific trade policy concerns in particular countries.

“It’s not supposed to be there to raise revenue,” she said. “If we want to raise revenue through tariffs, then Congress should impose a broad based tariff.”


Japan, South Korea Say Ready to Act Against FX Volatility

FILE PHOTO: Japan's Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama speaks on the day Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi delivers her policy speech in the parliament, in Tokyo, Japan, February 20, 2026. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Japan's Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama speaks on the day Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi delivers her policy speech in the parliament, in Tokyo, Japan, February 20, 2026. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo
TT

Japan, South Korea Say Ready to Act Against FX Volatility

FILE PHOTO: Japan's Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama speaks on the day Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi delivers her policy speech in the parliament, in Tokyo, Japan, February 20, 2026. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Japan's Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama speaks on the day Japan's Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi delivers her policy speech in the parliament, in Tokyo, Japan, February 20, 2026. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo

Japan and South Korea expressed concern on Saturday about the rapid declines in their currencies, saying they were ready to act against excessive foreign-exchange volatility.

Finance Ministers Satsuki Katayama of Japan and Koo Yun-cheol of South Korea "expressed serious concern over the recent sharp depreciation of the Korean won and the Japanese yen," they said in a statement after their annual meeting in Tokyo.

The yen and won have slid as mounting tensions from the US-Israeli war on Iran have driven the dollar higher ⁠on safe-haven demand and ⁠battered the currencies of countries heavily reliant on imported oil.

"Furthermore, they reaffirmed that they will closely monitor foreign exchange markets and continue to take appropriate actions against excessive volatility and disorderly movements in exchange rates," the statement said.

The yen touched its lowest in 20 ⁠months on Friday and is near the line of 160.00 to the dollar that many in the market think might prompt Japan to intervene to support the currency. The won breached a psychological barrier of 1,500 per dollar this month for the first time since March 2009.

Tokyo and Seoul shared the view that significant volatility had emerged in financial markets, including foreign exchange, Katayama told a press conference after the meeting.

"The Japanese government ⁠is ⁠fully prepared to respond at any time, bearing in mind the impact that currency moves may have on people's livelihoods amid surging oil prices, and I believe both sides share that understanding," she said.

Katayama regularly says Japan is ready to act regarding yen moves, although some policymakers privately say that intervening to prop up the yen now could prove futile, as the flood of dollar demand will only intensify if the war persists.


BP Wins US Approval for Kaskida Project in Gulf of Mexico

FILE PHOTO: 3D-printed oil pump jacks and the British Petroleum (BP) logo appear in this illustration taken March 2, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: 3D-printed oil pump jacks and the British Petroleum (BP) logo appear in this illustration taken March 2, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
TT

BP Wins US Approval for Kaskida Project in Gulf of Mexico

FILE PHOTO: 3D-printed oil pump jacks and the British Petroleum (BP) logo appear in this illustration taken March 2, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: 3D-printed oil pump jacks and the British Petroleum (BP) logo appear in this illustration taken March 2, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

British energy major BP has received approval from the Trump administration to advance its Kaskida project in the Gulf of Mexico, a company spokesperson told Reuters in an emailed statement late ⁠on Friday.

The $5 billion ⁠investment would unlock 10 billion barrels of resources that BP has discovered in the Paleogene fields of the US Gulf, the spokesperson said.

The US Department of ⁠the Interior's approval of Kaskida follows a year-long review of the company's development plan, the statement said, according to Reuters.

Bloomberg News first reported on Friday that the Kaskida project is scheduled to start crude production in 2029. The Kaskida project will follow BP’s 2023 start-up of the Argos project, which ⁠was ⁠its first platform launch in the US. Gulf since 2008 and the first since the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

The explosion of BP's Deepwater Horizon rig in April 2010 killed 11 rig workers and caused $70 billion in damages in the largest oil spill in US history.