Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: US Proposal Does Not Guarantee Israeli Freedom of Movement in Lebanon

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meets with US Ambassador to Lebanon Lisa Johnson in Beirut on Thursday. (Parliament's media office)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meets with US Ambassador to Lebanon Lisa Johnson in Beirut on Thursday. (Parliament's media office)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: US Proposal Does Not Guarantee Israeli Freedom of Movement in Lebanon

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meets with US Ambassador to Lebanon Lisa Johnson in Beirut on Thursday. (Parliament's media office)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri meets with US Ambassador to Lebanon Lisa Johnson in Beirut on Thursday. (Parliament's media office)

Efforts to resolve the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon have for the first time entered the negotiations phase.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri received a written US proposal that was followed by discussions with American and Hezbollah officials. The Iran-backed party has tasked its ally Berri with the negotiations.

Lebanon is expected to reply to the US proposal “very soon” with a written message of its own that includes its reservations.

Berri denied to Asharq Al-Awsat that the US proposal included any guarantee for the freedom of movement of the Israeli military inside Lebanon.

The Americans and others know that this is unacceptable and not open for discussion. “There can be no undermining of our sovereignty,” stressed Berri.

He also denied that the proposal had suggested the deployment of NATO or other forces in Lebanon.

Another “unacceptable” point for Lebanon, continued Berri, is the formation of a committee that would oversee the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolution 1701 that helped end the July 2006 war between Hezbollah and Israel and that calls for southern Lebanon to be free of all weapons outside state control.

Berri asserted that a current mechanism to oversee the implementation of the resolution is already available, a reference to the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) that has been monitoring the implementation since 2006.

Regardless of the reservations, the speaker emphasized that the discussions are going ahead positively.

Moreover, he remarked that US envoy Amos Hochstein’s next visit to Lebanon “hinges on progress in the negotiations.”

Asked about Israel’s air strikes on his hometown of Tebnine and the regions of al-Ghobeiry and Bourj al-Barajneh in Beirut where he enjoys popular support, he replied: “It seems that [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu resorts to force when he wants a concession. But he doesn’t know who he is dealing with, and such actions don’t work with us.”



Hezbollah Shuffles its Cards, Adheres to Weapons Control

Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem. (Reuters)
Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem. (Reuters)
TT

Hezbollah Shuffles its Cards, Adheres to Weapons Control

Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem. (Reuters)
Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem. (Reuters)

The rhetoric of Lebanon’s Hezbollah chief on Saturday reaffirmed the party's commitment to its weapons and contradicted the positive atmospheres prevailing in the country after the election of General Jospeh Aoun as President, and the designation of international judge Nawaf Salam to form the new government.

On Saturday, Hezbollah’s Secretary-General, Naim Qassem, stated that "the resistance in Lebanon will remain resilient against the American-Israeli project, continuing to be strong, ready, and loyal to the blood of the martyrs in its mission to liberate the land and Palestine".

Israel and Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire in a conflict parallel to the Gaza war in November. That ceasefire, which was brokered by the United States and France, requires Israeli forces to withdraw from southern Lebanon within 60 days, and for Hezbollah to remove all its fighters and weapons from the south.

Both sides have since accused each other of breaching the ceasefire.

"Don't test our patience and I call on the Lebanese state to deal firmly with these (Israeli) violations that have exceeded 100," Qassem said in a speech delivered during the 13th International Conference titled "Gaza, Symbol of Resistance".

He added saying that the party emerged from the war “with our heads held high”, and that plans to utilize the resistance and its weapons should be discussed within the defense strategy and through dialogue.

He emphasized that "no one will be able to exploit the results of the (Israeli) aggression for internal political gains, as the political process is separate from the status of the resistance".

Qassem's stance comes just days before Israel is set to withdraw from the south, a move that, according to Ghayas Yazbek, a member of the Lebanese Forces bloc, is "dangerous" and will lead to negative consequences for Lebanon. He “is provoking a new Israeli war on Lebanon", he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Qassem’s remarks about insisting on holding on to weapons and to the separation of Resolution 1701 between the southern and northern parts of the Litani River contradict the ceasefire agreement, mainly that these statements come just days before Israel’s planned withdrawal from the areas it occupied in southern Lebanon on January 27, and on the eve of Donald Trump’s inauguration as US President. This could trigger a dangerous escalation from Israel”, Yazbek said.

Qassem’s statement is also an attempt to undermine the credibility of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who had conveyed positive vibes regarding the formation of the new government. The President and the Prime Minister-designate had affirmed that no party in Lebanon will be excluded from the upcoming government.

“Qassem’s rhetoric is a severe blow to the new presidency and premiership”, Yazbek stated, describing it as "an act of blackmail” akin to the tactics Hezbollah employed before the war.

The Secretary-General's remarks coincided with the presence of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in Beirut and came just hours after the official visit of French President Emmanuel Macron to Lebanon.

"Naim Qassem's speech raises concerns among friendly and sisterly countries that have pledged to provide full support to the Lebanese state, and it represents a negative message toward President Macron, who spoke on behalf of the international community”, said Yazbek.

The MP added that the rhetoric “reflects narrow, sectarian agenda of the Shiite community, which has once again entangled the country in crises from which it is desperately trying to extricate itself”.

Sami Nader, Director of the Levant Institute for Strategic Affairs, downplayed the impact of Qassem’s rhetoric on the positive atmospheres prevailing in Lebanon.

Qassem’s remarks are "an attempt to absorb the setback the party faced, a preemptive move regarding the ministerial statement and its potential participation in the new government, as well as a way to gauge the contents of the ministerial statement and interpret the issue of restricting weapons to the state”, Nader told Asharq Al-Awsat.