Report: Multi-Level Partnerships a Safeguard for Gulf Security

Gulf leaders in a group photo during the Gulf Cooperation Council summit in Kuwait in 2024 (SPA).
Gulf leaders in a group photo during the Gulf Cooperation Council summit in Kuwait in 2024 (SPA).
TT

Report: Multi-Level Partnerships a Safeguard for Gulf Security

Gulf leaders in a group photo during the Gulf Cooperation Council summit in Kuwait in 2024 (SPA).
Gulf leaders in a group photo during the Gulf Cooperation Council summit in Kuwait in 2024 (SPA).

A recent analytical report says Gulf states are well positioned to play a larger role in shaping the regional security architecture in the aftermath of the war against Iran by adopting a multi-level security approach that combines greater self-reliance with broader international partnerships.

The report, prepared by Ambassador Alessandro Minuto-Rizzo, President of the NATO Defense College Foundation and former Deputy Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), was published by the Gulf Research Center in Jeddah. It says partnership with NATO represents an important avenue for developing Gulf defense capabilities, offering opportunities to benefit from the alliance's accumulated military and operational expertise while enhancing strategic dialogue and exchanges in the fields of security and defense.

Multi-Level Approach

Minuto-Rizzo argues that the next phase will require Gulf states to adopt a multi-level security strategy based on diversifying partnerships and strengthening self-reliance, while maintaining strategic ties with the United States and expanding engagement with Europe and NATO.

He says Gulf countries handled the war against Iran with considerable political prudence, seeking to avoid being drawn into military confrontation despite coming under attack and sustaining direct damage. He notes that Gulf states have in recent years continued a policy of diplomatic opening toward Tehran.

The President of the NATO Defense College Foundation points to the restoration of Saudi-Iranian relations through Chinese mediation and notes that Gulf states sought to de-escalate tensions following the outbreak of the war while strengthening contacts with potential security partners such as Pakistan, Egypt and Türkiye.

In his report, published in Views on the Gulf, a journal of the Gulf Research Center, he argues that the Gulf states' decision not to respond directly with military force to Iranian attacks was not a sign of weakness. Rather, it reflected a deep political understanding of the risks of widening the conflict and turning it into a full-scale regional war with consequences that could prove difficult to contain.

A Saudi Royal Air Defense Forces company during a graduation ceremony at Fort Bliss, United States (Ministry of Defense).

The US Role in the Region

According to Minuto-Rizzo, the United States remains the cornerstone of Gulf security despite growing debate over the past two decades about the nature of Washington's role in the region. In this context, he recalls discussions within NATO at the beginning of the century, in which he participated, regarding the Gulf's importance as a strategic partner, stressing that the region has remained firmly on Washington's security agenda.

At the same time, he says the recent war exposed the limits of some traditional assumptions about deterrence. He argues that one reason for the shortcomings exposed by the crisis was the United States' decision to enter a war against Iran that proved more complex than initially anticipated.

Nevertheless, the ambassador does not expect any significant reduction in the US presence in the Gulf given the region's strategic importance, although US-Israeli relations could see more visible divergences on certain issues in the future.

US sailors watch a US Marine Corps F-35B stealth fighter land (CENTCOM).

Lessons Learned

The President of the NATO Defense College Foundation believes one of the key lessons of the war is the need to establish clear political and strategic objectives before engaging in any military confrontation. He warns against underestimating Iran as a regional power that will remain an influential actor regardless of the war's outcome.

As for the future of regional security, the former NATO official argues that a multi-level security approach represents the most realistic option for Gulf states, particularly if members of the Gulf Cooperation Council succeed in strengthening security and military integration.

"Security partnerships do not fully align in terms of objectives and interests, but diversifying them helps build a stronger safety net capable of addressing challenges," he says.

Smoke rises above the UAE emirate of Fujairah after earlier Iranian strikes (AFP).

Minuto-Rizzo argues that NATO provides an advanced institutional framework for security cooperation that goes beyond traditional bilateral relationships, citing the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative as a mechanism that offers broad opportunities for training, coordination and capacity-building between the alliance and Gulf countries.

He says renewing partnership with NATO could open significant opportunities for Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia, to benefit from the alliance's accumulated military and operational expertise while also enhancing strategic dialogue and consultation between military and political leaders, helping anticipate crises and prevent their escalation.

Minuto-Rizzo also stresses the importance of strengthening Europe's presence in the Gulf, arguing that Europe can make a meaningful contribution to regional security and stability through balanced partnerships based on shared interests rather than purely military considerations.

The President of the NATO Defense College Foundation concludes that the most important message for Arab states is the need to take control of their strategic decision-making and overcome divisions that have weakened the region for decades. Building a stable security architecture, he says, requires combining self-reliance with diversified international partnerships in a way that ensures balance and stability in a region that continues to face complex and constantly evolving challenges.

Two US AH-64 Apache attack helicopters fly over the Strait of Hormuz (CENTCOM).



SABIC, Rongsheng Petrochemical Sign PDA for Potential Strategic Investment in Advanced Materials Project in China

The SABIC headquarters in Al-Jubail (SABIC website)
The SABIC headquarters in Al-Jubail (SABIC website)
TT

SABIC, Rongsheng Petrochemical Sign PDA for Potential Strategic Investment in Advanced Materials Project in China

The SABIC headquarters in Al-Jubail (SABIC website)
The SABIC headquarters in Al-Jubail (SABIC website)

The Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC) signed on Thursday a Project Development Agreement (PDA) with Rongsheng Petrochemical Co. Ltd. and its wholly owned subsidiary Rongsheng New Materials (Zhoushan) Co. Ltd. to jointly advance the development of the Jintang New Materials Project in Zhoushan, China.

“Under the PDA, SABIC and Rongsheng Petrochemical are evaluating a potential equity investment by SABIC up to 50% of Rongsheng New Materials, positioning the project as a strategic collaboration between two leading global petrochemical companies,” the Saudi company said in a statement said.

The agreement also establishes a framework for project development activities towards a potential final investment decision (FID), the statement added.

SABIC CEO and Executive Board Member Dr. Faisal M. Alfaqeer said that the partnership with Rongsheng Petrochemical reflects SABIC’s vision for global footprint expansion.

“SABIC continues to prioritize innovation, portfolio advancement and sustainable value creation, strengthening its ability to serve customers worldwide,” he added.

CEO of Rongsheng Petrochemical and Executive Director of the Board Mr. Xiang Jiongjiong said: “The collaboration represents a landmark partnership and a model of win-win cooperation between Rongsheng Petrochemical and SABIC.”

He described the partnership as “a flagship outcome of two industry leaders complementing their strengths and robust capabilities to jointly research, develop and operate in advanced chemical materials.”

He said the alliance “also serves as a critical stabilizing anchor for the chemical sector, enabling us to deliver more valuable and comprehensive product solutions to our customers.”

The Jintang New Materials Project is designed to enhance production capabilities for advanced chemical materials and support growing demand from key downstream industries in China and Asia.

The project is expected to leverage world-class technologies, integrated manufacturing capabilities and operational excellence to strengthen competitiveness, foster innovation and create long-term value for all stakeholders.


Saudi Ports Authority Signs Seven Agreements Worth Over $266 Million to Develop Logistics Centers

A container terminal at one of Saudi Arabia's ports. (SPA)
A container terminal at one of Saudi Arabia's ports. (SPA)
TT

Saudi Ports Authority Signs Seven Agreements Worth Over $266 Million to Develop Logistics Centers

A container terminal at one of Saudi Arabia's ports. (SPA)
A container terminal at one of Saudi Arabia's ports. (SPA)

The Saudi Ports Authority (Mawani) has signed seven agreements to establish logistics centers in Jeddah, western Saudi Arabia, with a total value exceeding SAR 1 billion ($266 million).

The signing ceremony was attended by Minister of Transport and Logistic Services Saleh Al-Jasser and Mawani President Suliman Al-Mazroua.

Al-Mazroua said the new agreements provide for the development of logistics centers under concession terms of up to 25 years, supporting efforts to position Jeddah as a global logistics hub. He noted that two agreements were signed with international companies, while five were awarded to Saudi firms with global ambitions. Valued at more than SAR 1 billion, the projects are also expected to create additional jobs.

He said that in February, at the onset of the Strait of Hormuz crisis, the Minister issued urgent directives to prepare the Kingdom's western coast to receive supply chains serving Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region. As a result, all entities involved in the logistics ecosystem worked toward that objective.

Al-Mazroua said Mawani focused on several key areas. The first was strengthening maritime connectivity by increasing shipping services to compensate for the shortfall affecting the Kingdom's eastern region.

During the crisis, more than 27 additional shipping services were introduced on the western coast, increasing capacity by more than 200,000 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) per month to offset the shortfall.

He added that the second area focused on preparing ports to handle higher volumes by streamlining procedures with the Saudi Customs Authority and terminal operators, while expanding equipment capacity. Investments in these measures exceeded SAR 640 million over a three-month period.


Oil Eases as Traders Weigh US-Iran Conflict Risks

A horse grazes near an oil drilling rig in Kazakhstan (Reuters)
A horse grazes near an oil drilling rig in Kazakhstan (Reuters)
TT

Oil Eases as Traders Weigh US-Iran Conflict Risks

A horse grazes near an oil drilling rig in Kazakhstan (Reuters)
A horse grazes near an oil drilling rig in Kazakhstan (Reuters)

Oil prices eased on Thursday as traders weighed escalating tensions between the United States and Iran and the risks to oil supplies moving through the Strait of Hormuz.

Brent crude futures were down 27 cents, or 0.32%, to $84.68 a barrel at 1011 GMT, while US West Texas Intermediate futures were down 11 cents, or 0.14%, to $79.49 a barrel. Both contracts remain close to one-month highs.

"The market is still reacting with a surprising degree of calmness," said Ole Hvalbye, market analyst at SEB Research, Reuters reported.

"It seems reasonable that prices could continue to climb towards $90-$95 and maybe even touch the $100 mark again and that is because the Strait of Hormuz is repeatedly being disrupted, creating uncertainty over oil flows from the Gulf."

The US struck Iran's coastal defences and missile sites on Wednesday after reimposing a naval blockade of its ports, while Tehran threatened to shut off more regional energy exports, saying it was engaged in an "existential war" with America.

The escalation comes after a fragile truce reached in June collapsed, reviving fears of a return to full-scale conflict and disrupting energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz, which handled about a fifth of daily global oil and LNG trade before the war began.

Fewer vessels passed through the strait on Wednesday, the first day after the US reimposed its naval blockade on Iran. Seven crossed on Wednesday, down from 13 the previous day.

"Markets could remain cautious as they assess immediate supply risks. So far, despite heightened military tensions, oil tankers continue to sail through the Strait of Hormuz, although in more limited numbers," said Wael Makarem, financial markets strategist lead at Exness.

Iran said on Thursday the strait was an inviolable "red line", warning that if US President Donald Trump carried out his threat to attack Iran's infrastructure, it would strike all infrastructure across the Gulf region.

Analysts say Iran has signalled it may use its Houthi allies in Yemen to shut the Bab el-Mandeb gateway to the Red Sea, opening a new front against Washington and putting a second of the world's most vital energy arteries at risk.

Oxford Economics said the likeliest scenario was that low, fluctuating levels of traffic through the strait spark intermittent oil price rallies that keep average prices above $80 per barrel for several quarters.

Elsewhere, Ukraine's Security Service said on Thursday that together with Ukraine's navy it has struck two Russian "shadow fleet" tankers with naval drones in the Black Sea.