Israel to Help US Manage Strait of Hormuz Crisis Through Intelligence

Israel to Help US Manage Strait of Hormuz Crisis Through Intelligence
TT

Israel to Help US Manage Strait of Hormuz Crisis Through Intelligence

Israel to Help US Manage Strait of Hormuz Crisis Through Intelligence

Israel is helping the United States manage the crisis around the Strait of Hormuz through intelligence, a senior Israeli security official told the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper on Monday, without addressing the issue of an Israeli involvement in any possible ground operations in Iran.

The official said the Israeli army had been tasked with creating conditions that could enable the fall of the regime and that Israel was “very close” to achieving the objectives it had set for itself in Iran, with assessments of the campaign’s gains being updated constantly.

“Israel is helping the United States manage the crisis around the Strait of Hormuz, primarily through intelligence,” the senior security official said.

He noted that the Israeli strikes on Iranian steel plants earlier this week had caused damage worth billions of dollars and had become a major preoccupation for Tehran.

The remarks came after Israeli sources affirmed that Tel Aviv supports a ground military operation in Iran, but that its troops are not expected to join.

Last Sunday, US Central Command chief Adm. Brad Cooper was in Israel and met with Israeli Army Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir and other top Israeli generals. According to Channel 12, they discussed US-Israeli coordination in the war on Iran, as well as efforts to stop Iranian weapons production.

Israel wants to continue the war and is pushing for a ground operation in Iran. However, it fears surprises from US President Donald Trump, who could still declare a temporary ceasefire.

On Monday, Yedioth Ahronoth said the assessment in Israel is that a ground operation could create a chance to break Iranian resistance or force a surrender.

Meanwhile, it wrote, preparations are underway in Pakistan for possible US-Iran negotiations, and there is also growing attention to the possibility that Washington could announce a ceasefire as early as this week to allow talks to proceed.

The newspaper said that although Trump has warned Tehran to reopen the strategic waterway or face broader US attacks on Iranian energy infrastructure, his comments are contradictory with reports saying US is on advanced talks with Iran.

Control Iran’s Oil

Last Sunday, Trump said he could “take the oil in Iran” and seize Iran’s export hub of Kharg Island.

In an interview with the Financial Times, the US President said his “preference would be to take the oil,” comparing it with the US military operation in Venezuela earlier this year.

An Israeli source cited by Channel 12 last week said that ending the war without removing Iran's enriched uranium stockpile is considered akin to “leaving smoldering embers” and a failure to address the core threat.

The source added that Israel is not willing to end the war now before reaching an absolute victory after eliminating Iran's missile and nuclear capabilities.

Researcher Udi Dekel of the Institute for National Security Studies wrote on Monday that since October 7, Israel has been trapped in a conception of “absolute security” that drives it toward continuous war.

“If security is defined as the complete removal of every threat already in its earliest stages of emergence, and even more so when it is clear and tangible—rather than its reduction or the construction of a stabilizing political framework—then almost any other outcome of conflict will be perceived as insufficient, any arrangement as surrender, and any achievement as partial and therefore a failure,” he said.

Dekel considered that Israel faces two traps: a ceasefire without an effective settlement mechanism linked to a war-termination mechanism regarding the nuclear issue and ballistic missiles, which would leave it needing a continuous follow-up campaign and repeated rounds of strikes, and a “war of attrition” with no exit point.

Mechanism for Cooperation with Washington

According to Dekel, in order to leverage the military success against Iran into a strategic achievement—blocking Iran’s path to rebuilding its nuclear and missile capabilities, and ensuring regional stability—a mechanism for cooperation with the United States and moderate Arab states is required.

Its purpose would be to advance four overlapping interests: weakening the regional radical camp and significantly reducing the Iranian threat; maintaining the US military presence in the region; expanding security cooperation with the United States and regional states; and promoting regional stability while preserving freedom of navigation, which is vital for economic development and strengthening the moderate camp.

The researcher offered possible scenarios for ending the war, including a termination mechanism based on understandings between the United States and the surviving regime in Iran in exchange for reopening the Strait of Hormuz and ensuring freedom of navigation, alongside continued negotiations on arrangements concerning the nuclear issue and missiles.

A dangerous scenario, he said, would be a prolonged attrition of Iran and internal destabilization that lead to broader regional chaos.

Dekel said the end of the war will not mean the end of the conflict. In conclusion, he wrote, Israel may find itself in a situation of operational victory against Iran alongside strategic failure.

Doubling Interceptor Missile Production

On Monday, Haaretz wrote that Israel's arms industry has ramped up production of interceptor missiles and other munitions in response to the country's continued wars on Iran and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.

According to the report, Israel brought in massive stockpiles of munitions since last June. Its initial operational planning assumed the active, heavy-fire phase would last only about three weeks.

But as the war intensifies, Haaretz’ military correspondent Amos Harel, wrote that the Israeli defense industry has recently tripled the pace at which it produces interceptor missiles and other aerial munitions, in an attempt to respond to the army's needs during the war.

Production is expected to increase to four times the usual rate and continue through the Jewish holiday of Pesach, he said.

Meanwhile, US military cargo planes continue to deliver munitions to Israel as over 200 aircraft and ships have arrived in Israel carrying approximately 8,000 tons of military equipment, weaponry, and munitions since the start of the war.

 



EU to Invite Taliban Officials to Brussels for Migrant Return Talks

Around 20 EU countries are exploring how to return migrants -- particularly those with court convictions -- to Afghanistan. NICOLAS TUCAT / AFP
Around 20 EU countries are exploring how to return migrants -- particularly those with court convictions -- to Afghanistan. NICOLAS TUCAT / AFP
TT

EU to Invite Taliban Officials to Brussels for Migrant Return Talks

Around 20 EU countries are exploring how to return migrants -- particularly those with court convictions -- to Afghanistan. NICOLAS TUCAT / AFP
Around 20 EU countries are exploring how to return migrants -- particularly those with court convictions -- to Afghanistan. NICOLAS TUCAT / AFP

The European Commission told AFP Monday it plans to invite Taliban officials to Brussels in the near future for talks on returning migrants to Afghanistan.

According to sources close to the matter, a letter is to be sent "imminently" to Kabul to arrange a date for a meeting in the Belgian capital.

The visit, coordinated with Sweden, would follow two trips by European officials to Afghanistan on the same issue.

Officials are now "working on a potential follow-up meeting at technical level in Brussels with the de-facto authorities in Afghanistan," a spokesperson for the EU executive said.

No specific date has yet been raised for the visit.

- Letter from 20 countries -

As part of a broader tightening of immigration policies, around 20 EU countries are exploring how to return migrants -- particularly those with criminal convictions -- to Afghanistan.

In an October letter, several urged the EU to find diplomatic and practical ways to move the issue forward.

"In this context a technical meeting took place in Kabul in January 2026," the commission spokesperson said, adding that the EU was now working jointly with Sweden to "pursue these discussions" in Brussels.

Such visits raise a host of practical and ethical questions, not least because they involve engaging with Taliban authorities, which are not formally recognized by the European Union.

To enter Belgium, which hosts the EU institutions, Taliban officials would need to be granted exemptions -- something Belgian authorities appear, in theory, prepared to do.

Beyond the practicalities, the European push on returns comes as Afghanistan confronts a severe humanitarian crisis.

Since 2023, more than five million Afghans have returned from Iran and Pakistan, often forcibly. According to international organizations, most of them live in extreme hardship, without stable housing or employment.

- Germany leads charge -

EU countries received about a million asylum applications filed by Afghans between 2013 and 2024, according to the bloc's data agency. About half as many were approved over the period.

In 2025, Afghans still -- by far -- accounted for the largest share of asylum applicants in the EU.

But as the public mood has soured on migration, Europe has looked to scale back its welcome -- and started discussing how to send Afghan migrants back home.

Some countries have pushed ahead, with Germany deporting more than 100 Afghans with criminal convictions since 2024, via charter flights facilitated by Qatar.

Attitudes in the country have been hardened by a string of deadly attacks by Afghans in recent years, including a car-ramming in Munich last year.

Austria has followed suit, receiving a delegation of Taliban representatives in Vienna in mid-September.

A number of other EU member states, including Belgium and Sweden, are looking to emulate their example, with enthusiastic backing from migration hawks.

The returns drive has drawn sharp criticism from NGOs and the political left.

"Deporting Afghans back to a country where almost half of the population cannot feed themselves is not a migration policy; it is a decision that could cost lives," says Lisa Owen, the International Rescue Committee's country director for Afghanistan.

Other migrant rights groups fear that a visit to Brussels could allow Taliban officials to identify individuals they want returned to Afghanistan, potentially putting their fundamental rights at risk.

Several diplomatic sources contacted by AFP counter that the visit is first and foremost intended to resolve practical issues -- such as how to issue passports to people whose embassies in Europe are not recognized by the Taliban authorities.

During their trips to Afghanistan, European officials similarly looked into the handling capacity of Kabul airport and other technical details, according to sources close to the talks.


UK Sanctions 12 Iran-Linked People, Entities

An Iranian man walks past an anti-US and anti-Israel mural painted on a wall, in the capital Tehran on May 10, 2026. (AFP)
An Iranian man walks past an anti-US and anti-Israel mural painted on a wall, in the capital Tehran on May 10, 2026. (AFP)
TT

UK Sanctions 12 Iran-Linked People, Entities

An Iranian man walks past an anti-US and anti-Israel mural painted on a wall, in the capital Tehran on May 10, 2026. (AFP)
An Iranian man walks past an anti-US and anti-Israel mural painted on a wall, in the capital Tehran on May 10, 2026. (AFP)

Britain on Monday slapped sanctions on a dozen Iran-linked individuals and entities accused of involvement in "hostile activities" by Tehran targeting the UK or other countries.

Updating its official sanctions list, the Foreign Office in London imposed the UK travel bans and asset freezes on nine people, two shadow banking exchange houses and the allegedly criminal Zindashti network.

The UK government had already sanctioned its alleged leader, Naji Ibrahim Sharifi-Zindashti, in 2024 alongside the United States, labelling him the head of international drug and trafficking cartel.

The European Union sanctioned his network last year, with London, Washington and Brussels all claiming it is connected to Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security and accusing it of conducting assassination and kidnapping operations against Tehran's critics.

The latest UK curbs follow a string of attacks over recent months against the Jewish community in Britain, and repeated warnings from officials that hostile states are intent on using proxies for such purposes.

Zindashti's nephew, Turkish national Ekrem Abdulkerym Oztunc, was among the nine people sanctioned Monday by Britain.

London also targeted five members of the Zarringhalam family -- Farhad, Fazlolah, Mansour, Nasser and Pouria -- said to have helped finance efforts to "destabilize" the UK.

Mansour, Nasser and Fazlolah Zarringhalam were sanctioned by the US last year for their involvement in Iran's "shadow banking" network.

The US Treasury said the trio had "collectively laundered billions of dollars" for Iran through a network of front companies in the United Arab Emirates and Hong Kong.

London also added Berelian Exchange and GCM Exchange, two US-sanctioned Iran-based exchange houses linked to them, to its sanctions list.

Iranians Nihat Abdul Kadir Asan and Reza Hamidiravari, and Azerbaijani national Namiq Salifov, were the other three individuals hit with the British travel bans and asset freezes.


Tens of Millions Risk Hunger as Hormuz Standoff Blocks Fertilizer, UN Official Says

An aerial view shows Jerry Fuerstenau planting a farm field on May 06, 2026 near West Bend, Iowa. (Getty Images/AFP)
An aerial view shows Jerry Fuerstenau planting a farm field on May 06, 2026 near West Bend, Iowa. (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Tens of Millions Risk Hunger as Hormuz Standoff Blocks Fertilizer, UN Official Says

An aerial view shows Jerry Fuerstenau planting a farm field on May 06, 2026 near West Bend, Iowa. (Getty Images/AFP)
An aerial view shows Jerry Fuerstenau planting a farm field on May 06, 2026 near West Bend, Iowa. (Getty Images/AFP)

Tens of millions of people could face hunger and starvation if fertilizers are not soon allowed through the Strait of Hormuz, the head of a UN task force aimed at averting a looming humanitarian crisis told AFP on Monday.

Iran has had the strategic waterway -- through which a third of the world's fertilizers normally pass -- in a chokehold for months in retaliation for the war launched by the United States and Israel on February 28, disrupting a trade critical for farmers around the world in a race against the end of planting seasons.

"We have a few weeks ahead of us to prevent what will likely be a massive humanitarian crisis," Jorge Moreira da Silva, executive director of the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) and leader of the task force, told AFP in an interview in Paris.

"We may witness a crisis that will force 45 million more people into hunger and starvation."

The UN secretary general created the task force in March to spearhead a mechanism to allow fertilizers and related raw materials such as ammonia, sulphur and urea through the strait.

For weeks, Moreira da Silva has been working to convince the belligerent parties to allow even a few ships through, and has met with "more than 100 countries" to rally UN member state support around the mechanism.

While the ultimate hope is for a "lasting peace" deal in the region and "freedom of navigation for all commodities" through the strait, "the problem is the planting season can't wait", Moreira da Silva said, with some ending in African nations within weeks.

Global focus has been on the economic impacts of the throttled oil and gas trade, but the United Nations has been sounding the alarm of the threat the blockade poses to the world's food security, with countries in Africa and Asia likely to be particularly hard hit.

- 'Political will' -

Moreira da Silva said the United Nations could have the mechanism up and running in seven days but even if the strait were to reopen now, it would take three to four months to return to normality.

"It's just a matter of time. If we don't stop the origin of the crisis soon, we will have to deal with the consequences through humanitarian aid."

While food prices have not exploded yet, Moreira da Silva said, there has been a "massive increase" in fertilizer costs, which experts say would likely lead to a drop in agriculture productivity and send food prices soaring.

Moreira da Silva said moving just an average of five vessels a day of fertilizers and related raw materials through the strait would head off the crisis for farmers.

What's missing, he said, is "the political will".

"We can't procrastinate on what is possible to do, and what is urgent to do -- which is let the fertilizers cross the strait and, through that, minimize the risk of massive food insecurity at the global level."