US Plan for Gaza Force Faces Disagreements on Mission, Structure

Hamas fighters carry bodies after the group said it found the body of an Israeli soldier and was preparing to return it to Israel, in Gaza City. (Reuters)
Hamas fighters carry bodies after the group said it found the body of an Israeli soldier and was preparing to return it to Israel, in Gaza City. (Reuters)
TT

US Plan for Gaza Force Faces Disagreements on Mission, Structure

Hamas fighters carry bodies after the group said it found the body of an Israeli soldier and was preparing to return it to Israel, in Gaza City. (Reuters)
Hamas fighters carry bodies after the group said it found the body of an Israeli soldier and was preparing to return it to Israel, in Gaza City. (Reuters)

Regional and international reactions continued to pour in over a draft resolution the United States plans to present to the UN Security Council, calling for the creation of an international security force in the Gaza Strip for at least two years.

The proposal, aimed at stabilizing Gaza after years of conflict, has sparked disagreements among key powers and raised concerns that divisions could delay or derail its approval.

According to the US-based website Axios, Washington circulated the draft to several Security Council members on Monday. The text, described as “sensitive but not classified,” would authorize the United States and other participating countries to manage Gaza’s security and administration until the end of 2027, with an option to extend the mandate.

A US official told Axios that the force would be “executive rather than peacekeeping,” stressing that its primary task would be to secure Gaza, oversee disarmament, and dismantle or prevent the reconstruction of militant and military infrastructure.

The force would also seek the permanent disarmament of non-state armed groups in the territory.

Bishara Bahbah, a US-Palestinian mediator, told Asharq Al-Awsat earlier this week that there were four major points of contention among Security Council members regarding the composition and mission of the proposed force. These differences, he said, could make it difficult for the five permanent members - the US, Britain, France, Russia, and China - to reach agreement on the resolution.

A diplomatic source from a mediating country also told Asharq Al-Awsat that Washington might proceed to form the force independently if the Council fails to approve the measure, an approach favored by Israel but opposed by Arab mediators and guarantor states.

Under the draft plan, the international force would secure Gaza’s borders with Israel and Egypt, protect civilians and humanitarian corridors, and train a new Palestinian police force that would gradually assume responsibility during a transitional period.

Israel would, in turn, withdraw from additional parts of Gaza as the Palestinian Authority undertakes reforms to enable long-term governance of the territory.

The force is expected to include troops from several nations and operate under a unified command, in coordination with Egypt, Israel, and a proposed “Peace Council” for Gaza.

The Washington Post quoted a source as saying that Washington hopes to move swiftly, aiming to deploy the first contingent before the end of the year. The Trump administration reportedly views the establishment of such a force as a “critical step” toward post-war stabilization.

Diplomats said the text still requires clarification, particularly regarding the force’s rules of engagement and the specific areas of deployment. The draft mentions a role for Israeli security units in the disarmament process, but sets no clear timetable or benchmarks.

The resolution, which the US mission hopes to bring to a vote next week, does not invoke Chapter VII of the UN Charter - allowing the use of military force - but instead relies on Chapter VI, which governs peaceful settlement of disputes. This would make it similar to the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).

A Western diplomat told Asharq Al-Awsat: “We are committed to ensuring the rapid implementation of the second phase of President Trump’s plan. Consultations are ongoing with the US, European, and regional partners, but discussions remain inconclusive.”

Palestinian and Israeli officials have both expressed reservations.

Palestinian sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Palestinian Authority will consult with Arab states to seek amendments to the US draft. “We welcome the establishment of the force through the Security Council,” one official said, “but we want clearer terms regarding the mandate, duration, and the Authority’s role in enabling Palestinian governance.”

Israeli media, citing government sources, reported that while the draft leans toward Israeli preferences, Tel Aviv still opposes having the force created through a Security Council resolution.

Israel also objects to any Turkish participation, but might accept the inclusion of a Palestinian police unit.

Israeli officials believe that Indonesia, Pakistan, and Azerbaijan are likely to provide troops for the mission. Members of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee were recently briefed that soldiers from those countries - and possibly others - would form the initial composition of the proposed stabilization force.



Jordan Says Air Defenses Intercepted 18 out of 20 Missiles Launched from Iran

Projectiles streak across the sky in this screengrab taken from footage published by Iranian authorities purporting to show missiles launched at US military targets in Jordan from an unknown location, released on August 31, 2026. Wana News Agency via REUTERS
Projectiles streak across the sky in this screengrab taken from footage published by Iranian authorities purporting to show missiles launched at US military targets in Jordan from an unknown location, released on August 31, 2026. Wana News Agency via REUTERS
TT

Jordan Says Air Defenses Intercepted 18 out of 20 Missiles Launched from Iran

Projectiles streak across the sky in this screengrab taken from footage published by Iranian authorities purporting to show missiles launched at US military targets in Jordan from an unknown location, released on August 31, 2026. Wana News Agency via REUTERS
Projectiles streak across the sky in this screengrab taken from footage published by Iranian authorities purporting to show missiles launched at US military targets in Jordan from an unknown location, released on August 31, 2026. Wana News Agency via REUTERS

The Jordanian Army said in a statement on Wednesday that its air defenses intercepted 18 out of 20 ballistic missiles originating from Iran while two other missiles fell in a remote area confirming that there were no casualties.

The statement quoted the army’s official spokesman as saying that “Jordanian air defense systems had dealt with 20 ballistic missiles launched toward Jordanian territory from Iran. Eighteen of the missiles were successfully intercepted and destroyed, while two fell in areas away from populated areas”, he said, adding that there were no casualties.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard had earlier said that it fired ballistic missiles at a base in Jordan used by the US military and attacked 10 ships on Wednesday, after the US said it had destroyed five Iranian oil tankers, in a sharp escalation of the six-month-old war.

Iran has also threatened oil tankers in Kuwaiti and ‌Bahraini ports, according to a statement carried by state media.

IRNA quoted a message by Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as saying: “In light of the hostile actions being carried out by the terrorist US military, including its targeting of several oil tankers belonging to the Islamic Republic of Iran, we warn all crews of oil tankers in the vicinity of the ports of Kuwait and Bahrain, which host these terrorists and participate in their hostile actions, and urge them to leave their vessels immediately, whether they are in waiting areas or at the docks, as they will be subject to attack.”

US Central Command (CENTCOM) said it destroyed five Iranian crude oil tankers on Sept. 8 after Iran’s Revolutionary Guards twice targeted a US Navy warship with ballistic missiles. The warship evaded the attacks and continued its patrols without any US casualties.


Lebanese Contacts with Washington Curb Israeli Escalation in South

Mourners carry pictures of victims killed in an Israeli airstrike on Kafr Rumman in southern Lebanon during their funeral. (AP)
Mourners carry pictures of victims killed in an Israeli airstrike on Kafr Rumman in southern Lebanon during their funeral. (AP)
TT

Lebanese Contacts with Washington Curb Israeli Escalation in South

Mourners carry pictures of victims killed in an Israeli airstrike on Kafr Rumman in southern Lebanon during their funeral. (AP)
Mourners carry pictures of victims killed in an Israeli airstrike on Kafr Rumman in southern Lebanon during their funeral. (AP)

Intensive contacts between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and US officials helped curb Israeli attacks that had escalated since Saturday, as Lebanon awaits Washington’s confirmation of a date for an eighth round of negotiations with Israel, expected to be set this week and held later this month.

Israeli attacks in South Lebanon subsided on Tuesday after three days of airstrikes and artillery shelling that killed at least 28 people, wounded dozens and displaced hundreds from Nabatieh and surrounding villages. Residents began returning on Tuesday morning.

Unlike the heavy strikes on Saturday, Sunday and Monday, no Israeli airstrikes were reported by Tuesday afternoon, although drones flew over Beirut, its southern suburbs and other areas in the south.

Israeli forces carried out a demolition in the town of Mansouri, south of Tyre, while an Israeli unit entered the outskirts of Kfar Shouba overnight and raised an Israeli flag on a hill.

Intensive contacts

Ministerial sources close to the Lebanese presidency told Asharq Al-Awsat that Aoun had “conducted intensive contacts with the US side to press Israel to halt its military campaign,” adding that US officials had, in turn, contacted Israel.

The contacts included US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa, while Lebanon’s ambassador to Washington, Nada Hamadeh Moawad, also held talks with US officials aimed at containing the escalation in the south.

On Monday, Aoun warned that Israel’s attacks “will not bring security to civilians along the border” and were targeting the path of the “framework agreement” and undermining efforts to halt escalation in the south and across the region.

“The question today is: Does Israel want peace or war? If it wants war, let that be made clear,” he added.

Lebanon has little leverage to halt Israeli attacks other than through Washington, which it sees as the only available diplomatic channel capable of pressing Israel to cease fire and halt the growing bulldozing and demolition operations in South Lebanon.

Beirut expects a definitive answer from the US by the end of the week on the eighth negotiating session with Israel. Lebanon’s demands in the talks include a ceasefire, Israeli withdrawal from occupied Lebanese territory and the return of prisoners.

US ambassador visits Shiite council

Issa visited the Higher Islamic Shiite Council on Tuesday and met its vice president, Sheikh Ali al-Khatib.

Sources following the visit described it as part of Issa’s protocol meetings with Lebanon’s religious leaders, including Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdel Latif Derian and Druze spiritual leader Sheikh Sami Abi al-Muna over the past two weeks. Others pointed to its timing following al-Khatib’s meetings in Iran and Iraq.

After the meeting, Issa stressed that the United States wanted what was best for the Shiite community and for southerners to return to their land.

On Israeli attacks, Issa noted that his understanding from the Israeli side was that any fire directed at Israel would be met with a response 10 times greater.

Asked about prisoners, he replied that he will keep up his efforts until they are released, saying it was his responsibility.

Condemnation

Lebanese Minister of State for Administrative Reform Fadi Makki condemned the Israeli attacks after meeting Aoun, calling for intensified efforts to halt them and protect Lebanon.

He also stressed support for the Lebanese army and the need for all sides to rally around the state and its legitimate institutions to safeguard the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Israeli strikes on Lebanon have killed more than 4,300 people since Hezbollah fired rockets at Israel on March 2, two days after US and Israeli strikes on Iran began, prompting an Israeli air and ground offensive against Lebanon.

Lebanon’s Health Ministry reports that the dead include more than 250 children, around 400 women and more than 130 paramedics.

A ceasefire sharply reduced the violence, but Israeli forces occupying large parts of South Lebanon have continued destroying villages inside a unilaterally declared “security zone.” The Israeli military also continues to carry out strikes within the zone and north of it, often without issuing evacuation warnings.


Tunisian Journalists Protest Over Media Crackdown

Protesters chant against President Kais Saied, in Tunis, Tunisia, August 20, 2026, demanding the restoration of democracy and calling for the release of jailed activists and journalists amid a worsening economic and social crisis (Jihed Abidellaoui/Reuters)
Protesters chant against President Kais Saied, in Tunis, Tunisia, August 20, 2026, demanding the restoration of democracy and calling for the release of jailed activists and journalists amid a worsening economic and social crisis (Jihed Abidellaoui/Reuters)
TT

Tunisian Journalists Protest Over Media Crackdown

Protesters chant against President Kais Saied, in Tunis, Tunisia, August 20, 2026, demanding the restoration of democracy and calling for the release of jailed activists and journalists amid a worsening economic and social crisis (Jihed Abidellaoui/Reuters)
Protesters chant against President Kais Saied, in Tunis, Tunisia, August 20, 2026, demanding the restoration of democracy and calling for the release of jailed activists and journalists amid a worsening economic and social crisis (Jihed Abidellaoui/Reuters)

Tunisian journalists protested on Tuesday to demand the release of prominent journalist Mohamed Yousfi, whose arrest has become a new flashpoint amid accusations that President Kais Saied is cracking down on the country's ‌remaining independent voices.

 

The protesters, who also included activists, gathered outside a court where a judge was questioning Yousfi over illicit enrichment and money laundering charges, which critics say were fabricated to punish him for his outspoken journalism.

 

Yousfi, a fierce critic of Saied and the editor-in-chief of investigative news website ⁠Al-Qatiba, was arrested last Friday as he was preparing to enter Express FM Radio to take part in a radio program.

 

His arrest prompted widespread condemnation of Saied’s government, with rights groups saying the case was aimed at increasing a climate of fear among journalists.

 

“The situation is dark and difficult. Journalists who disturb the authorities are facing legal persecution and fabricated charges,” Zied Dabbar, the head of journalists' syndicate SNJT, told Reuters.

 

“Today journalists either end up in exile or in ‌prison... ⁠But we will resist,” he added.

 

Several media figures have been jailed this year, including Zied Heni, Mourad Zghidi and Borhen Bsaies, while Khaoula Boukrim was sentenced in absentia in June to four years.

 

Free speech initially flourished following the 2011 uprising that toppled Zine El Abidine ⁠Ben Ali and ignited pro-democracy protests known as the “Arab Spring.”

 

But critics say Saied's accumulation of power in 2021 and decrees he has issued since then have dismantled democratic safeguards ⁠and enabled the authorities to pursue many journalists.

 

The leaders of Tunisia's main opposition parties have been jailed in the last three years, along with dozens of ⁠politicians, activists, journalists and businessmen, on charges of conspiring against state security, of money laundering and corruption.

 

Saied says he will not be a dictator and that freedoms are guaranteed in Tunisia.