Kadhimi: We Refuse for Iraq to Be Used as Platform to Threaten Any Side

Dignitaries at the Baghdad summit on Saturday. (AFP)
Dignitaries at the Baghdad summit on Saturday. (AFP)
TT

Kadhimi: We Refuse for Iraq to Be Used as Platform to Threaten Any Side

Dignitaries at the Baghdad summit on Saturday. (AFP)
Dignitaries at the Baghdad summit on Saturday. (AFP)

Less than a week after celebrating its centenary, Iraq succeeded on Saturday in hosting the first major regional conference of its kind on its territories.

The Baghdad Cooperation and Partnership conference witnessed the participation of nine countries, including five neighbors – Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Kuwait, Iran and Turkey. Syria was notably not invited. Three regional countries – Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar – were represented, as was France.

Saturday’s event was a significant achievement for Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi, who managed to organize it in his capacity as head of a transitional government and 45 days before its term is set to end. Iraq is scheduled to hold general elections in October.

Observers were surprised by the attendance of top heads of states to the conference, which they interpreted as a sign that Iraq was consolidating its regional position.

Leaders at the summit underscored the importance of a stable Iraq and the need to support its stability, describing the country as a “guarantee” for regional stability.

During his opening address Kadhimi stressed that his country has confronted major challenges. The hosting of the conference in Baghdad “embodies Iraq’s vision for the need to establish the best relations with the world.”

“We have vowed before our people to restore Iraq’s pioneering role. We have sensed serious international will to support investment in Iraq,” he added.

Moreover, the PM refused for Iraq to be used as an arena for regional and international conflicts or for it to be used as a platform to threaten any side.

Kadhimi stated that the Iraqi people, through international support, defeated the ISIS extremist group and now was the time to breathe new life throughout Iraq.

On the upcoming elections, he said his government had urged the international community to support the polls.

The conference was not without criticism, with Kadhimi’s rivals denouncing the failure to invite Syria even though it neighbors Iraq, while France, a distant European country, was invited instead.

Despite the criticism, several Iraqi leaders, including head of the Hikma movement Ammar al-Hakim, and Sunni and Kurdish officials, underscored the importance of holding the summit at this time.

Independent MP Hussein Arab told Asharq Al-Awsat that the summit “delivers an important message that Iraq has started to play a major role in putting in order its internal issues.” He also highlighted the impact of Iraq’s stability on the region.

“Under this government, Iraq started to play the role of positive mediator in regional disputes,” he went on to say.

This mediator has solutions and managed to bring together rivals at the same table, he added.

“Iraq has become a major player in the region,” he stated.

The Baghdad conference conveyed a message that “we can all sit at the same table for the sake of achieving economic and security goals… Effectively, the conference embodies the principle of partnership and this will positively impact all sides,” he continued.

Media professor at the University of Kufa, Dr. Ghaleb al-Daami told Asharq Al-Awsat: “One major point in Iraq’s favor is that it is practically the only country at the conference that enjoys good ties with all participants.”

“If Iraq succeeded in convincing the participants that it is indeed an independent nation and is seeking partnership with them, then they will all not hesitate in supporting it.”



Israel’s Retaliatory Responses to Houthis Must Begin by Drawing Intelligence Plan

A person inspects damage at the site where a projectile fired from Yemen landed in Tel Aviv on December 21, 2024 (EPA)
A person inspects damage at the site where a projectile fired from Yemen landed in Tel Aviv on December 21, 2024 (EPA)
TT

Israel’s Retaliatory Responses to Houthis Must Begin by Drawing Intelligence Plan

A person inspects damage at the site where a projectile fired from Yemen landed in Tel Aviv on December 21, 2024 (EPA)
A person inspects damage at the site where a projectile fired from Yemen landed in Tel Aviv on December 21, 2024 (EPA)

Israel is considering options to respond to repeated attacks fired from Yemen in the past few days, the latest of which was a Houthi missile strike that injured more than a dozen people in Tel Aviv.
But military experts say Israel should first consider an intelligence plan for confronting the new front after it faced significant difficulties in both defending against and responding to the Houthi attacks.
On Saturday morning, Houthis launched a missile that triggered sirens throughout central Israel at 3:44 am. It was the second attack since Thursday.
Israel's military said the projectile landed in Tel Aviv's southern Jaffa area, adding that attempts to intercept a missile from Yemen failed.
“The incident is still being thoroughly investigated,” the army said, adding that following initial investigations by the Israeli Air Force and Home Front Command, “some of the conclusions have already been implemented, both regarding interception and early warning.”
Israeli military experts say the recent Houthi attacks have revealed serious security gaps in Israel's air defense systems.
“The pressing question now is why none of the other of Israel’s air defense layers managed to intercept the warhead,” wrote Yedioth Ahronoth's Ron Ben-Yishai. “The likely explanation is the late detection and the flat trajectory, which prevented the operation of all available defense apparatus.”
He said these incidents might expose a critical vulnerability in the army’s air defense system protecting Israel’s civilian and military home front.
According to Ben-Yishai, two main reasons might explain Saturday’s interception failure.
The first is that the missile was launched in a “flattened” ballistic trajectory, possibly from an unexpected direction.
As a result, Israeli defenses may not have identified it in time, leading to its late discovery and insufficient time for interceptors to operate.
He said the second, and more likely scenario is that Iran has developed a maneuverable warhead.
Such a warhead separates from the missile during the final third of its trajectory and maneuvers mid-flight—executing pre-programmed course changes—to hit its designated target, he wrote.
And while Israel has launched initial investigations into the failure of Israeli defense systems to intercept the missiles, it is now examining the nature, date and location of its response.
When Houthis launched their first missile attack on Israel last Thursday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned them, saying, “The Houthis will learn the hard way.”
But Israeli political analyst Avi Ashkenazi wrote in the Maariv newspaper that Israel should look at reality with open eyes and say out loud that it cannot deal with the Houthi threat from Yemen, and has failed to face them.
Last Thursday, 14 Israeli Air Force fighter jets, alongside refuelers and spy planes, flew some 2,000 kilometers and dropped over 60 munitions on Houthi “military targets” along Yemen’s western coast and near the capital Sanaa.
The targets included fuel and oil depots, two power stations, and eight tugboats used at the Houthi-controlled ports.
But the Maariv newspaper warned about the increasing involvement of Iran in supporting the Houthi forces.
“Iran has invested more in the Houthis in recent weeks following the collapse of the Shiite axis, making the Houthi movement a leader of this axis,” the newspaper noted.
Underscoring the failures of Israel’s air defense systems, Maariv said the “Arrow” missile defense system, Israel's main line of defense against ballistic missiles, had failed four times in a row to intercept missiles, including three launched from Yemen and one from Lebanon.
Yedioth Ahronoth's Ben-Yishai also warned that the threat posed by maneuvering warheads on Iran's heavy, long-range missiles would become existential for Israel should Iran succeed in developing nuclear warheads for these missiles.
Meanwhile, Israel’s Channel 12 said that in recent months, the Middle East has changed beyond recognition.
The channel said that for the first time in more than half a century, a direct and threat-free air corridor has been opened to Iran through the Middle East. Israel will benefit from this corridor to launch almost daily attacks on the border crossings between Syria and Lebanon, it said.
Channel 12 also reported that according to the Israeli military, the new threat-free corridor will help Israel launch a future attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
“From Israel's perspective, the fall of the Assad regime and the collapse of the Iranian ring of fire are changing the balance of power in the Middle East,” the report added.