Lebanon’s Drug Empire Faces Beginning of Its End

A Saudi Anti-Narcotics official displays bags of Captagon pills seized in Jeddah hidden inside a shipment of pomegranates, April 25 (AFP)
A Saudi Anti-Narcotics official displays bags of Captagon pills seized in Jeddah hidden inside a shipment of pomegranates, April 25 (AFP)
TT

Lebanon’s Drug Empire Faces Beginning of Its End

A Saudi Anti-Narcotics official displays bags of Captagon pills seized in Jeddah hidden inside a shipment of pomegranates, April 25 (AFP)
A Saudi Anti-Narcotics official displays bags of Captagon pills seized in Jeddah hidden inside a shipment of pomegranates, April 25 (AFP)

A sense of optimism is growing within Lebanon’s security establishment that 2026 could mark the end of the country’s “drug world,” a shadow economy born out of the Lebanese civil war and fueled by the conflicts that followed.

Those wars created an ideal environment for the trade to flourish, turning Lebanon and Syria into hubs for narcotics trafficking that spread across borders through Jordan and into the Gulf, particularly Saudi Arabia.

The Kingdom is a main target of traffickers who moved their illicit goods along smuggling routes known as “tracks,” amassing fortunes that went on to finance states and militias.

This optimism stems from major developments along the Lebanese-Syrian border following the fall of the previous Syrian regime and the withdrawal of the army’s elite Fourth Division, which had long maintained control there.

The departure of that force led to the expulsion of drug traffickers who had operated from what security officials called the “gray zone” inside Syrian territory.

A senior Lebanese security official told Asharq Al-Awsat that the war in Syria had been “the spark that ignited the drug trade,” while the war’s end has signaled “the beginning of its demise,” after coordinated operations struck the trade at every level, from production and storage to distribution.

The border areas on the Syrian side had served as a safe haven for drug traffickers between 2023 and 2024. Many had settled in villages, buying houses under the protection of Syrian security forces, particularly the Fourth Division, which acted as their commercial partner. With the regime’s collapse, the traffickers fled back to Lebanon, where they became easy prey for the Lebanese army. Military intelligence units pursued them relentlessly — arresting some, killing others.

Development as a Weapon

According to Lebanese security assessments, a lasting end to the drug trade will require not only security pressure but also “a dose of development” in Lebanon’s deprived regions, mainly the Bekaa Valley and Akkar.

Officials say development projects must complement the army’s and security forces’ relentless crackdowns by addressing the deep poverty that traffickers have long exploited to justify their activities and recruit locals.

For decades, the smuggling routes that run through these neglected areas have shaped livelihoods. Some traffickers built reputations as “Robin Hoods,” showering locals with gifts and grants in exchange for silence and loyalty. But their generosity comes at a price.

A Lebanese security source told Asharq Al-Awsat that one well-known drug lord, for example, had paid the tuition fees of several university students — only to later turn them into campus distributors.

The Boom Years and the Rise of ‘Robin Hood’

Before the Syrian crisis, Lebanon’s drug trade was estimated at around 1.3 million pills. That figure surged to three million during the war, before dropping to about 400,000.

“They were outlaws who rose to power — and we turned them back into outlaws,” a Lebanese security official said.

The “golden age” of drug traffickers in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley returned after the country’s financial collapse in late 2019, which coincided with a crippling political paralysis following the end of former President Michel Aoun’s term and delays in electing his successor.

Traffickers seized on the despair of impoverished locals in regions long neglected by the state, especially in areas where chronic deprivation had persisted well before the currency crash. Residents say political leaders’ neglect had become a way of life.

Many young men fell into the grip of the trade, especially after the rise of the “new star” of the drug world — Captagon — which flooded Lebanon as both a manufactured and exported product after 2011, directly linked to the Syrian conflict.

Syrian traffickers and influential figures in government and security circles on both sides of the porous Lebanese-Syrian border played key roles.

The major dealers soon gained social, and at times political, influence. Some ran for or considered running in elections. Others portrayed themselves as benevolent outlaws, “Robin Hoods” who took from the rich and gave to the poor.

They funded irrigation and electricity projects, offered social assistance, mediated legal troubles for locals, and used their connections with politicians to secure jobs.

In effect, their mini-state kept expanding and benefiting from overlaps with powerful groups operating on both sides of the border.

The equation was simple: export drugs to the “enemy camp” to earn foreign currency, while the lucrative commissions from this trade helped finance a state — or a quasi-state.

As one trafficker boasted, “I only need one shipment out of ten to make it through — and I’m set.”

The Captagon Story

Captagon is often described as a “revolution” in the drug world. Unlike cannabis or opium, it needs no farmland. It is not bound by seasons, and its production, packaging, and smuggling are easy to conceal, often escaping traditional detection methods used by scanners and police dogs.

But while distribution and smuggling can be kept secret, production is harder to hide. Manufacturing Captagon requires specialized laboratories that emit strong, unpleasant odors during the process, making concealment difficult.

To overcome that, producers often lured powerful figures with money and convinced property owners in remote areas to rent out their buildings.

Traffickers also benefited from operating in what they called “the gray zone,” a loophole in countries that had not yet classified Captagon as an illegal narcotic, including Lebanon itself.

When security forces arrested traffickers, they often charged them with possessing other contraband items, such as weapons or different drugs, rather than Captagon itself.

The ‘Kings of the Tracks’ and the Secret Formulas

Captagon first spread in Iraq and Syria, where long-distance truck drivers used it to stay awake and alert during grueling journeys. By the early 2000s, it had gained recognition as a recreational drug. Between 2007 and 2011, a new class of traffickers emerged — the so-called “kings of the tracks” — who controlled the routes carrying Captagon from factories to consumers, particularly across the Gulf.

Production initially centered in border areas on the Syrian side. But as the Syrian conflict escalated, many traffickers relocated to Lebanon, setting up factories in partnership with local counterparts.

Interestingly, the Syrian traffickers guarded their manufacturing secrets closely, never sharing the exact formula with their Lebanese partners. Lebanese military intelligence — which spearheaded operations in the Bekaa Valley and border regions — later obtained confessions from captured dealers confirming this. Some Lebanese producers eventually discovered the formula, or came close enough to replicate it, leading to a surge in “knockoff” pills of lower quality.

The profits were enormous. A single pill costing less than 20 cents to make could sell for $20 — and up to $50 at retail prices. The huge margins drew new players into the trade.

When the war broke out in Syria, extremist groups took over border zones and destroyed the factories. Many traffickers fled to government-held areas or to Lebanon. But between 2012 and 2014, those same groups realized the profit potential and turned to Captagon as a major source of funding.

The years 2012 to 2023 marked the height of Captagon’s boom. Production and trafficking flourished, dominated by four or five top smugglers who monopolized the Gulf trade. Rivalries grew, with some traffickers roasting the pills to resemble desert sand, while others added logos and colors to give their products distinctive “brands.”

The Syrian Regime’s Entry — and Wagner’s Role

By mid-2012, influential figures within the Syrian regime had entered the Captagon trade. They did not take part directly in production or distribution but facilitated the movement of shipments across Syrian territory by issuing “permits” that allowed trucks to pass in exchange for fixed fees per crate.

At the time, Captagon traffickers traveled freely around the world, yet Beirut remained their favorite destination. Many opened restaurants and cafés in the Lebanese capital that served as perfect fronts for laundering drug money.

The production and distribution process followed several stages, starting with the purchase of raw materials.

Most materials were legally available on the market because they had legitimate uses in medicine, cleaning agents, pesticides, and fertilizers.

Traffickers bought them through supermarket owners or importers, paying premium prices to ensure cooperation. Even the machinery required for production was easy to acquire, as it was commonly used by pharmaceutical and chemical companies.

Most factories were based in Syrian border regions, but during the war, some were moved into Lebanon’s rugged mountains.

Remote houses, abandoned workshops, and livestock farms were rented at high prices and converted into makeshift labs. Some Syrian villages, such as Jarmash, became known as safe havens for dealers fleeing Lebanese security forces.

During the Syrian war, the trade thrived as never before. The Lebanese-Syrian and Syrian-Jordanian borders slipped out of government control, and despite the fighting, traffickers maintained good relations with all sides.

Everyone profited — from local militias to the Syrian regime, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah — all of whom were waging difficult battles and relied on the same smuggling routes used for narcotics to move weapons, equipment, and sometimes fighters into besieged areas.

Russia’s Wagner Group even established an air bridge to transport Captagon to Libya, charging around $5,000 per crate.

Between 2014 and 2020, many traffickers relocated to Lebanon, exploiting the turmoil in border areas seized by extremist factions and Lebanon’s own deep political divisions. With economic hardship spreading, more people turned to the trade, resulting in a flood of lower-quality products.

During that period, the Lebanese army’s grip on the border weakened, especially after it suffered losses and kidnappings at the hands of militant groups. Smugglers took advantage, carving out their own routes and, in some cases, buying influence in politics by financing or backing candidates in elections.

The Declaration of the War on Drugs

As Lebanon’s security situation began to stabilize and drug traffickers grew bolder, the Lebanese authorities declared war on narcotics.

In the Bekaa Valley and along the Syrian border, the Lebanese army took the lead, while the Internal Security Forces assumed responsibility for operations inside the country and at ports.

Army intelligence spearheaded the campaign in the Bekaa, raiding Captagon factories and dismantling production lines. But once-peaceful traffickers turned violent. Few raids ended without clashes between the army and drug gangs. The fugitives then retreated deep into the rugged mountain areas, where troops pursued them relentlessly.

A senior security official told Asharq Al-Awsat that traffickers had offered large bribes to officers and anti-narcotics officials to halt operations, especially after the first year of confrontations inflicted losses estimated at around $200 million.

To evade army raids, traffickers shifted to using mobile labs mounted on trucks that could be moved quickly between sites. Yet the design had a fatal flaw: once production began, the trucks became slow and vulnerable to detection.

The War on Kingpins and the Battle of Abu Sallah

Lebanon’s war on drugs soon evolved into a war on the kingpins themselves. The army began targeting major gang leaders, even carrying out drone and airstrikes against some of them.

One of the most dramatic operations was the raid targeting the country’s most notorious drug lord in the Bekaa Valley, known as Abu Sallah, whose real name is Ali Mounzer Zeaiter. The raid sent a clear message to the underworld, forcing many traffickers to disappear under mounting security pressure.

Zeaiter earned the nickname Abu Sallah early in his career, when he would lower a basket tied to a rope from his apartment balcony to collect cash and deliver drugs to customers — a primitive system that became his signature. Operating from Beirut’s eastern suburbs, he later built a vast network and amassed enough power to command what security sources described as a small private army of gunmen and dealers.

When army intelligence planned to capture him, they discovered he had set up 346 surveillance points to protect himself, a mix of cameras mounted on poles and disguised “express cafés” along every road leading to his residence, designed to alert him to any approaching force.

After eight months of planning, the army launched the operation during a dinner Abu Sallah was hosting for his associates. Intelligence officers managed to take control of some surveillance cameras and redirect them away from the target area. The head of army intelligence in the Bekaa even helped create a diversion by taking his wife to a restaurant in Beirut known to be monitored by Abu Sallah’s informants.

The operation was conducted under strict secrecy and only seven people knew of the plan. The target was code-named “Marlboro” to prevent any leaks.

Abu Sallah escaped the ambush by using his wife as a human shield, killing a soldier, and fleeing toward Syria. He later returned after the regime’s collapse, only to be tracked down by the army, which killed him in an airstrike on his vehicle.

According to Lebanese security assessments, Abu Sallah had been the country’s number one trafficker. He had extensive influence in universities and schools — his prime retail markets — where he paid tuition fees for students or enrolled his own associates to promote drugs among their peers.



Israel Faces New Era of Sinking US Support After Election

Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump appears on a congratulatory billboard for the 2024 US Presidential Election, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 6, 2024. (Reuters)
Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump appears on a congratulatory billboard for the 2024 US Presidential Election, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 6, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Israel Faces New Era of Sinking US Support After Election

Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump appears on a congratulatory billboard for the 2024 US Presidential Election, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 6, 2024. (Reuters)
Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump appears on a congratulatory billboard for the 2024 US Presidential Election, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 6, 2024. (Reuters)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's brash campaign posters are still up on Israeli public buses -- images of him, US President Donald Trump and soaring warjets that laud the two leaders attacking Iran together.

Neither is now advertising the state of the two countries' alliance.

A week after an inconclusive election for Netanyahu, Americans overwhelmingly rejected Trump and chose a Congress led by Democrats who want a tougher approach to Israel, whether on Iran, Gaza or settler violence in the occupied West Bank.

The back-to-back elections look to many observers like a turning point, with Israel no longer able to take for granted the cover of the world's most powerful country.

"This is a new era. The confluence of the Gaza war and the war with Iran have really changed how mainstream Americans -- not people particularly concerned with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- see Israel," said Yael Sternhell, an expert on the United States at Tel Aviv University.

Vice President JD Vance, assessing why his Republicans fared poorly, listed four ways to bring voters back, including ending the Iran war and changing "our relationship with Israel".

Trump did not disagree. Just as voting was underway Tuesday, Trump said he had agreed with Netanyahu to end the $3.8 billion in annual US military aid to Israel by the end of this year, explicitly tying the decision to the US political mood.

Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister who has served on and off for nearly two decades, had eagerly sought Trump's endorsement but also acknowledged his country's growing isolation.

In the final days of the campaign, he suggested Israel turn to cryptocurrencies to circumvent international sanctions he expected would intensify.

Netanyahu has not commented on the US election or Trump's aid remarks.

Amit Segal, a journalist known for his proximity to Netanyahu, posted that the political situation in the United States marked a "catastrophe" for Israel.

- Can Eisenkot restore the alliance? -

Opposition contender Gadi Eisenkot, who is trying to cobble together a coalition to oust Netanyahu, has cast himself as capable of repairing relations.

In an English-language statement, the former military chief said he believed in "liberal values" and also wanted to work "closely and constructively" with Trump.

Yair Golan, the main left-wing leader inside Eisenkot's bloc, called for Israel to restore a bipartisan approach destroyed by Netanyahu who he said promoted a "destructive Israeli narrative of eternal war and authoritarian rule".

Netanyahu boasted in his campaign about standing up to Democratic presidents including Barack Obama, who remains a hero for many Democrats. Netanyahu openly aligned with Republicans a decade ago to attack Obama's diplomacy on Iran.

"Netanyahu certainly rubs Democrats the wrong way and has made every effort to alienate them," Sternhell said.

"But Eisenkot can't just be a nicer man to receive a softer approach from this new Congress," she added. "He's going to need new policies."

She said Eisenkot would likely enjoy Israeli public support for cracking down on extremist settlers, who have attacked Palestinians in the West Bank with virtual impunity.

But Israel has shifted to the right, with wide initial support for the Gaza war.

- Broadening criticism of Israel -

The new Congress will include progressive Democrats such as Abdul El-Sayed, the first Muslim elected to the Senate, who describe the devastation in Gaza as genocide, an assertion rejected by Israel.

Netanyahu "made a bet not only on the Republicans but almost personally on Trump", said Eli Kowaz, senior policy director of the Economic Cooperation Foundation, an Israeli think tank that backs a two-state solution with the Palestinians.

"These results show that bet had an expiry date," Kowaz said. "Also, for the first time, really, I think there's a realization that it isn't only about the Democrats. It's a problem with the relationship with America."

Without US assistance, Israel still has its own major arms industry and retains a clear edge fighting non-state actors such as Hamas and Hezbollah, said Ehud Eilam, a former researcher for the Israeli defense ministry.

But he said Israel would need to rely more on cheaper artillery or non-sophisticated bombs, further increasing risks of civilian casualties that have enraged international opinion.

"Israel can adjust to a new strategic reality of losing much and even all US military aid, but it will be tough for Israel. It will require Israel to consider hard choices such as taking huge loans or raising taxes," Eilam said.

Kowaz said that Eisenkot, aware of politics in Washington, was trying to show he is interested in regional stability and strategic agreements and not just "an indefinite state of war".

"He is definitely laying out a different vision for Israel's relationship with the United States."


Trump Could Woo North Korea After Midterm Setback, but Kim May Not Respond

US President Donald Trump meets with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at the demilitarized zone separating the two Koreas, in Panmunjom, South Korea, June 30, 2019. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump meets with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at the demilitarized zone separating the two Koreas, in Panmunjom, South Korea, June 30, 2019. (Reuters)
TT

Trump Could Woo North Korea After Midterm Setback, but Kim May Not Respond

US President Donald Trump meets with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at the demilitarized zone separating the two Koreas, in Panmunjom, South Korea, June 30, 2019. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump meets with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at the demilitarized zone separating the two Koreas, in Panmunjom, South Korea, June 30, 2019. (Reuters)

The rebuke President Donald Trump suffered in the US midterm elections could prompt him to step up efforts to re-engage North Korea, but any willingness to make major concessions risks creating friction with regional allies.

Analysts and officials in Asia expect Trump to focus on foreign policy as he seeks to build his legacy in the final two years of his term. With efforts to resolve the wars in Ukraine and Iran yet to produce breakthroughs, he is likely to turn to Asia, where he believes he has room to maneuver.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, with whom Trump has been eager to restart talks, is likely to be a key part of that effort, they say.

"Trump is likely to devote significant effort to achieving foreign policy successes, especially if he faces greater constraints on the domestic front," said Ban Kil-joo, international relations professor at the Korea National Diplomatic Academy in Seoul.

"Given Trump would want a successor to win in 2028, there is a strong possibility that engagement with North Korea would be part of that agenda," he ‌said.

But there is ‌little incentive at the moment for Kim to respond, analysts say.

Asked about Trump's plans for diplomacy with North ‌Korea, the White ⁠House said Trump ⁠has restored American strength on the global stage and strengthened ties with world leaders.

"His foreign policy decisions have never been motivated by politics," White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in emailed comments to Reuters.

"The Commander-in-Chief will always act in the best interest of the American people and our national security."

Trump met Kim three times during his first term after a war of words that raised fears of military conflict.

But their 2019 summit ended without agreement after they failed to reach a deal on North Korea's nuclear weapons program and sanctions relief.

Seven years later, the stakes are higher. North Korea has expanded its nuclear and missile arsenal, while Pyongyang's ties with Russia and China are the best in years, giving Kim less incentive to negotiate and potentially increasing pressure on Trump to offer concessions.

TRUMP CALLS KIM 'GREAT GUY'

Trump has touted his relationship with Kim, ⁠calling him a "great guy" and saying that they "get along very well."

Nonetheless, US and South Korean officials see ‌fading chances of a meeting this year, with Washington receiving no response from Pyongyang ahead of a regional ‌summit in China this month where they might have met.

Kim's influential sister, Kim Yo Jong, has said dialogue remains a path to peace, but Pyongyang sees no need ‌for talks now. She denounced what she called Washington's "hostile policy" while denying US accusations that North Korea stole more than $6 billion in virtual assets from Binance ‌last week.

Her brother has previously said he was open to talks if Washington stopped insisting his country give up nuclear weapons. Regional allies South Korea and Japan are opposed to any such concession.

"A summit that shelves denuclearization would undermine deterrence and create policy friction among Washington, Seoul and Tokyo," said Leif-Eric Easley, professor of international studies at Ewha Womans University in Seoul.

Officials in Japan and South Korea are concerned they could be "cut out of the loop" if Trump deals directly with Kim, with the quiet blessing of Beijing and Moscow, a ‌senior Japanese official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

"(Japanese officials) are concerned about the lengths he will go to get a summit with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, such as dropping the issue of denuclearization."

'BIGGEST CHANGE ⁠SINCE WORLD WAR TWO'

Trump has referred ⁠to North Korea as a nuclear power, a status that allies in the region and the West have refused to recognize despite the dozens of nuclear warheads Pyongyang is believed to have built and its stockpile of fissile material.

"If US-North Korea talks lead Washington to accept North Korea's nuclear status, the security environment in Asia would change dramatically," said Professor Kazuhiro Maeshima at Sophia University in Japan.

"The biggest change since World War Two could occur in the remaining two years of the Trump administration. It is a serious situation."

Kim now has a vastly more advanced arsenal than at the time of the 2018-2019 summits, including more weapons and missiles, hypersonic glide vehicles, a growing fleet of modern warships and submarines, and improved drone capabilities.

If Trump were to bring Kim back to the table, he might need to offer more than partial sanctions relief.

Such concessions could face hurdles at home from a Democratic-controlled Congress and Trump's limited time in office, said Moon Chung-in, a Yonsei University Professor in Seoul who served as a presidential adviser on national security.

"And what is important is North Korea's perception and calculation; if North Korea thinks that Trump has entered a lame-duck period and he cannot get the support from Congress... there's no reason for Kim Jong Un to come to dialogue," he said.

Former US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun, who led US negotiations with North Korea during Trump's first term, also said there were few incentives for Pyongyang currently.

"The North Koreans, I think, have very little upside to a meeting like this right now, and potentially some downside."


Is the MAGA Era Over?

President Donald Trump gestures while boarding Air Force One at Morristown Airport, Monday, Sept. 7, 2026, in Morristown, N.J. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
President Donald Trump gestures while boarding Air Force One at Morristown Airport, Monday, Sept. 7, 2026, in Morristown, N.J. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
TT

Is the MAGA Era Over?

President Donald Trump gestures while boarding Air Force One at Morristown Airport, Monday, Sept. 7, 2026, in Morristown, N.J. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
President Donald Trump gestures while boarding Air Force One at Morristown Airport, Monday, Sept. 7, 2026, in Morristown, N.J. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

Has MAGA fever finally begun to fade? Will the American right abandon the Make America Great Again slogan and Donald Trump's populist ideology in favor of a more traditional brand of conservatism?

Following a crushing defeat in midterm elections that revolved almost entirely around one man, many Republicans have begun questioning the party's future and what role, if any, Trump should play in shaping it.

The Wall Street Journal, whose editorial pages have long represented the establishment right, called for "soul-searching" and urged Republicans to move away from the ultranationalist, identity-driven rhetoric that helped return the 80-year-old Trump to power.

In an editorial titled "The Trump Reckoning Arrives," the newspaper argued that tariffs and mass deportations were no substitute for higher real incomes.

It added: "Playing to the bro MAGA base is no substitute for persuading Hispanics, independents and suburban swing voters who abandoned the party on Tuesday."

"Still Your President"

The White House, however, appeared far less inclined toward introspection.

Its first post on X on Wednesday featured a stern-looking Trump accompanied by the words "Trump is still your president," a reminder that he will remain in office until January 2029.

But the American political calendar never stands still. Wednesday also effectively marked the beginning of the 2028 presidential campaign, which will culminate in the election of Trump's successor.

The US Constitution bars Trump from seeking a third term.

There was no realistic scenario in which Trump could have emerged from the midterm elections in a stronger political position.

The scale of the Republican defeat on Tuesday night, which exceeded even some of the Democrats' most optimistic expectations, has accelerated the erosion of his political influence.

Eyes on 2028

Vice President JD Vance, widely regarded as a potential contender for the White House in 2028, was careful not to confront his boss directly.

In a lengthy, essay-like post on X on Wednesday, Vance wrote: "The reason we lost is the war."

He immediately added: "The president himself said so last night."

That was not entirely accurate. Trump had attributed the defeat partly to the war in the Middle East, while also arguing that Republicans had fielded weak candidates.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis described the outcome as an "extinction-level event" for the Republican Party, suggesting Republicans might have to wait until 2032 to regain control of Congress.

Republican lawmaker Don Bacon wrote on X that the party "needs to reclaim our Reagan principles."

He added: "Voters rejected populism, chaos, Putin and tariffs."

Former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a far-right figure who has turned against Trump, went further.

"If the GOP wants any chance in the future, it will have to kick Donald Trump out of the party," she said.

Matthew Boyle, a prominent figure at the far-right news outlet Breitbart, wrote on X that "Republicans need to get back to basics."

"No more endless wars," he said.

On the economy, which he identified as the top issue, Boyle called for policies that benefit ordinary Americans rather than special interests.

He also urged Republicans to "be sane with immigration enforcement."

Criticism Without Naming Trump

For now, however, criticism remains relatively muted. Only a handful of conservative figures, whether moderates or hardliners, have been willing to attack Trump by name.

After all, the Republican Party has tied its political fortunes almost entirely to Trump since 2016.

"The big question is, are some of these Republican leaders in the House and Senate going to distance themselves from Trump?" Amy Dacey, a former Democratic official who is now an expert at American University, told AFP.

The same question applies to far-right influencers whose prominence and financial success have been closely linked to Trump's popularity.

Dacey said a devastating electoral defeat could diminish their influence, but it would by no means eliminate those associated with the MAGA movement.

Some of MAGA's online supporters have already attempted to shift the blame elsewhere.

"Great work, neocons," Jack Posobiec wrote sarcastically on X, referring to the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, known for its interventionist foreign policy and hawkish stance toward Iran.

Nevertheless, it may only be a matter of time before the divisions become more pronounced.

Former congressman Bob Good wrote on the same platform: "Gotta start by acknowledging that Trump was and is the problem. Quietly whispering it won't do it."