Egypt FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: Trump Himself Is the Real Guarantee for Implementing His Gaza Plan

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty delivers his country’s address at the UN General Assembly meetings in New York last month. (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty delivers his country’s address at the UN General Assembly meetings in New York last month. (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
TT

Egypt FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: Trump Himself Is the Real Guarantee for Implementing His Gaza Plan

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty delivers his country’s address at the UN General Assembly meetings in New York last month. (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty delivers his country’s address at the UN General Assembly meetings in New York last month. (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty stressed that “the foremost guarantee” for the implementation of US President Donald Trump’s plan to end the war in Gaza “is Trump himself.”

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Abdelatty said that Trump “clearly stated and reaffirmed his personal commitment to carrying out the plan and achieving security, stability, and peace in the Middle East.”

Abdelatty, together with Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly, attended a meeting with Trump last month on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York. The meeting brought together several Arab and Islamic leaders, including representatives from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Türkiye.

His remarks come ahead of a new round of negotiations scheduled in Cairo on Monday to discuss the first phase of Trump’s plan between Israel and Hamas under international mediation. The talks will take place amid growing concerns among Palestinian factions that Israel might backtrack on its commitments.

According to Abdelatty, Trump “reiterated his pledges and conveyed his determination to achieve peace in the Middle East through messages directed to Arab and Islamic leaders during the New York meeting.”

His comments align with the assessment of Arab and European diplomatic sources who say that Trump is “the only one capable of twisting the arm” of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who initially agreed to the plan, including the creation of a Palestinian state, but later declared upon his return to Israel that he “has not and will not accept” such a state.

Cairo, Abdelatty noted, welcomes Hamas’ response to the US initiative, describing it as “a reflection of the movement’s and other Palestinian factions’ sense of responsibility, as they take into account the fate of the Palestinian people and the protection of civilians.”

He outlined the main “positives” in Trump’s proposal, including “ending the war, rejecting annexation, and halting displacement,” emphasizing that these “are essential and powerful elements that we can build upon to make the plan viable and applicable on the ground.”

“The Palestinian response is a very positive step in the right direction, which we highly value. We now expect the other side, Israel, to fulfill its commitments under the plan so that both parties carry out their obligations,” he added.

The FM acknowledged that certain details still require discussion and clarification within the framework of the US proposal, saying that the plan “serves as a general framework to stop the war, end the bloodshed, deliver humanitarian aid, release hostages, and return remains.”

“These details,” he said, “will be addressed through technical-level negotiations to create suitable conditions and an enabling environment for implementation.”

He noted that the upcoming Cairo meetings would see technical and security discussions aimed at completing the first stage, which includes “the release of prisoners from both sides and the repatriation of Israeli remains as a first step, to be followed by later phases.”

When asked whether Netanyahu might ignore Washington’s call for an immediate ceasefire, especially after reports that at least 30 Palestinians were killed on the first day following the US request, Abdelatty replied: “We always rely on President Trump’s leadership and resolve in enforcing his important plan to end this war and bring about peace. He is the only one capable of making Israel comply.”

He added: “What matters now is that the Arab and Islamic worlds, along with the international community, have welcomed this plan. Our duty is to work collectively to ensure its implementation. Egypt remains in close coordination with the United States and all concerned parties to translate the plan’s provisions into action.”

Addressing questions about the proposed “international stabilization force,” Abdelatty clarified that Egypt “does not reject the idea of deploying such a force; on the contrary, it supports it, but insists that several key conditions must be met: its mandate must be clearly defined, it must be established by a UN Security Council resolution, and its functions must be explicitly outlined.”

The force should “support the Palestinian police, who are responsible for maintaining security and enforcing the law inside Gaza, as in the West Bank. It should also strengthen national unity between the two regions, since Gaza and the West Bank together form the foundation of the future Palestinian state. Egypt cannot accept their separation,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Abdelatty tied Egypt’s potential participation in such a force to the inclusion of the United States, saying: “We are talking about a multinational force in which the US must play a key and effective role. Eventually, there should also be a presence in the West Bank to reinforce the organic link between the two territories.”

He explained that “security arrangements should primarily be handled by the Palestinians themselves in managing their daily affairs, while the international force would assist the Palestinian police, provide external border security, and offer training and technical support.”

Such a deployment, he added, should be temporary - “a transitional period determined by the UN Security Council, with the goal of enabling the Palestinian Authority to take full control of Gaza and reinforce unity between the West Bank and the Strip.”

When asked about the issue of Hamas’ weapons, Abdelatty described it as “a purely Palestinian matter to be resolved internally.” He noted that Hamas has agreed to Trump’s plan, and this issue will be handled within the Palestinian framework.



UN Chief Warns Cash Crunch Threatens Palestinian Refugee Agency

Displaced Palestinians gather to receive hot meals distributed by a charity kitchen in the Khan Younis refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip on June 29, 2026. (AFP)
Displaced Palestinians gather to receive hot meals distributed by a charity kitchen in the Khan Younis refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip on June 29, 2026. (AFP)
TT

UN Chief Warns Cash Crunch Threatens Palestinian Refugee Agency

Displaced Palestinians gather to receive hot meals distributed by a charity kitchen in the Khan Younis refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip on June 29, 2026. (AFP)
Displaced Palestinians gather to receive hot meals distributed by a charity kitchen in the Khan Younis refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip on June 29, 2026. (AFP)

UN chief Antonio Guterres warned Tuesday of the "increasingly precarious" situation of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees known as UNRWA, saying that millions of people's livelihoods were at risk.

The secretary-general said that further funding cuts for UNRWA -- which Israel has criticized as politically biased -- could "push conditions beyond breaking point."

Because of insufficient funding, UNRWA has scaled back its operations since the start of the year.

"As we meet here today, the safety and welfare of millions of Palestine refugees hangs in the balance," Guterres told a donor conference for the UN agency.

He noted the "utterly appalling" living conditions in Gaza, violence by Israeli settlers in the West Bank and Israeli strikes on Lebanon.

"It [UNRWA] faces sweeping restrictions throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory. And a cash shortfall that imperils its work across the region," Guterres said.

"I am appalled by continuing efforts to marginalize and undermine UNRWA through disinformation, smear campaigns, legislative actions, operational restrictions, diplomatic roadblocks and more," he said.

Israel has long opposed UNRWA, created by the UN General Assembly in 1949, and intensified its criticism after October 7, alleging that employees participated in the deadly 2023 attack on Israel.


Hundreds of Thousands of Lebanese Head Home as Fighting Eases, Many Still Stranded

Lebanese people drive a vehicle loaded with mattresses as they return to their village in the town of Nabatieh, southern Lebanon, 23 June 2026, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. (EPA)
Lebanese people drive a vehicle loaded with mattresses as they return to their village in the town of Nabatieh, southern Lebanon, 23 June 2026, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. (EPA)
TT

Hundreds of Thousands of Lebanese Head Home as Fighting Eases, Many Still Stranded

Lebanese people drive a vehicle loaded with mattresses as they return to their village in the town of Nabatieh, southern Lebanon, 23 June 2026, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. (EPA)
Lebanese people drive a vehicle loaded with mattresses as they return to their village in the town of Nabatieh, southern Lebanon, 23 June 2026, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. (EPA)

Some 400,000 Lebanese uprooted by war have returned to southern Lebanon, with more expected to follow in the coming week, a government minister said on Tuesday, encouraged by a lull in the four-month-long conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

Yet many remain unable to go back. Since March, around 1 million people have been forced to flee their homes, and large numbers are still in shelters or temporary housing because their homes are destroyed or uninhabitable, said Hanine ‌El Sayed, Minister of Social Affairs.

Roughly 40% ‌of those displaced have now returned to their towns ‌and ⁠villages. The number ⁠of people staying in collective shelters has fallen sharply, to about 13,000 from 37,000, she said.

While some shelters will remain open for families who cannot return, aid programs — including emergency cash support — will continue. The number of shelters has dropped from 692 at the height of the crisis to 479, with additional centers opened in Nabatieh for those wanting to stay near their home ⁠areas.

El Sayed said the headline figures conceal a ‌gap between those able to return and ‌those still displaced.

"These are families that are able to return to something, at least ‌the basic minimum," she told Reuters. "The fact that the others have ‌not returned means they have a much harder situation."

Authorities expect further returns in the coming days and hope within about a week to better gauge how many families cannot go back at all.

"In about a week's time ... we would really know ‌the size of the problem - how many absolutely cannot return because their homes have been totally damaged," she said.

CHALLENGES ⁠OF GOING ⁠HOME

For many, returning home does not mean a return to normal life. Families are often finding damaged houses, scarce electricity and water, and destroyed businesses and livelihoods, as the government works to restore basic services and expand cash assistance, rental support and employment programs.

Yet despite these hardships, many are choosing to return.

"Many of the people of the south are very attached to their land and they want to rightfully make a claim back to it," El Sayed said.

The government estimates Lebanon will need billions of dollars to rebuild damaged homes and infrastructure, funding that it does not currently have, El Sayed said.

Nearly 90,000 housing units have been totally or partially destroyed in the latest conflict, adding to widespread damage from earlier fighting.


Aoun Optimistic on ‘Best Possible’ Deal for Lebanon, Banks on US Role

In this photo, released by the Lebanese Presidency press office, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, right, shakes hands with Adm. Brad Cooper, the top US military commander in the Middle East, at the presidential place in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, Monday, June 29, 2026. (Lebanese Presidency press office via AP)
In this photo, released by the Lebanese Presidency press office, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, right, shakes hands with Adm. Brad Cooper, the top US military commander in the Middle East, at the presidential place in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, Monday, June 29, 2026. (Lebanese Presidency press office via AP)
TT

Aoun Optimistic on ‘Best Possible’ Deal for Lebanon, Banks on US Role

In this photo, released by the Lebanese Presidency press office, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, right, shakes hands with Adm. Brad Cooper, the top US military commander in the Middle East, at the presidential place in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, Monday, June 29, 2026. (Lebanese Presidency press office via AP)
In this photo, released by the Lebanese Presidency press office, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, right, shakes hands with Adm. Brad Cooper, the top US military commander in the Middle East, at the presidential place in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, Monday, June 29, 2026. (Lebanese Presidency press office via AP)

In one phrase, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun answers critics of the framework agreement Lebanon and Israel signed late last week, an agreement he admits is “not ideal”, “Give me the alternative.”

For more than three years, Lebanon has been reeling from the fallout of Hezbollah’s successive “support” wars, first for Gaza in late 2023 and then for Iran on March 2 in wake of the war with the United States and Israel. Still, visitors to Aoun come away with a clear impression that the president is optimistic about the path opened by the agreement.

A senior Lebanese source said the reality created by those wars has added to Lebanon’s burden. Beirut had been negotiating over Israel’s withdrawal from five hills it occupied in the first round.

It then found itself negotiating under fire and occupation, as Israel’s presence expanded to the outskirts of Nabatieh in the east and Tyre on the coast, seizing Bint Jbeil in between.

The source placed direct responsibility for the war on Hezbollah. “Had it not been for its six rockets, which it fired last March, we would not be in this position today,” the source said.

The agreement is the result of facts imposed by the battlefield and by Lebanon’s condition as it buckles under rising human and material losses, with no clear path to a solution, it added.

A framework, not yet an agreement

Still, the source insisted the agreement “is not bad. More precisely, it has not become an agreement yet. It is a framework agreement that sets broad guidelines, pending the fine details that will be negotiated gradually.”

Lebanon is betting on the new US momentum to press Israel into making concessions on those details, it continued.

The clearest sign that the agreement is not bad, according to the source, “was Israel’s fierce rejection of it at first. That rejection would not have turned into approval without the major US pressure applied in the final hours before signing.”

The second sign was how quickly Israeli leaders moved to craft their own version of the agreement, “which has nothing to do with the truth,” the source said.

“Ninety percent of what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said is not true,” it stressed.

An Israeli military vehicle maneuvers on the Lebanese side of the Israel-Lebanon border, as seen from the Upper Galilee, 28 June 2026, amid an Israel-Lebanon ceasefire. (EPA)

US support

Lebanon sees clear US support as its best weapon against Israel’s lack of interest in a solution and its tilt toward constant escalation.

The strongest proof, Lebanese officials believe, is that US President Donald Trump has called Aoun twice so far. Both calls were highly positive, as were calls from other US officials who contacted Aoun more than once, including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who remained in continuous contact with him.

The source asked: Can Lebanon afford to risk losing US support when everyone knows the Americans are the only party able to exert real pressure on Israel?

The source said Trump, in his latest call with Aoun, was very clear in adopting Lebanon’s demands for a full Israeli withdrawal “despite the disruptions.”

Trump also expressed readiness to help revive Lebanon and put it back on track. That track includes the return of displaced people, reconstruction, and extending state authority through its own forces across all Lebanese territory, a Lebanese demand above anyone else’s.

The Doha cell and a Hezbollah representative

The Americans are closely tracking developments in Lebanon.

Although Washington is separating what is being agreed on in the Pakistan with Iran track from the Lebanese-Israeli track, it is working in parallel on the Lebanese file. That includes setting up the cell provided for in the US-Iranian understanding to monitor the ceasefire in Lebanon.

The source said the committee would operate from a liaison point in the Qatari capital, Doha. It would include representatives of the United States, Lebanon, Qatar and Iran, as well as Hezbollah, likely the group’s representative in Tehran.

A satellite image shows the village of Froun in Lebanon, June 24, 2026. (Pléiades Neo © Airbus DS 2026/Handout via Reuters)

Ali al-Taher

When practical negotiations over the withdrawal began, Aoun proposed starting with an Israeli pullback from Kfar Tibnit and the historic Beaufort Castle, the last point reached by Israeli forces in their advance. The aim was to push Israeli forces away from Nabatieh after they had reached the city’s outskirts.

But the proposal collided with Israel’s determination to reach the Ali al-Taher heights, believed to contain a massive underground Hezbollah military facility.

Aoun called Rubio and proposed that the Lebanese army enter the area, while the Israeli army would withdraw beyond the Litani River. Rubio contacted the Israelis. Aoun, through intermediaries, contacted Hezbollah.

Israel approved the proposal. Hezbollah gave two contradictory answers. The first allowed the army to deploy without entering the facility. The second rejected the idea completely.

Later, Hezbollah settled on one answer: the matter was absolutely unacceptable. The proposal collapsed.

The area’s importance goes beyond Hezbollah’s facility. If Israeli forces position themselves there, they would directly overlook Nabatieh. From the other side, the heights overlook Israeli settlements, especially Metula, just a few kilometers from Nabatieh.

The idea of a withdrawal from that area was shelved. Instead, the focus shifted to another pullback from Zawtar al-Gharbieh and to the launch of a “pilot zone” there and the towns of Froun and Ghandourieh in the central sector.

That was the middle-ground solution. A withdrawal from the coastal line falls under the same equation because of its proximity to the southern border and, therefore, its high sensitivity for Israel.