Despite Threats, Israel Negotiates with France and Britain to Prevent Full Diplomatic Recognition of Palestine

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announcing his government’s recognition of Palestine on Sunday in London (UK Prime Minister’s Office)
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announcing his government’s recognition of Palestine on Sunday in London (UK Prime Minister’s Office)
TT

Despite Threats, Israel Negotiates with France and Britain to Prevent Full Diplomatic Recognition of Palestine

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announcing his government’s recognition of Palestine on Sunday in London (UK Prime Minister’s Office)
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announcing his government’s recognition of Palestine on Sunday in London (UK Prime Minister’s Office)

Even as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened “punitive measures” in response to a wave of international recognitions of a Palestinian state, political sources in Tel Aviv revealed that he was quietly negotiating with France, Britain, and others to prevent such recognition from advancing to the level of full diplomatic relations and ambassadorial exchanges.

According to reports aired by Israel’s Channel 12 on Monday, Netanyahu’s close associates issued warnings of retaliation, such as expelling diplomats or barring their access to Ramallah. However, sources described these statements as “domestic rhetoric” meant to appease his far-right allies, saying that the Israeli premier knew the limits of what he could do when dealing with major world powers.

On Sunday, Netanyahu announced that his government’s formal response to the sweeping recognition of Palestine would be issued only after his return from New York, where he was scheduled to meet US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly.

Israeli analysts interpreted the delay as a signal that he sought measures “directly approved by Washington, and by Trump personally.”

During a closed meeting with his war cabinet on Monday, Netanyahu stressed that “coordination with Washington is an absolute priority in order to counter the international political tsunami.”

According to political sources close to the prime minister, Trump was well aware of Netanyahu’s agenda for the meeting and had begun preparing a position that would keep the Israeli leader’s steps “balanced.”

Netanyahu, they noted, was caught between demands from his far-right coalition - including not only Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir but also members of Likud - to annex the entire West Bank, and Arab warnings that any annexation, however small or symbolic, would trigger sharp retaliation and undermine the Abraham Accords.

Channel 12 reported that following the United Arab Emirates’ strong opposition to annexation, Israel received further messages from Arab capitals warning that “annexation steps would have serious repercussions at all levels.”

Western countries also cautioned Israel that they would respond harshly if it took action against states recognizing Palestine.

Leaks from political sources suggested that Netanyahu was considering measures designed to placate his far-right coalition, such as shifting West Bank “Area B” to the same status as “Area C,” which is already under full Israeli military and civil control, effectively stripping the Palestinian Authority of its administrative powers there.

The sources also claimed that Israel was weighing “a series of sanctions” against countries recognizing a Palestinian state. These could include revoking diplomats’ permits to enter Ramallah and possibly closing their consulates.

According to the report, France’s consulate was a primary target, as Paris had spearheaded, in coordination with Saudi Arabia, efforts to rally collective European recognition of Palestine. Israel reportedly signaled to European governments that it would obstruct any attempt to establish embassies in Ramallah.

Israel was also said to be leveraging the ongoing Gaza war in its talks, while threatening to deploy “two additional divisions in the West Bank, raising the total to 22 divisions, to reinforce security control and prevent operations against Israel.”

Meanwhile, Netanyahu dispatched Defense Minister Israel Katz to the Kiryat Arba settlement to reassure settler leaders. Katz told them that the prime minister supported annexation but wanted to proceed “through a wise diplomatic strategy” that would secure international legitimacy.

According to Hebrew media reports, settler leaders responded that while they “highly valued the government’s intentions,” they fundamentally disagreed with its assessment. “This is the time to annex the entire West Bank to Israel in response to the decisions recognizing the Palestinian state,” they argued.

They further warned that it would be “a mistake to corner Trump or over-consult him on the matter. Israel should take the decision to annex, and it will find that Trump will not stand in its way.”



The Full Story of Lebanon’s Initiative for Negotiations with Israel and its Challenges

President Joseph Aoun meets with French Ambassador to Lebanon Herve Magro at the Baabda presidential palace. (Lebanese Presidency)
President Joseph Aoun meets with French Ambassador to Lebanon Herve Magro at the Baabda presidential palace. (Lebanese Presidency)
TT

The Full Story of Lebanon’s Initiative for Negotiations with Israel and its Challenges

President Joseph Aoun meets with French Ambassador to Lebanon Herve Magro at the Baabda presidential palace. (Lebanese Presidency)
President Joseph Aoun meets with French Ambassador to Lebanon Herve Magro at the Baabda presidential palace. (Lebanese Presidency)

Authorities in Lebanon now see little option but to seek a humanitarian truce during the upcoming Eid al-Fitr, after ceasefire efforts in the war between Israel and Hezbollah collapsed against entrenched positions on both sides.

Israel is demanding Hezbollah’s “complete surrender” before halting operations in Lebanon. The party, in turn, has tied its stance to Iran’s position, after entering the wider conflict involving Tehran, Washington, and Tel Aviv.

A senior Lebanese official told Asharq Al-Awsat that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sent a ceasefire proposal, relayed by French President Emmanuel Macron, to Lebanese President Joseph Aoun 10 days ago.

Hezbollah’s decision to cut communication channels, followed by its launch of its “Al-Asf Al-Maakoul” (Eaten Straw) a wide military operation, derailed the initiative and led to Israel hardening its position.

Hezbollah’s posture remains the main domestic obstacle to ending the war. The group has yet to present a clear political position outlining its readiness to stop the fighting or its objectives, even as it escalates militarily in parallel with diplomatic efforts.

Lebanese delegation

The Lebanese source said no date or venue has been set for talks with Israel, and no formal Israeli response has been received. Messages conveyed through Macron and United Nations Special Coordinator for Lebanon Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert have, however, raised a central question still unanswered by Beirut: if fighting stops, will Hezbollah stop firing rockets?

Lebanon, the source said, cannot afford a delay. Aoun is moving to finalize a negotiating delegation expected to include four figures representing the country’s main sects.

Named so far are former ambassador Simon Karam, a Christian who took part in “mechanism” committee meetings, Foreign Ministry Secretary-General Ambassador Abdel Sattar Issa, a Sunni nominated by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and Shawki Bou Nassar, a Druze figure named by senior Druze leader Walid Jumblatt.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri is still refusing to name a Shiite representative, conditioning this on a ceasefire and the return of displaced people.

He has also yet to respond to a proposal to appoint a member to a parallel “shadow delegation” to accompany the talks. The source said Israel is insisting, through indirect messages, on the inclusion of a Shiite member.

The source said Berri could prove pivotal, as the only figure capable of exerting pressure on Hezbollah at this stage and beyond.

Israel’s Maariv newspaper, citing Israeli sources, said Tel Aviv sees Berri as able to either back or block any move. While he opposes negotiations under fire and insists on a ceasefire first, Israeli assessments suggest he could later endorse any understandings that align with Lebanon’s interests and internal balance, providing political cover for Hezbollah to accept them.

United States

The source said Washington’s silence should not be read as negative. The US is fully focused on its conflict with Iran, but has not given Israel a free hand in Lebanon, otherwise the situation would look different.

He added that Aoun’s initiative has been well received in Washington, with President Donald Trump’s adviser for African affairs, Massad Boulos, and the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, officially tasked with following the file and leading the expected negotiations.

Negotiations under fire

The source ruled out a near-term end to Israeli operations, saying Aoun is pressing ahead on the basis that negotiations under fire are better than negotiations after devastation.

The president fears what Israel may be preparing for Lebanon in the coming period and is seeking to avert it before it is too late, the source said.

The displacement crisis is placing severe strain on state institutions amid a lack of external support. The source questioned who would fund reconstruction given regional instability and global economic pressures.

During a visit to Beirut last week, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres launched a $308 million humanitarian appeal for displaced people, but only about $100 million has been raised, far short of the needs of 1.3 million displaced.

Hezbollah's weapons

Aoun’s initiative does not aim at a peace deal with Israel, but at technical talks starting with a ceasefire, an Israeli withdrawal, prisoner releases, and border demarcation, the source said.

Hezbollah’s weapons would then become an inevitable issue, with no remaining justification, to be handled firmly in line with government decisions and Lebanon’s interest that arms be held exclusively by the state.

Aoun and the government had opted to address the issue through dialogue, but tougher measures would be a last resort if Hezbollah fails to respond to what serves Lebanon’s interests, particularly those of the Shiite community, which the source said has paid a heavy price for entering a new “support war” with an unfavorable balance of power and no clear military horizon.

The Lebanese army has already begun tightening its grip on armed Hezbollah members, who can no longer move weapons or fighters freely through checkpoints in the south. The army is now aware of multiple sites it could target after the war ends.

The source rejected claims that the war is existential for Lebanon’s Shiites, describing them as a founding community with strong representation across state institutions and parliament, never marginalized.

He said they are expected to play a central role in rebuilding Lebanon and supporting its stability and prosperity, adding that reducing the community to a single party or movement is not realistic.


Sudan Clinics Could Run Out of Supplies in Weeks Due to Middle East War, Warns NGO

Sudanese women lie in beds as they receive treatment for dengue fever at Omdurman Hospital, as Sudan grapples with outbreaks of dengue and cholera amid the annual rainy season and a collapsed healthcare and infrastructure system, in Khartoum, Sudan, September 23, 2025. (Reuters)
Sudanese women lie in beds as they receive treatment for dengue fever at Omdurman Hospital, as Sudan grapples with outbreaks of dengue and cholera amid the annual rainy season and a collapsed healthcare and infrastructure system, in Khartoum, Sudan, September 23, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Sudan Clinics Could Run Out of Supplies in Weeks Due to Middle East War, Warns NGO

Sudanese women lie in beds as they receive treatment for dengue fever at Omdurman Hospital, as Sudan grapples with outbreaks of dengue and cholera amid the annual rainy season and a collapsed healthcare and infrastructure system, in Khartoum, Sudan, September 23, 2025. (Reuters)
Sudanese women lie in beds as they receive treatment for dengue fever at Omdurman Hospital, as Sudan grapples with outbreaks of dengue and cholera amid the annual rainy season and a collapsed healthcare and infrastructure system, in Khartoum, Sudan, September 23, 2025. (Reuters)

Medical supplies to clinics dealing with the humanitarian crisis in Sudan could run out within two weeks unless shipments are rapidly rerouted after disruptions due to the conflict in the Middle East, the charity Save the Children said.

The expanding US-Israeli war on Iran has shaken global supply chains, with airspace closures and the halt of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

Some $600,000 worth of essential medicines are stuck in ports in Dubai, the charity said. About ‌90 Sudanese government-run ‌clinics serving roughly 400,000 patients rely on the ‌charity's ⁠supply of medicines, ⁠vaccines and nutritional treatment, with no in-country alternative, Save the Children's global director of supply chain, Willem Zuidema, told Reuters.

Sudan's three-year conflict has displaced millions of people and triggered one of the world's largest humanitarian crises.

"We have a couple of weeks to do this rerouting before the country's stocks run out. The clock is ticking," Zuidema said, adding that once buffer stocks are ⁠exhausted patients would not be able to access basic ‌healthcare support.

The medicines, which include antibiotics, ‌antimalarials, pain and fever medication, and pediatric injectable drugs, normally enter via Port Sudan ‌and travel by road to areas including Darfur.

UN aid chief Tom Fletcher ‌said last week the Middle East conflict is straining humanitarian supply chains, with sub-Saharan Africa and Gaza under particular pressure.

RISING COSTS, DONOR CUTS COMPOUND CRISIS

The World Health Organization also warned of growing medical supply shortages in Sudan.

"There's a huge ‌crunch in Sudan, of course, and there's also a bigger crunch in medical commodities going into certain provinces," WHO ⁠regional director ⁠Hanan Balkhy said.

Rising transport costs are impacting aid budgets heavily constrained by major donor cuts, Save the Children said, with container freight rates rising about 25–30% as some shipping firms reroute vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, adding weeks to delivery times.

The level of disruption to freight and subsequent cost impact may be worse than in the initial stages of the Ukraine war and COVID pandemic, because there is little buffer in the system after the aid cuts, Zuidema said.

"Demand will go up, but the means for us to respond - especially with the increasing fuel prices driving up cost - will go down. That's extremely worrying."

Save the Children's country budget for Sudan this year has been slashed by $4 million to $98 million.


Lebanon Transfers More Than 130 Syrian Prisoners Under Bilateral Agreement

 The Masnaa border crossing between Lebanon and Syria. (AFP file)
The Masnaa border crossing between Lebanon and Syria. (AFP file)
TT

Lebanon Transfers More Than 130 Syrian Prisoners Under Bilateral Agreement

 The Masnaa border crossing between Lebanon and Syria. (AFP file)
The Masnaa border crossing between Lebanon and Syria. (AFP file)

Lebanon transferred more than 130 Syrian detainees to their home country on Tuesday, a Lebanese judicial official and Syrian state media said, as part of an agreement the two sides signed last month.

Overcrowded Lebanese prisons host more than 2,200 Syrians held on various charges.

Many are still awaiting trial, while hundreds have been brought before military courts on charges of "terrorism" or related offences, including attacks on Lebanese forces.

Others are in custody for alleged membership in extremist or armed groups that were opposed to now ousted Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, who was supported by Lebanon's Hezbollah group during the Syrian civil war.

The judicial official told AFP that "106 convicted inmates were released from Roumieh Prison (north of Beirut), in addition to 31 others from Qobbeh Prison in Tripoli" in the country's north.

"The convoy headed to the Masnaa crossing to hand them over to the Syrian side," the official added.

Syrian state news agency SANA later reported that the detainees had reached the Syrian side of the border crossing.

It is the first batch of prisoners to be transferred under an agreement signed between the two countries in February, which will cover almost 300 convicts who have served 10 years or more in Lebanese prisons.

Under the agreement, they will be required to complete the remainder of their sentences in Syria.

"Today, the implementation of the agreement on the Syrian detainees in Lebanon and the mechanism to transport them to Syrian territory has begun," SANA quoted the charge d'affaires at Syria's embassy in Beirut, Iyad al-Hazzaa, as saying.

He said 136 detainees were among the first group, with those remaining to follow "upon completion of the necessary procedures for their release".

It was not immediately clear why there was a discrepancy in the reported number of detainees.

The issue of the detainees had been a sticking point in Beirut-Damascus relations following Assad's overthrow in December 2024.

Over the past year, both sides have repeatedly expressed their determination to open a new chapter in bilateral ties.