Yemeni Government Calls on Immediate UN Intervention for Derelict Oil Tanker

Safer oil tanker, Getty Images
Safer oil tanker, Getty Images
TT

Yemeni Government Calls on Immediate UN Intervention for Derelict Oil Tanker

Safer oil tanker, Getty Images
Safer oil tanker, Getty Images

Yemen’s government has urged the UN Security Council to intervene to prevent a rundown oil tanker, Safer, from leaking more than a million barrels of oil into the Red Sea.

Foreign Minister Mohammed al-Hadhrami called on the UNSC to hold a special session following the Iran-backed Houthi militia’s refusal to allow UN experts to conduct their five-year maintenance on the ship.

Al-Hadhrami, in a letter, urged the Council to undertake its responsibilities to avoid an environmental catastrophe.

An oil leak from the Safer’s tanks would be “one of the biggest environmental disasters in the region and the world,” he told Christoph Heusgen, Germany’s Permanent Representative to the UN and President of UNSC.

The Houthis have rejected all independent international requests to board the vessel, including the latest one from UN Yemen envoy Martin Griffiths, who demanded access for an international technical team.

Al-Hadhrami, in his letter, briefed the UNSC about all government and international efforts, including the government approving a separate proposal to resolve the Safer oil tanker crisis presented recently by Griffiths.

Houthis have rejected the proposal.

Al-Hadhrami quoted previous government letters and statements to the UN which showcase the oil tanker’s deteriorating situation.

The tanker, which has been floating near the port city of Hodeidah since 1989 following an oil spill, is at risk of exploding and causing a massive environmental disaster.

Safer – often described by officials as a ticking time bomb – has not docked since 2014 and is currently in waters controlled by the Houthis.

The minister called on the Council to address the situation immediately and separate the issue from Yemen’s ongoing crisis.

An environmental catastrophe would pose a more immediate threat to Yemen and the region, he added.



British Ambassador to Baghdad: Iranian Interference is Extensive, Illegitimate

British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq (X)
British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq (X)
TT

British Ambassador to Baghdad: Iranian Interference is Extensive, Illegitimate

British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq (X)
British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq (X)

British Ambassador to Iraq Irfan Siddiq sharply criticized Iran-backed armed factions, accusing them of operating through intimidation and extortion in a mafia-like manner. He also revealed that one such group had taken control of a contract originally awarded to a British company operating in Iraq.

Siddiq’s connection to Iraq dates back to the aftermath of the 2003 US-led invasion, when he served as a political affairs official with the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad. During that time, he was involved in rebuilding Iraqi institutions and participated in the constitutional drafting process.

He later returned to Baghdad as Britain’s deputy ambassador between 2010 and 2011, during the drawdown of US forces. In 2025, he was appointed British ambassador to Iraq, with a focus on political and economic cooperation and regional stability.

British Company Loses Contract

In a televised interview aired Monday evening, Siddiq said an armed faction had pressured authorities and ultimately taken over a project from a British company holding a government services contract. He added that the Iraqi government’s silence over the incident had enabled armed groups to tighten their grip on the country’s economy.

The ambassador did not identify the British company involved. However, several major British firms have operated in Iraq in recent years, particularly in security and aviation services linked to Baghdad International Airport.

British security company G4S was responsible for airport protection and security services from 2010 until its contract expired in late 2022.

In December 2020, Tehran’s prosecutor accused G4S of involvement in the killing of Qassem Soleimani, the former commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force. Iranian authorities claimed the company had provided the US military in Iraq with information regarding the arrival time of the aircraft carrying Soleimani to Baghdad in January of that year.

Distinguishing the PMF from Armed Factions

The British diplomat sought to distinguish between the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) as a formal state institution and certain affiliated factions that, according to him, have not fully complied with directives issued by the PMF leadership and Iraq’s commander-in-chief.

He referred in particular to recent months, during which hundreds of rocket attacks targeted Iraqi, Gulf, and American sites.

Speaking about his discussions with PMF chairman Falih al-Fayadh, Siddiq said he told him the organization faced serious internal problems requiring reform and accountability. According to the ambassador, al-Fayadh agreed on the need to distance the PMF from armed factions operating within it.

There are rising concerns in Iraq that the PMF’s official structure effectively provides cover for factions engaged in violent activities under the umbrella of the so-called “Axis of Resistance.”

Siddiq said the United Kingdom has no objection to dealing with the PMF as a legitimate security institution, provided it remains fully under government control. He added that London would be willing to support reforms within the organization if requested, drawing on Britain’s experience in Northern Ireland.

At the same time, the ambassador argued that the original justification for maintaining the PMF in its current form had largely vanished following the defeat of ISIS. He questioned why international coalition forces that fought alongside the PMF against terrorism are now being portrayed as occupation forces, describing such claims as illogical.

He stressed that decisions concerning war and peace should remain exclusively in the hands of legitimate state institutions, emphasizing that only Iraq’s elected government has the authority to manage such matters.

“No Relations with Armed Factions”

During the interview, Siddiq repeatedly criticized armed factions and rejected describing them as the “Iraqi resistance.” He questioned whom these groups were resisting, who controlled the territories where they operated, and why they continued to exist.

Regarding the participation of militia-linked groups in government, Siddiq said Britain does not engage with what he described as “militia parties.” However, he noted that London respects Iraq’s political decisions regarding government formation and could reconsider its position in the future if those groups abandon their weapons and transition fully into political activity.

The ambassador also criticized what he described as extensive and illegitimate Iranian interference in Iraqi affairs. He called on the new government, led by Ali al-Zaidi, to strengthen state sovereignty and ensure that all weapons remain under state control.

Siddiq said Iran exerts significant influence over Iraqi affairs and accused Tehran of failing to respect Iraq’s sovereignty, describing the interference as both inappropriate and unlawful. He expressed hope that Iraq’s new government would address the issue.


Millions of Sudanese Mark Eid amid Displacement, Poverty and Hunger

Sacrificial sheep at a livestock market in Khartoum, where demand remains weak (SUNA)
Sacrificial sheep at a livestock market in Khartoum, where demand remains weak (SUNA)
TT

Millions of Sudanese Mark Eid amid Displacement, Poverty and Hunger

Sacrificial sheep at a livestock market in Khartoum, where demand remains weak (SUNA)
Sacrificial sheep at a livestock market in Khartoum, where demand remains weak (SUNA)

The Sudanese mark Eid al-Adha this year as the war enters its fourth year, amid a harsh humanitarian and economic reality that has changed the face of the holiday and stripped it of many of the social meanings that had remained deeply rooted for decades.

In a country where holidays have long been associated with family gatherings, visits and invitations to share grilled sacrificial meat, millions of Sudanese are receiving Eid this year amid displacement, poverty, hunger and fear. Priorities have shifted from buying a sacrificial animal and children’s clothes to searching for food, medicine and drinking water.

Sudanese, often dressed in bright white clothes during Eid al-Adha, were accustomed to exchanging visits and invitations with neighbors, friends and relatives, and eating grilled meat in homes, neighborhoods and open squares. The practice was one of the most prominent social rituals linked to the occasion, alongside the exchange of meat and family visits.

But the war and economic collapse have greatly weakened those traditions, after large numbers of families became unable to buy sacrificial animals or even meet basic needs.

Refugees and displaced people appear to be suffering most during the holidays, after many lost their homes and sources of income and settled in camps and shelters that lack basic services. Those who remain in other cities and towns face a suffocating economic reality that consumes their limited incomes.

In displacement centers inside Sudan, Eid passes amid crowded tents and high temperatures, with shortages of food, water and healthcare, while diseases such as cholera, malaria and dengue fever spread in areas affected by the war.

“Children no longer ask about clothes or toys, but about food. Many of them do not even feel that there is an Eid,” said Amouna Ismail, a displaced woman from North Darfur who lives in a shelter in the city of Al Dabba.

In refugee camps in neighboring countries, the situation appears more complicated, with large numbers of Sudanese almost entirely dependent on humanitarian aid.

A refugee in one of the camps in Uganda, identified by her initials M.N., said she had not felt the joy of any Eid since fleeing Sudan.

“But what can we do? We are waiting for the war to stop and to return to our country,” she said. “I did not buy sheep for the sacrifice; I raised them at home.”

Umm Ahmed, who was displaced from Kordofan to Gedaref, said: “In the past, Eid was an occasion for joy and connection. Now people feel ashamed because they cannot do anything for their children or their displaced neighbors.”

Even outside areas of displacement and asylum, life remains difficult for many Sudanese who stayed in their cities and villages, amid sharp price increases, falling incomes and interruptions to basic services.

Hashim Moussa, a secondary school teacher, said his salary of 140,000 pounds is no longer enough to buy even one sack of sugar, whose price has exceeded 200,000 Sudanese pounds.

He said teachers had not received salaries or allowances, and that payments for exam monitoring had not been disbursed.

“How can a teacher bring joy to his children or buy clothes and food under these circumstances?” he asked.

Abdullah Mohammed Yusuf, 52, said the war had drained families’ savings and weakened returns from farming and work. His job as a tractor driver no longer provides enough income to cover living costs or buy an Eid sacrificial sheep, he said.

Khaled al-Tihami, a blacksmith, said repeated power cuts had directly affected his work and income. Farming has also become less viable due to water shortages, high fuel and seed costs, and seasonal pests, making it extremely difficult to buy a sacrificial animal this year.

Dr. Salah Jalal, spokesman for the Sudanese Group for Refugee Advocacy, said aid organizations and relief initiatives had worked to provide sacrificial animals in Sudanese refugee camps in eastern Chad, especially in Adre, Maji and Abu Tanqi, as well as refugee camps in South Sudan, Duweli camp and the Ugandan capital Kampala.

He said the initiatives aim to ease the suffering of families who have lost almost everything because of the war, especially during holidays when refugees and displaced people feel a deeper sense of isolation and loss.

He said the Turkish Red Crescent provided 100 bulls for Eid sacrifice to Sudanese refugees in the Kiryandongo camp in Uganda.

In recent years, the Eid sacrifice has no longer been only a religious rite. It has also become a social marker reflecting financial ability and family stability, especially in major cities. But the war and economic collapse have forced many families to abandon those rituals for the first time.

Livestock markets have been directly affected by the war, after large areas in Kordofan and Darfur, known for sheep production, were pushed out of normal activity because of fighting, insecurity and the difficulty of transporting livestock.

Livestock traders said the movement of sheep from Darfur and Kordofan to central and northern states had fallen sharply because of security risks, rising transport costs and restrictions on livestock movement, driving up prices in major cities.

Sheep prices in central and northern states range between 700,000 and 1.5 million Sudanese pounds, or about $150 to $300, sums beyond the reach of most families exhausted by war, inflation and the loss of income sources.

By contrast, prices in Darfur and Kordofan ranged between 250,000 and 300,000 Sudanese pounds because of stagnation, weak purchasing power and the difficulty of moving livestock to the rest of the country.

As the war continues and living conditions deteriorate, millions of Sudanese appear to be receiving another Eid weighed down by loss. The occasion is no longer tied to joy as much as it has become a daily reminder of the scale of the changes the war has imposed on people’s lives and society.

In another sign of the changes the war has imposed on social life, some Sudanese states have moved Eid al-Adha prayers inside mosques instead of the public squares where Sudanese had performed the prayers for decades.

In Sennar state, the state security committee approved a special Eid security plan that included instructions to hold prayers inside mosques, according to the official Sudan News Agency.

Sudanese say the absence of open-air Eid prayers this year reflects the scale of the changes the war has imposed on the details of daily life and public holiday rituals. Eid squares were once open spaces for social gatherings and exchanging greetings on the morning of Eid.


Netanyahu Seeks Alternatives to Control over Palestinian Antiquities

One of the historic Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem, which Israeli Finance Minister Bezalal Smotrich has vowed to take control of. (Bethlehem Municipality)
One of the historic Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem, which Israeli Finance Minister Bezalal Smotrich has vowed to take control of. (Bethlehem Municipality)
TT

Netanyahu Seeks Alternatives to Control over Palestinian Antiquities

One of the historic Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem, which Israeli Finance Minister Bezalal Smotrich has vowed to take control of. (Bethlehem Municipality)
One of the historic Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem, which Israeli Finance Minister Bezalal Smotrich has vowed to take control of. (Bethlehem Municipality)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered a comprehensive review of a controversial Antiquities Authority bill for the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and instructed Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs to look for “alternatives” to the draft law, which is now being debated by the Knesset Education Committee, after security and professional bodies warned of “serious international damage.”

Hebrew media outlets quoted Israeli sources on Tuesday as saying Netanyahu was effectively obstructing the bill because it threatens Israel’s foreign relations, making the chances of passing any version of it before the current Knesset is dissolved “slim.”

Netanyahu’s position followed warnings from legal and security officials against the law, which establishes a “civil heritage authority” in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The Knesset plenum approved the bill in its first reading this month. The legislation would give the Antiquities Authority, once established, absolute authority over archaeological sites in the occupied West Bank. The scope was later expanded to include the Gaza Strip.

Palestinian antiquities under an Israeli minister

The bill, submitted by Likud lawmaker Amit Halevi, whose party is led by Netanyahu, calls for establishing an “Antiquities Authority” under the responsibility of Israel’s “heritage minister.”

It would be “fully responsible for handling all heritage and antiquities affairs in the area,” with powers including land confiscation, archaeological excavations and their management, and law enforcement. The powers of the “archaeology officer” in the army’s Civil Administration would be transferred to it.

The Knesset Education and Culture Committee is discussing the bill to draft its final version and submit it for a second and third reading. During that process, disputes emerged and Netanyahu intervened.

A representative of Israel’s National Security Council confirmed on Tuesday that Netanyahu “authorized the Cabinet secretary to examine the matter and submit the findings to him.”

A representative of Israel’s Foreign Ministry who attended the Knesset Education Committee on Tuesday also confirmed this, telling members that “the prime minister authorized the Cabinet secretary, and alternative options to the law are currently being examined.”

Asked about the Foreign Ministry’s position, he said: “It is too early to express a position.”

Netanyahu’s stance confused the proposal’s supporters and those who had pushed for it.

Education Committee Chairman Zvi Sukkot said that the law was getting promoted in the committee.

‘A violation of law’

Tami Sela, the legal adviser to the Knesset Education Committee, submitted a legal opinion stating that the bill violates international law, raises legal difficulties, and could be interpreted as creeping annexation.

“This is an unusual proposal and an unprecedented one, as an Israeli civil authority that is not part of the Israeli military would be granted powers in Palestinian territories and over their residents,” she said.

“In addition, the proposed law contradicts the Oslo Accords and constitutes a violation of the rules of international law.”

Sela noted that military authority in the West Bank is considered temporary, and that “passing this law could strengthen claims of a gradual annexation process.”

In addition to Sela, security officials opposed the law. The Israeli army said it “would harm the standing of military and security officials, and would be viewed internationally as a step involving de facto annexation.”

The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities also appealed to Netanyahu to prevent the law from passing.

According to the Academy, the passage of the law will be viewed in political and academic circles as the annexation of Judea and Samaria.

This will undoubtedly lead to an immediate deterioration in Israel’s international relations in the field of archaeology and will also affect other areas of science and research.

The council of the Israel Antiquities Authority submitted a similar position paper, warning that “the bill could cause significant damage to academic relations with international bodies.”

It said the legislation “will be interpreted as a violation of international law, and will severely harm Israeli archaeologists’ membership in international organizations and research cooperation, including important excavation projects in the country.”

Israeli media outlets, including The Times of Israel, said the antiquities bill will most likely not be brought to a final vote in the plenum before the Knesset is dissolved.

The Times of Israel said the Knesset plenum convened on Tuesday with no bills on its agenda.

The coalition currently cannot rely on the support of the ultra-Orthodox parties in the Knesset, which led the campaign to dissolve the Knesset, to back its legislation.

This is the first time the Knesset has attempted to give a civil authority powers over Palestinian Authority territory and its residents.

It comes as the Israeli government has pushed a series of laws that would weaken and dismantle the Palestinian Authority and expand Israeli powers in the West Bank.

Smotrich enters Solomon’s Pools

Ignoring Netanyahu and the criticism, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich entered the archaeological area of Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem on Monday and vowed to take control of it.

Speaking from the site, Smotrich said: “Transferring these pools and this heritage achievement to the terrorist Palestinians was a mistake. It should not have been transferred to Area A for them to desecrate. We will restore the area. I have taken it upon myself to rebuild these pools and open them to visitors. This is a historic matter and a matter of Zionist heritage. We will succeed, God willing, and we will achieve this important goal.”

Solomon’s Pools are among the most important historical, archaeological, and water landmarks in Palestine. They are located southwest of Bethlehem and consist of three very large heritage pools.

The Palestinian Ministry of Awqaf and Religious Affairs condemned Smotrich’s move, stressing that the area is “purely Islamic endowment property.”

“This incursion represents a blatant attack on endowment properties, and a desperate attempt to impose a new colonial reality and falsify the historical and Islamic identity of the area,” it said.

The ministry called on the international community, rights institutions, and UNESCO to intervene immediately to stop what it called this arrogance.