BDL Acting Governor: I Will Not Use People’s Deposits to Lend to the State

Wassim Mansouri, Acting Governor of Lebanon’s Central Bank (BDL), speaks during a press conference. (AP)
Wassim Mansouri, Acting Governor of Lebanon’s Central Bank (BDL), speaks during a press conference. (AP)
TT

BDL Acting Governor: I Will Not Use People’s Deposits to Lend to the State

Wassim Mansouri, Acting Governor of Lebanon’s Central Bank (BDL), speaks during a press conference. (AP)
Wassim Mansouri, Acting Governor of Lebanon’s Central Bank (BDL), speaks during a press conference. (AP)

It may not be fair to compare the 30 years that the former Governor of the Banque du Liban (BDL), Riad Salameh, spent in managing the country’s financial policy, with the 30 days that his deputy, Wassim Mansouri, spent in the post.

The Lebanese political forces announced their inability to appoint a successor for Salameh, who faces judicial procedures in Lebanon and Europe, as well as US sanctions, all of which pertain to his management of financial files.

But Mansouri, who came to the world of finance from a legal background, quickly began to “eradicate” the financial policies of the former governor.

He was faced with the test of controlling the exchange rate of the lira against the dollar, which seemed to have succeeded to a significant extent, with a remarkable note related to the transparency of the numbers that began to appear in the bank’s semi-monthly statements.

Contrary to warnings that the Lebanese currency would sharply collapse after Salameh’s departure, Mansouri was able to control the exchange rate. But this success is temporary and needs to be supported by governmental and parliamentary measures that contribute to restoring balance to the state’s public finances.

Mansouri is currently working on completing a new, “more transparent” platform for currency transfer. Many are optimistic about the external response to his policies, the most expressive of which is the return of many correspondent banks to dealing with the BDL, including Citibank and Morgan Stanley.

Mansouri's first measures were against the Lebanese state, which was initially scooping money from the BDL, then from its cash reserves belonging to depositors in Lebanese banks, which caused a major financial collapse in late 2019 from which the country has not emerged until today.

In the first press conference, which Mansouri held a day before the end of Salameh’s term, he said that he was ready to give the state a grace period, so as not to cut off funding for it permanently. He proposed providing the state with its last loan for 3 or 6 months, within a defined mechanism. However, the government and political forces failed to issue the relevant laws, pushing the acting governor to resort to an alternative plan.

This month, the central bank paid public sector salaries in dollars by purchasing dollars from the market with Lebanese pounds transferred by the government for this purpose. Thus, the BDL did not print additional money, nor was it later forced to withdraw reserve funds to restore calm to the market, as was happening previously.

The idea was to cover the deficit, on the basis of giving the government time to obtain funds from the IMF or any other source suggested by the state, while the BDL ensured financial order in exchange for securing reform laws and guarantees for the depositor.

But Mansouri asserted that as long as all these demands are not met, he would not lend to anyone.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that there was absolutely no return to the time of state funding, “because I am seeking to restore order to the state’s finances.”

“This decision is crucial and not easy, but I will not back down from it,” he said.

He went further by stressing that even if a law on borrowing was passed in Parliament, and there were no reform laws in return for it, “I will not release the money.”

“No law obliges me to pay,” he said. “There is a law that allows me to use people’s deposits to lend to the state, but... I refuse to use it for a simple reason because if it is not accompanied by reforms, it will be thrown into the air.”

In fact, it is not possible to restore order to the state’s finances without relying on external sources of financing. The problem is that in the past, the state relied on BDL funds in foreign currencies to cover the budget deficit.

The biggest problem is that the size of the credit was so large that it depleted the central bank’s hard currency reserves, reaching the people’s deposits.

The state’s general budget for 2023, up to this point, has come out with a declared deficit of LBP 46 trillion, or $500 million. Mansouri believes that the deficit will exceed this amount.

The acting governor’s visitors quote him as saying that this deficit must be covered, within the framework of a new law and a reform program with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Cash economy and its risks:

Since the beginning of the crisis and the freezing of depositors’ funds in banks, the Lebanese people have lost confidence in this sector and moved towards a cash economy that involves many risks.

Mansouri told Asharq Al-Awsat: “The cash economy that the country is experiencing cannot and must not continue. The central bank cannot keep buying dollars from the market indefinitely. It must verify all of its sources. In the end, the cash economy will destroy the country. We need help. But if we don’t help ourselves, who will help us?”

In an attempt to get out of this crisis, the BDL issued Circular No. 165, which allowed the opening of “fresh” accounts in dollars and pounds, to transfer the parallel market to the banking sector, allowing the bank to monitor and confirm the source of funds in the country and activate anti-money laundering procedures.

But if no radical legal solutions are implemented to allow the banking sector to work effectively, it will remain hostage to the cash economy.

All matters are interconnected. Mansouri said: “If reform laws are implemented and state finances are regulated, the depositors will know how and when they will receive their money. Thus, confidence in the banks will be restored, which will encourage people to return part of their money to the banks, allowing the central bank, as a regulator of the banking sector, to set stronger regulations to limit the cash economy.”

Foreign Relations

Mansouri underlined that Lebanon cannot thrive and develop without relations with its Arab and Gulf surroundings.

He tells his visitors: “Friendly countries call on us to find a political solution, and they will support us. This file is not in my hands, but it is my duty to call on them to implement the laws related to currency and reforms to rebuild the economy... I think that if this sector is rebuilt, the rest will be solved.”

New platform

Among Mansouri’s various policies is the suspension of work on the Sayrafa platform, and the implementation of a new transparent mechanism, in cooperation with Bloomberg.

The new trading platform will be an item at Wednesday's Cabinet meeting for approval.

The acting governor confirmed that from a monetary standpoint and the size of the monetary mass in lira, it can be said that the exchange rate is controlled in the foreseeable future.

“As long as I control the monetary supply at the central bank, there is no fear of a fluctuation in the dollar exchange rate,” he remarked.

Mansouri’s measures to control the currency began with refraining from “excessive buying of dollars from the market, in exchange for reducing the size of the monetary supply,” which decreased from LBP 80 trillion to LBP 60 trillion on the first of August (about half a billion dollars).

The BDL also asked banks not to disburse more than LBP 50 billion per day to their customers. As for the Ministry of Finance, it does not pump liras into the market before coordinating with the central bank, noting that the minister has collected about LBP 20 trillion liras in August, including more than LBP 11 trillion in cash.

But can the government manage its affairs with the amount secured by the BDL? Mansouri replied: “Here lies the big question. If we don’t achieve reforms, we cannot maintain this situation with students returning to school and the supply of dollars in the market declining.”

He stressed, however, that the monetary situation was controlled on scientific foundations.

“What I use are traditional monetary means that do not cost the central bank a single cent, and perhaps this makes a big difference compared to what was happening before,” he noted.

In response to accusations thrown at Mansouri and the rest of the governor’s deputies, about their involvement in Salameh’s previous policies, he said that the deliberations of the BDL’s Central Council members clearly show that they were protesting against much of the spending taking place. But the law gives the governor executive authority. Thus, lending to the state continued despite their disapproval of the policies.



Qassem's Threat of Civil War Widely Condemned in Lebanon

Hezbollah's then deputy leader Sheikh Naim Qassem speaks during an interview with The Associated Press in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon, July 2, 2024. (AP)
Hezbollah's then deputy leader Sheikh Naim Qassem speaks during an interview with The Associated Press in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon, July 2, 2024. (AP)
TT

Qassem's Threat of Civil War Widely Condemned in Lebanon

Hezbollah's then deputy leader Sheikh Naim Qassem speaks during an interview with The Associated Press in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon, July 2, 2024. (AP)
Hezbollah's then deputy leader Sheikh Naim Qassem speaks during an interview with The Associated Press in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon, July 2, 2024. (AP)

Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem's continued refusal to lay down his party's weapons in defiance of the state have sparked outrage in Lebanon.

In a televised address on Saturday, Qassem declared that Hezbollah "will not surrender", accusing Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi of "undermining civil peace and inciting strife." He also called on the government to replace the minister.

Ministerial sources close to the presidency told Asharq Al-Awsat that some of Qassem's remarks were viewed as a response to President Joseph Aoun's recent statements in which he indirectly called on the Iran-backed party to "return to reason and the state and hand over its weapons that have become a burden on its community and Lebanon."

The sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that official "decisions were taken to be implemented. Nothing will change the president's convictions."

Qassem escalated his rhetoric to save face in front of Hezbollah supporters, they added, ruling out the possibility that the party would take its objections to the streets.

The process of imposing state monopoly over arms is on the right path, they stressed.

Meanwhile, officials expressed their outrage over Qassem's remarks.

In a post on the X platform, Justice Minister Adel Nassar said: "Those threatening civil war to preserve their weapons must cease giving lectures about patriotism to a minister in government."

Lebanese Forces MP Razi al-Hajj slammed Hezbollah as a "calamity" on Lebanon. In a post on X, he said: "Naim Qassem is working outside the state, manipulating civil peace, inciting strife and standing against the presidency, government and will of the Lebanese people."

"He refuses to hand over Hezbollah's weapons and makes threats of civil war. Day and night he attacks the Lebanese state's official positions and works against them. Hezbollah is Lebanon's real calamity," he remarked.

LF MP Ghayath Yazbeck slammed Qassem for "verbally" and "morally" assaulting LF ministers, "in complete disregard of ethical principles".

He warned that Qassem’s remarks may be a prelude to the assassination of the ministers and "the assassination of the Lebanese state."

"Our ministers represent dignity, sovereignty and the state," he stressed. Indirectly addressing Qassem, he said: "Act smart. Your predecessors made these mistakes and ended up in history’s trash bin. Haven’t you learned anything?"

Responding to Qassem, Kataeb MP Nadim Gemayel said: "The foreign minister's stance is based on the humiliating agreement that you signed after the 'support war'. Lebanon officially agreed to the deal that effectively embodies the president's swearing in oath and government's policy statement in terms of imposing state monopoly over arms across the country."

In a post on X, he hoped the president and prime minister would issue a clear stance in support of FM Raggi.

Addressing Qassem, LF MP Elias Hankach said on X: "By continuing to rebel against state decisions and threaten the Lebanese people, you have become an outlaw gang."

"Just as the army imposed state monopoly over arms south of the Litani River, it will soon do so to its north," he said.

MP Waddah Sadek slammed Qassem, saying on X: "He himself does not believe what he is saying... He is living in a parallel world while the state continues to firmly reclaim its institutions regardless of the critics."

"The only thing Qassem got right was that Lebanon has indeed entered a new phase," he noted. Addressing the Hezbollah leader, he added: "Your weapons are a burden and no longer serve a purpose."

"For years, we have listened to your speeches and endured defeats and destruction that you brought onto the country. Yours is just another speech that won't make a difference," he stated.

MP Fuad Makhzoumi expressed his rejection of Qassem's statements, saying he is "detached from reality" and posing a "frank challenge to the state and its institutions."

In a post on X, he wrote: "You are part of the government, so how can you object to decisions you were a partner to? Whoever objects to government decisions must resign, not defy the state from the inside."

He urged Hezbollah to commit to the ceasefire, United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, and hand over its weapons, otherwise face the responsibility of violating state decisions.

"No one is above the law in Lebanon and threats have only led to destruction that the Lebanese people alone have paid the price of," he added.


Palestinian President’s Advisor: Board of Peace, Related Entities Are a ‘Temporary Arrangement’

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ advisor Dr. Mahmoud Al-Habbash. WAFA
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ advisor Dr. Mahmoud Al-Habbash. WAFA
TT

Palestinian President’s Advisor: Board of Peace, Related Entities Are a ‘Temporary Arrangement’

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ advisor Dr. Mahmoud Al-Habbash. WAFA
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ advisor Dr. Mahmoud Al-Habbash. WAFA

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ advisor Dr. Mahmoud Al-Habbash said that the situation in the Gaza Strip, along with the formation of the Board of Peace and its related entities is not a Palestinian choice.

This is “a temporary arrangement (mandated by the UN Security Council) that the Palestinian leadership rejects under any circumstances... but it is the lesser of two evils,” Al-Habbash told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Speaking from Ramallah, Al-Habbash said that the Palestinian leadership “chose this arrangement to stop the massacre and open a potential window ... leading to a Palestinian state.”

US President Donald Trump announced last week the formation of the Board of Peace, a new body of world leaders meant to oversee next steps in Gaza.

The White House said there would be a main board, chaired by Trump himself, a Palestinian committee of technocrats meant to govern the war-wracked territory, and a second "executive board" that appears designed to have a more advisory role.

“Our clear and firm position is that we did not create this reality,” said Al-Habbash. “Rather, it is a reality imposed on us for two reasons: First, Israel’s aggression ... and second, the reckless adventure carried out by Hamas movement, which whetted Israel’s appetite to liquidate the Palestinian cause.”

According to Al-Habbash, “this transitional arrangement is the least harmful to the Palestinian cause,” because it ensures that Palestinians remain in the Gaza Strip and prevents displacement.


UN Human Rights Commissioner Calls for Accountability for Atrocity Crimes in Sudan

UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk 
UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk 
TT

UN Human Rights Commissioner Calls for Accountability for Atrocity Crimes in Sudan

UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk 
UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk 

UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk said on Sunday he is alarmed by the increasing militarization of society by all parties to the conflict in Sudan, also expressing his worries that the atrocity crimes committed during and after the takeover of El Fasher would be repeated in the Kordofan region.

Speaking at a press conference in Port Sudan, where the government had been operating as a temporary capital since the conflict began, the UN envoy said the proliferation of advanced military equipment, in particular drones, across Sudan has enhanced the military capabilities of both the Sudanese army (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), prolonging hostilities and deepening the crisis for civilians.

“I am deeply alarmed by the increasing militarization of society by all parties to the conflict, including through the arming of civilians and recruitment and use of children,” Turk noted.

The envoy said that during his visit to refugee camps in north Sudan, he heard accounts of widespread summary executions by RSF during the offensive on El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur region – for revenge, for suspected affiliation with the Sudanese Army or its allied Joint Forces.

He added, “I am very worried that the atrocity crimes committed during and after the takeover of El Fasher are at grave risk of repeating themselves in the Kordofan region, where the conflict has been rapidly escalating since late October.”

Horror and Hell

Turk also said the Sudanese population had endured “horror and hell,” especially with the expansion of the fighting in Kordofan.

“The Kordofan states are extremely volatile, with relentless military engagements, heavy shelling, drone bombardments and airstrikes causing widespread destruction and collapse of essential services,” he warned.

Since the end of October, and after taking control of El Fasher in Darfur, the RSF attacks have expanded into the neighboring Kordofan region, resulting in a continued displacement of civilians from the besieged city – all in the context of extreme food insecurity, with famine conditions confirmed in Kadugli, and risk of famine in other areas including Dilling, according to Turk.

The latest UN figures show that more than 65,000 people have been displaced since October.

At his press conference at Port Sudan airport, the envoy said that during his four-day visit to Port Sudan, Dongola, Ad Dabba and Merowe, he has met with those who have been hardest hit by brutal violence and injustice in this war.

“The terrifying experiences of these survivors must provoke action to end this conflict, and to make sure they can access what they need: medical care, psychosocial care, justice and support to pursue education and a livelihood”.

End This Madness

Turk and his UN team had visited the Al Afad site for internally displaced people (IDPs) in Ad Dabba, where they met with a large number of displaced people from the regions of Darfur and Kordofan.

“In my meetings with more than 50 local and international organizations in Dongola and Port Sudan, I heard appeals directed to those waging this war and the international community to end this madness,” he said.

“And to allow NGOs, journalists, lawyers and humanitarian actors to do their essential work without undue restrictions and reprisals,” Turk added.

He said the RSF and the Sudanese army must cease intolerable attacks against civilian objects that are indispensable to the civilian population, including markets, health facilities, schools and shelters.

“Attacks on critical civilian infrastructure are serious violations that can amount to war crimes,” Turk affirmed.

The UN envoy said the international community must ensure that the perpetrators of the horrific violations in Sudan face justice, regardless of their affiliation.

My Office, he said, is working to document and report on these violations and abuses to pave the way for accountability.

Turk described as “despicable” the fact that large sums of money are being spent on procuring increasingly advanced weaponry – funds he said that should be used to alleviate the suffering of the population.

Protection of Civilians

The envoy then called on all parties to the conflict to ensure the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure, to guarantee safe passage for civilians to leave areas of active conflict – including Kadugli and Dilling – and for humanitarian aid to enter where it is needed.

He also repeated his call from three years ago, when he last visited Sudan, urging all those involved to set aside entrenched positions, power games, and personal interests, and to focus on the common interests of the Sudanese people.

The envoy then left Sudan with a plea that human rights be central to building confidence and bringing this war to an end, to resuming the difficult task of building a sustainable peace.

“It is difficult, but certainly not impossible, with the resilience and power of the Sudanese people,” he affirmed.